Abolishing Europe because it feels nice

Britain’s stated aim of getting Turkey to join the EU is mad

– Atlas Shrugs

Britain admits jihadists like Mohammed al-Arefe and the UK Muslims returning from Syria, but bars counter-jihadists like Robert Spencer and me. And Britain is intent on getting Turkey into the European Union, which would mean a new flood of devout Muslim jihadis from Iraq and Syria passing easily in…

Turkey Revealed Israeli Spy Ring To Iran Last Year

Beats me why Israel would divulge anything about their spies to Turkey.

(Reuters) – Turkey deliberately blew the cover of an Israeli spy ring working inside Iran in early 2012 and dealt a significant blow to Israeli intelligence gathering, according to a report in the Washington Post on Thursday.–Read more….

Abolishing Europe because it feels nice

SafariScreenSnapz079

Twice this month, ships full of African migrants trying to reach Europe have sunk, and several hundred have died, near the Italian island of Lampedusa. According to the New York Times, that means Europe needs to let in more migrants, because somehow Europeans have a responsibility to deal with the reckless behavior of non-Europeans:

Every year, tens of thousands of migrants and asylum seekers pay thousands of dollars to smugglers to make the dangerous journey across the Mediterranean, despite treacherous conditions and an uncertain reception in Europe. Many analysts say Europe must do more to create legal channels to allow people from poorer countries to immigrate. Otherwise, they say, smugglers will continue to thrive by promising a better life.

….there are already people in Europe who have been there for thousands of years. By what ridiculous standard do they have to share their countries with people who are nothing like them? Does their prosperity somehow make them unworthy of having their own countries? Do Europeans have less of a right to live in Europe than non-Europeans? –

2 thoughts on “Abolishing Europe because it feels nice”

  1. “Many analysts say Europe must do more to create legal channels to allow people from poorer countries to immigrate. Otherwise, they say, smugglers will continue to thrive by by promising a better life.”

    All right,all right how many?

    Next question, what’s wrong with improving the the country they come from?What about removing a bit of corruption,asking for better governments. (by that I did not mean Islamic governments)

  2. “Many analysts say Europe must do more to create legal channels to allow people from poorer countries to immigrate. Otherwise, they say, smugglers will continue to thrive by by promising a better life.”

    Um, There ARE already “legal” channels for immigrants to go through in any country. These people have no desire to go through those legal channels, because legal immigrants in most countries enter into are prohibited from receiving social welfare in the new country they have elected to immigrate into. The ban in most countries is from anywhere between 5-10 years.

    If only they expended this much energy and moral outrage in their home countries they would be living a better life.

    How dare anyone come to another country and make demands that you would not make in your own country of origin. Cowards.

Comments are closed.