“Backlash”, people! Everywhere you look: “backlash”

UK Press Coverage of Zanzibar Acid Attack Risks Inflaming Religious Tensions

… Currently, there are simmering political and religious tensions in Zanzibar. Early this year, a Catholic priest was shot dead and a church set on fire during the Sounds of Wisdom festival, which promotes religious tolerance. …

Press coverage  inflames religious tensions, not actions of acid throwers? More acid-throwing, shooting and burning at Global Voices/ thanks to Mullah


Law requiring Muslim women to remove burqa to prove their identity to police introduced to WA Parliament

liberating freedom sack

A NEW law that would require Muslim women to remove a burqa or niqab to prove their identity to West Australian police has been introduced to the state’s parliament.


Muslim Brotherhood supporters torch three churches

AFP calls these “reprisal attacks,” but they are reprisals for nothing. The Morsi supporters are scapegoating the Copts for their hero’s failure and removal from office. “Morsi supporters ‘torch three churches’ in Egypt,” from AFP, August 14:

Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood supporters attack Christians, torch Coptic school


In addition to burning churches. Muslim Brotherhood supporters are scapegoating the Christians for the failure of Morsi; violence against the Christians is escalating all across the country. But the world is too busy worrying about “Islamophobia” to take much notice. (JW) Photo thanks to Mostafa Ragab.


Muslims attack monastery, police confront Christians with pepper spray but leave attackers untouched

Again and again we see Muslims attack Christians in Muslim lands, and police stand by and do nothing, or arrive late, or fail to pursue any investigation of the attackers. This is because they share the Islamic supremacist beliefs of the attackers. “Assyrian Monastery Attacked in Turkey,” from AINA, August 12: JW

From the Elder of Ziyon

U.S. pressures Israel to restart “peace” talks by freeing 26 “Palestinians” who were all involved in killing Israelis

What do the “Palestinians” have to do to show their good faith? Why, nothing. Nothing at all. No tempering of their genocidal hate rhetoric, no declaration of recognition of Israel or of Israel’s right to exist. Nothing. Meanwhile, how many of these 26 will return to the jihad against Israel, and kill more Israelis?

“All 26 Palestinians freed were involved in killing Israelis,” from the Times of Israel, August 14:

Overnight Tuesday, Israel released 26 high-profile Palestinian prisoners, all of whom were convicted of direct or indirect involvement in the killings of Israelis, the Israeli government said. The releases — the first in four phases in which a total of 104 long-term Palestinian convicts will go free — were agreed as part of a deal for the resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians.

Sickening photos of Abbas celebrating with murderers

Every single person released from prison by Israel on Tuesday was involved in murder.
abbas pris1Some went out to kill any Jew that would pass by; others targeted specific civilians. One killed a Holocaust survivor. Another killed an 84 year old man with an axe. Yet another targeted a 51 year old woman in the car where she would give rides to Arab workers.These people are beneath contempt.

To Israel’s “peace partner” Mahmoud Abbas, and to his people, they are heroes.

Only one reason is given for the rally.Hassan Ghandour, spokesman on behalf of the “Sons of Mubarak,” explained that all Egyptians are indebted to Mubarak because “he is the last remaining Muslim leader who had humiliated the Jews.”

Those Israeli settlements have been getting Arabs upset for such a long time!

Jailed Muslim Brotherhood Leader Al-Shater Has Information That Will Land Barack Obama in Jail

Posted by Jim Hoft of GWP

Obama’s Deputy Secretary of State William Burns and European Union envoy Bernardino Leon were scheduled to meet with the Muslim Brotherhood’s second in command Khairat el-Shatar on August 5, 2013. The Obama administration was set to offer the Muslim Brotherhood three positions in the Egyptian cabinet.

Press TV reported:
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

Now this…
Saed al-Shater, the son of Khairat el-Shatar, told the Anatolia News Agency in Turkey that his father has evidence that will land Barack Obama in prison.World Net Daily reported…..


