Is jihad the ‘struggle for the soul of Islam’ or mass-murder for the sake of allah?

The useful idiots are out in force; the real enemy is Pamela Geller for her anti-jihad ads:

DC is up!

NPR is hard at work using our taxpayer dollars to advance the propaganda of jihadists. The Goebbels-style ad campaign of Hamas-CAIR is getting enormous support from an outrageously compromised NPR. You can put a happy child’s face on mass murder, but it’s still mass murder.

Our campaign makes the point that minimizing jihad is minimizing mass murder and cultural annihilation.  NPR’s Jihad @MoniqueFParsons #usefulidiot

The cognitive dissonance and the rejection of reality is bizarre:

“Jihad is a duty”: Bin Laden’s son-in-law pleads not guilty in NY

The AP (associated with terrorists press) calls this jihadist murderer “charismatic.” Really? What’s their idea of a sex symbol? Abu Hamza?

 “The Americans must know that the storm of airplanes will not stop, God willing, and there are thousands of young people who are as keen about death as Americans are about life,”– Abu Ghaith

“Bin Laden’s Son-in-Law: Pleads Not Guilty in NY,” by Lara Jakes and Tom Hays for the Associated Press, March 8 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, the charismatic al-Qaida spokesman, fundraiser and son-in-law to Osama bin Laden, is likely to have a vast trove of knowledge about the terror network’s central command but not much useful information about current threats or plots, intelligence officials and other experts say.

Why is he being tried in New York? This just gives him a platform. But while he is in the U.S., maybe he will see Hamas-linked CAIR’s jihad-is-romping-through-the-daisies ads, and realize the error of his ways.–“Jihad is a duty”: read it all!

2 thoughts on “Is jihad the ‘struggle for the soul of Islam’ or mass-murder for the sake of allah?”

  1. The meaning of jihad isn’t “controversial” nor a “position” (opinion) nor “up for debate;” it’s been clearly defined in the Qur’an for the last 1,400 years.

    Even sharia crime (“law”) defines it as perpetual physical war against the infidiels for their crime of being non-moslems. Their (our) lives are only “dead matter” and it is a moslems’ duty to kill them (us) all for allah. Exemptions are given to the old and sick – if jihad was really only some sort of “peaceful inner struggle,” then these exemptions not only wouldn’t be needed, they couldn’t even remotely be construed to apply to the concept. Simple.

  2. of course the son in law pleads not guilty – he knows that the useful idiots there will have a long drawn out, on tax payer money, trial now and he will gain the headlines every so often pulling his moocrap.

    But as for the title of this article I would like to say that it jihad is for themselves – the individual moslem, and people like their mothers raise them to be violent jihadists so they can also be named as one of the 70 who are saved because they know, deep down, their allah thing won’t pull them out of heaven!

    moe moe the pedo said that most moslem women are in hell… sort of ironic that some haven’t considered that in allah’s orgy there is a 70-1 ratio of women to men which sounds like the ratio of allah’s hell. … just saying.

Comments are closed.