Converted at gunpoint:
Vienna: An Austrian man held hostage for five months in Yemen said he was kept in permanent darkness in a room too small to stand up in and was forced to convert to Islam at gunpoint.
Kidnapping and hostage taking is un-Islamic, (so they tell us)
Gunmen beat two Yemenis accompanying him when they attempted to stop the kidnapping
Just like in the ‘Golden Age’ in ‘al Andalus’
Interfaith activity in Banglatrash:
Filthy infidel whore tried to shake hands with Muslim:
Dhimmi response on French priest attack: Â Â “Can happen to anybody”
80% of Â Pakistan’s population lives in poverty
FARZANA HASSAN , who writes for the TORONTO SUN believes we need to pay more jiziya.
Given Islam’s violent history and the unfavorable contrast of its oppressive practices against 21st century values, Muslims are hard-pressed to repackage their faith in the modern age.Â SomeÂ of its leading apologists have come to rely on tricks involving semantics and half-truths that are, in turn, repeated by novices and even those outside the faith.
This is a document (which we hope to improve on and expand over time) that exposes some of these games and helps truth-seekers find their way through the maze of disingenuous (often blatantly false) claims about Islam and its history.Â
“IfÂ Islam were a violent religion, then all Muslims would be violent.”
The Muslim Game:
Most Muslims live peacefully, without harming others, so how can Islam be a violent religion?Â If Islam were the religion of terrorists, then why aren’t most Muslims terrorists?
The same question can easily be turned around.Â If Islam is a religion of peace, then why is it the only one that consistently produces religiously-motivated terrorist attacks each and every day of the year?Â Why are thousands of people willing and able to cut off an innocent person’s head or fly a plane full of passengers into an office building while screaming praises to Allah?Â Where’s the outrage among other Muslims when this happens… and why do they get more worked up over cartoons and hijabs?
Rather than trying to answer a question with a question, however, let’s just say that the reason why most Muslims don’t killÂ is that regardless of what Islam may or may not teachÂ it’s wrong to kill over religious beliefs.
Consider that many Muslims would not even think of amputating a thief’s hand.Â Does this mean that it is against Islam to do so?Â Of course not!Â In fact, it is clearly mandated in both the Qur’an (5:38) and the example set by Muhammad according to the Hadith (Bukhari 81:792).Â As individuals, Muslims make their own choices about which parts of their religion they practice.
However, even though believers may think whatever they want about what Islam says or doesn’t say, it doesn’t change what Islam says about itself.Â As a documented ideology, Islam exists independently of anyone’s opinion.Â Â As such, it may be studied objectively and apart from how anyone else practices or chooses to interprets it.
The Qur’an plainly teaches that it is not only proper to kill in the name of Allah in certain circumstances, but that it is actually aÂ requirement.Â Â Muslims who don’t believe in killing over religion may be that way out of ignorance or because they are more loyal to the moral law written in their hearts than they are to the details of Muhammad’s religion.Â Those who put Islam first or know Islam best know otherwise.
In fact, few Muslims have ever read the Qur’anÂ to any extent, much less pursued an honest investigation of the actual words and deeds of Muhammad, which were more in line withhedonism, deception, power and violenceÂ than with moral restraint.Â The harsh rules that Muslim countries impose on free speech to protect Islam from critique also prevent it from being fully understood.Â In the West, many Muslims, devout or otherwise, simply prefer to believe that Islam is aligned with the Judeo-Christian principles of peace and tolerance, even if it means filtering evidence to the contrary.
It is no coincidence, however, that the purists who take Islam too heart are far more likely to become terrorists than humanitarians.Â Those most prone to abandoning themselves to Muhammad’s message without moral preconception are always the more dangerous and supremacist-minded.Â They may be called ‘extremists’ or ‘fundamentalists,’ but, at the end of the day, they are also dedicated to the Qur’an and following the path of Jihad asÂ mandatedÂ by Muhammad.
“OtherÂ religions kill, too.”
The Muslim Game:
Bringing other religions down to the level of Islam is one of the most popular strategies of Muslim apologists when confronted with the spectacle of Islamic violence.Â Remember Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber?Â How about Anders Breivik, the Norwegian killer?Â Why pick on Islam if other religions have the same problems?Â
Because they don’t.Â
Regardless of what his birth certificate may or may not have said, Timothy McVeigh was not a religious man (in fact, he stated explicitly that he wasÂ agnosticÂ and that “science” was his religion).Â At no time did he credit his deeds to religion, quote Bible verses, or claim that he killed for Jesus.Â His motives are very wellÂ documentedÂ through interviews and research.Â God is never mentioned.
The so-called “members of other faiths” alluded to by Muslims are nearly always just nominal members who have no active involvement.Â They are neither inspired by, nor do they credit religion as Muslim terrorists do – and this is what makes it a very different matter.Â
Islam is associated with Islamic terrorism because that is the association that the terrorists themselves choose to make.
Muslims who compare crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed explicitly in the name of Islam are comparing apples to oranges.Â
Yes, some of the abortion clinic bombers were religious (as Muslims enjoy pointing out), but consider the scope of the problem.Â There have been six deadly attacks over aÂ 36 yearÂ period in the U.S.Â Eight people died.Â This is an average of one death every 4.5 years.