3 thoughts on ““Backlash”, people! Everywhere you look: “backlash””

  1. Tokyobk said:I will add this, though. I do believe in rule of law.The rule of law’ implies that the law is always just. There are plenty of unjust laws in the countries you mentioned (historically and in the present).So saying you believe in the rule of law’ is meaningless.Saying you believe murderers should stay in jail if they are proven to be murderers, is much better.And I agree with you on that.What I would like to know is, how many of the Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails are civilian-killers/terrorists?How many are agent provocateurs’ politically-speaking? I could care less about the latter. There is no parity in this conflict. Israeli soldiers and settlers abuse and kill Palestinian civilians with virtual immunity/relative immunity.So within THIS conflict and avoiding resorting to the hasbara tactic of changing the subject to Darfur/Sudan/Libya/Syria/China/etc. as a way of whitewashing or downplaying Israeli crimes I believe comparing ISRAEL to PALESTINE’ is fair.These are the two parties of the conflict. The relationship’s relevance is self-evident.SO, within THAT context as I implied above it really makes me wonder why you pour over these issues and these comments rather than on the casual and daily abuses by Israel. Accompanied by the casual and daily approval by Zionists as evidence on MW by the people like the person you supposedly chastised above.The moral way to condemn Israel and Zionism is not within the Law’ because there is no Law with a capital L. Especially when it comes to Israel, there is no Law. There is facts on the ground’. There is the Holocaust Industry. The Israel Lobby. The MiC. Who cares if the Palestinians are happy with the prisoner release? Do you think that’s what they preferred?Israel has thousands of Palestinian prisoners. That’s why those Palestinians get released. They are considered worthless bargaining chips.Scratch that, releasing any Palestinian prisoner will create this image of Israel as a benevolent occupier making a tough decision for peace (in spite of settlement expansion) AND provide fodder for the settler-type Zionists as well as even J-Street.Both of the latter groups lambasted the release.How many of our resident settler-Zionists on MW used the same skepticism when that has-been singer, Something Burdon, was sent threatening emails’?ALL of the Zios on MW immediately claimed it was BDS, citing an earlier FRAUD that Paul McCartney was also threatened by BDS.Apply your rubric to both the Israelis and the Palestinians. To both anti-Zionists like me and the settler/racist/Jewish-supremacists like hophmi, gilad-g, yrn, Oleg-R, fnsomethingnewtroll.Otherwise you’re just like them anyway (which I suspect you are so whatever, not that any of this matters!).Take heart tokyobk, your side has won.There’s not much we can do when people hate Arabs and Muslims in general and aren’t even interested in Israel/Palestine.

    1. ALL muslims are criminals, so they should be hated until they repent of their crimes. “Hate” is only perpetual anger against ongoing crimes (like islam) without such anger, no one would ever even bother to contest these holy mobster criminals’ assertions of their “allah-given rights” to commit their crimes, and thereby to eventually end them. Only immoral relativists pretend to want to criminalize mere symptoms, such as “hate.” When people try to make “hate” into a crime, they only make it “illegal” to hate crimes! And to pretend that “attacking” is always bad – that Jews living in their own lands and defending them selves with counter-attacks, are ‘just as bad’ as those criminal muslim “paelstinians” who attack them in the first place, is completely immoral. There never were, still aren’t and never will be any “palestinian people;” even the philistines lived hundreds of miles to the North, near Antioch. Those today who pretend to be such are really only some displaced Egyptians in Gaza, and some exiled Syrian Arabs from Jordan, stranded on the West bank of the Jordan river – in JUDEA.

      And, YES, there is a capital-L “LAW:” It’s also known as the Golden Rule of Law, and it most simply defines all situational morality as:
      “Do Not Attack First.”

      We only have one right & responsibility to each other, which is defined by The Golden Rule of Law: to not attack first.

      Our only responsibility is to not attack first, and our only right is to not be attacked first.

      The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

      Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws.

      Bad laws are crimes because they attack first. At “best” they are only ‘ethical’ lists of rules and excuses amerliorating bad, attack-first criminal premises.

      A “Judge’s” only job is to determine rational cause-and-effect (who started it) and all irrational criminal excuses or alibis are based on the opposite, victim-blaming slanderous pretense.

      It should therefore be easy for any judge to see if a law is bad (an attempt to deprive citizens of due process, by disregarding any need for evidence by slanderously insisting on asserting that they are Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent, and so must impossibly prove a negative in order to defend them selves).

      In general, no force or police are necessary among free citizens who can govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police are enough for a people who CANNOT govern themselves.

