Obama Inc, Which is Arming Syrian Rebels Fighting to Overthrow Assad, Claims It Isn’t Seeking Regime Change
Of course it’s not regime change. Libya wasn’t about regime change either. What possible reasonÂ could we have to doubt Jay Carney’s claimÂ aside from the fact that Obama is arming and training Syrian rebels who want to oust Assad.
Idiotic. “Â if you don’t know what to do, don’t do anything…” Miles Davis
By now it should be obvious that whenever the U.S. interferes in another nation’s politics in the name of “human rights,” that that is only a pretext.
Unreal. The swine!
The MuBro’s determine the narrative. Will they determine the outcome too?
Never thought I would agree with Kucinich on anything….
BBC News uses ‘Iraq photo to illustrate Syrian massacre’
Photographer Marco di Lauro said he nearly “fell off his chair” when he saw the image being used, and said he was “astonished” at the failure of the corporation to check their sources.
American military intervention in Syria is likely to begin this week, and one thing we know amid the general confusion is that the objective is not to oust Bashar Assad: White House spokesman Jay CarneyÂ said Tuesday: “I want to make clear that the options that we are considering are not about regime change. They are about responding to a clear violation of international standard that prohibits the use of chemical weapons.” How the Obama Administration plans to deal with Assad’s alleged use of chemical weapons without challenging his grip on power is unclear, but then again, so is everything else about this misadventure.