By contrast, Islamic terrorists staged nearlyÂ ten thousandÂ deadly attacks in just the six years following September 11th, 2001.Â If one goes back to 1971, when Muslim armies in Bangladesh began the mass slaughter of Hindus, through the years of Jihad in the Sudan, Kashmir and Algeria, and the present-day Sunni-Shia violence in Iraq, the number of innocents killed in the name of Islam probablyÂ exceedsÂ five millionÂ over this same period.
Anders Breivik, who murdered 77 innocents in a lone rampage on July 22nd, 2011, was originally misidentified as a “Christian fundamentalist” by the police.Â In fact, the killings were later determined to be politically motivated.Â He also left behind a detailed 1500 page manifesto in which he stated that he is not religious, does not know if God exists, and prefers a secular state to a theocracy.Â Needless to say, he does not quote any Bible verses in support of his killing spree, nor did he shout “praise the Lord” as he picked people off.Â
In the last ten years, there have been perhaps a dozen or so religiously-inspired killings by people of all other faiths combined.Â No other religionÂ produces the killing sprees that Islam does nearly every day of the year.Â Neither do they haveÂ versesÂ in their holy texts that arguably support it.Â Nor do they have large groups across the globeÂ dedicatedÂ to the mass murder of people who worship a different god, as the broader community of believers struggles with ambivalence and tolerance for a radical clergy that supports the terror.
Muslims may like to pretend that other religions are just as subject to “misinterpretation” as is their “perfect” one, but the reality speaks of something far worse.
MuhammadÂ preached “No compulsion in religion.”
(Qur’an, Verse 2:256)
Â The Muslim Game:
Muslims quote verse 2:256 from the Qur’an to prove what a tolerant religion Islam is.Â The verse reads in part,Â “Let there be no compulsion in religion; truth stands out clearly from error…”
The Muslim who offers this verse may or may not understand that it is from one of the earliest Suras (or chapters) from the Medinan period.Â It was “revealed” at a time when the Muslims had just arrived in Medina after being chased out of Mecca.Â They needed to stay in the good graces of the stronger tribes around them, many of which were Jewish.Â It was around this time, for example, that Muhammad decided to have his followers change the direction of their prayer from Mecca to Jerusalem.
But Muslims today pray toward Mecca.Â The reason for this is that Muhammad issued a later command that abrogated (or nullified) the first.Â In fact, abrogation is a very important principle to keep in mind when interpreting the Qur’an – and verse 2:256 in particular – because later verses (in chronological terms) are said to abrogate any earlier ones that may be in contradiction (Qur’an 2:106, 16:101).
Muhammad’s message was far closer to peace and tolerance during his early years at Mecca, when he didn’t have an army and was trying to pattern his new religion after Christianity.Â This changed dramaticallyÂ after he attained the power to conquer, which he eventually used with impunity to bring other tribes into the Muslim fold.Â Contrast verse 2:256 with Suras 9 and 5, which were the last “revealed,” and it is easy to see why Islam has been anything but a religion of peace from the time of Muhammad to the present day.
There is some evidence that verse 2:256 may not have been intended for Muslims at all, but is instead meant to be a warning to other religions concerning their treatment of Muslims.Â Verse 193 of the same Sura instructs Muslims to “fightÂ withÂ themÂ (non-Muslims)Â until there is no more persecution andÂ religion is only for Allah.“Â This reinforces the narcissistic nature of Islam, which places Muslims above non-Muslims, and applies a very different value and standard of treatment to both groups.
Though most Muslims today reject the practice of outright forcing others into changing their religion,forced conversionÂ has been a part of Islamic history since Muhammad first picked up a sword.Â As he is recorded in many places as saying,Â “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah…”Â Â (SeeÂ Bukhari 2:24)
Muhammad put his words into practice.Â When he marched into Mecca with an army, one of his very first tasks was to destroy idols at the Kaaba, which had been devoutly worshipped by the Arabs for centuries.Â By eliminating these objects of worship, he destroyed the religion of the people and supplanted it with his own.Â Later, he ordered that Jews and Christians who would not convert to Islam beÂ expelledÂ from Arabia.Â Does forcing others to choose between their homes or their faith sound like “no compulsion in religion?”
According to Muslim historians, Muhammad eventually ordered people to attend prayers at the mosque to the point ofÂ burning aliveÂ those who didn’t comply.Â He also ordered that children who reached a certain age beÂ beatenÂ if they refused to pray.
Interestingly, even the same contemporary MuslimsÂ who quote 2:256 usually believe in Islamic teachings that soundÂ very much like religious compulsion.Â These would be the laws punishing apostasy by death (orÂ imprisonment, for females), and the institutionalized discrimination against religious minorities under Islamic rule that is sometimes referred to as “dhimmiitude.”
Islamic lawÂ explicitly prohibits non-Muslims from sharing their faith and even includes the extortion of money from them in the form of a tax called theÂ jizya.Â Those who refuse to pay this arbitrary amount are put to death.Â If this isn’t compulsion, then what is?