      All crimes are forms of theft: offensive attacks that deny the attacker’s victim something they, not the attacker, are entitled to; basic robbery is theft of one’s stuff (and so is arson); kidnapping, assault, and rape are all thefts of one’s bodily autonomy, murder is theft of one’s life, and lying (fraud) is only the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth. (And lying includes presenting one’s merely subjective, unresearched, fact-free opinion as if it were objective fact; i.e: pre-judicial slander)!

      And even all threats are psychological attacks (aka: coercion, duress, extortion, “terrorism”) which are thefts of one’s peace of mind and security, and all non-defensive attacks are already classified as crimes.

      After all, when you attack the Others first, then, by definition, you are the predatory criminal aggressor, and they are your innocent victims – there’s no two ways about it!

      (Attacking second, in defense of one’s self and/or of innocent others, is always OK, and is in fact a mandatory requirement for having any sort of deterring justice in the world at all, ever! Without counter-attacks criminals have no reason to be deterred into ceasing theirs)!

      Thus, we have developed a natural law, which rationally depends on these cause-and-effect facts, known as The Golden Rule of Law, which, by defining situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!” enables trust, progress, and Civilization. It is often abstracted as “THOU SHALT NOT KILL!”

      It’s opposite might be called ‘the brazen rule of chaos,’ which defines immorality as “only we have the holy right to always attack all ‘The Others’ first, so there, nyah!” and so inflicts distrust, stagnation, and Barbarism. It has been abstracted as “THOU SHALT KILL!” (and is known today as “islam”)!

      Even the ‘Ten’ Commandments are really only a bunch of listed symptoms, illustrating this simple binary; the first five are all cautions to “Fear and Obey!” while the second five are all admonishments not to steal! Thus, they, too, can be summed up as “Greed NOT; Be Fearful!” (or: don’t attack first)! – while islam embodies the exact opposite (“Fear NOT; Be Greedy”) – or: “Always attack first!”

      And of course the victim-blaming rationale for evil is always that one was somehow only “defending” one’s self, by pre-emptively attacking the others first, by adding insult to injury with the slanderous implication that “well, they were going to attack me, anyway” and “so it’s for their own good for them to Submit to me attacking them, first”)!

      Even small children instinctively know the Golden Rule of Law as the:

      “But, Mom! THEY STARTED IT!” Rule.

      Interestingly, our despised (by moslems) “Western” system of morality, is in fact entirely “Eastern” (Chinese) in origin!

      It was first coined by Cong Fuzi (“Confucius”) in the negative (as “Do NOT Do Unto Others…!”) and then allegedly by Jesus in the (false, nannnysate advice) positive, and since then it’s been used in the UN’s founding Charter (where it describes the #1 War-Crime as “to be the aggressor in war”). It’s the physician’s Hippocratic Oath (“First, Do No Harm!”) and is even used by social engineers as the “Precautionary Principle.”

      It’s opposite creed, which I’ve termed the ‘Brazen Rule of Chaos’ has been attributed by John Milton in Paradise Lost, to Satan, as: “Who Dares, Wins!”

      Backwards criminals always conflate their own “might-makes-right” jungle-law creed with the Old Testament’s “An Eye for An Eye” doctrine of proportional deterrence and justice, when in fact they are exact opposites! They also pretend the (after-the-fact) “ends justify the means!” when, in fact, the means only ever really define the end results:

      After all, when you decide to lie, kill, and otherwise steal to get ahead, in the end, you’re not really a “great success,” you’re still really only a lying, murdering thief!

      Many liberals pretend, like evil nannystate kindergarten teachers, that “attacking” (even in self defense) is always bad.

      They only ever really encourage the bullies and blame their victims, by irrrationally asserting that cause-and-effect don’t matter; that: “*I* don’t care who started it, *I* only want it all to STOP!”

      This is victim-blaming, evil subjectivism, conflating effect with cause.

      What’s necessary is for at least one “side” to stop comparing apples and rocks, and to admit: “Yes, this is bad in itself; bad is bad.” Otherwise, it just perpetuates the childish cycle that two wrongs somehow makes one of them into a right.

      “Attacking” isn’t what’s bad; that’s only a symptom; what’s bad is only attacking FIRST.

Comments are closed.