OUTLAW ISLAM? …we may have no choice

OUTLAW ISLAM? …we may have no choice

Pickering

Freedom of religion and separation of Church and State is a pillar of Western constitutions. Christianity has certainly treated that privilege with scant respect but Islam uses this Western privilege as a Trojan horse to infiltrate us, dominate us and destroy us.

Christian minorities in Islamic countries have their churches razed to the ground, families murdered and decapitated without penalty.

Yet Islamic minorities in Christian countries are free to go about their business of subjugating, then obliterating, their politically correct hosts. Something’s amiss.

France and the UK are now experiencing the horrific outcomes of multiculturalism and how it is debasing and destroying their own cultures.

Of course it is politically incorrect to suggest that Islam is at the root cause of this mayhem but it most certainly is.

Christianity promotes good principals and teachings. I disagree strongly with its inane doctrines and practices but not strongly enough to spray Christian schoolchildren with a hail of bullets.

Zealots of Islam target whatever gains them the most publicity; iconic buildings, subways, schools, funerals and now shopping malls, while we do nothing but sit and wait for the next atrocity.

Northern Europe has noticed the passive approach does not work. They are fighting back. France has banned the offensive burkha.

Japan has never allowed Islam a foothold and we too need to get serious before it’s too late.

The demonic Islamic cult knows no boundaries. It will resort to the most Barbaric of acts to further its cause. It rapes and genitally mutilates little girls (pictured). We know that, we see that, some of us experience that but our good nature tolerates it. So they continue.

If sensible measures aren’t taken soon, within a decade it will be necessary to ban the murderous cult entirely.

Mosques will be converted to council atriums and mullahs who promote violence will be deported. Islamic nationals will be told to either denounce Islam and adopt an acceptable religion or leave.

To put it bluntly Islam is opposed to all we hold dear. It determines that everyone is born Islam. Not just them, all of us! It is not a matter of mere victory over the infidel it is a matter of the complete annihilation of the disbeliever. This is their teaching, this is their belief.

There can never be treaties or pacts, rapprochement or détente with Islam.

If you do not convert and adhere to Islam and pray for forgiveness for straying, you must be beheaded in the name of Allah.
That is the teaching of the Koran.

There can be no compromise, ever! There can be no reconciliation. Either we rid ourselves of them or we will need to suffer their atrocities until we no longer exist. Only a fool believes otherwise.

Only now have we and they realised the West can be economically crippled with little effort. While Obama grovels to the Sheiks the lying Saudis plot our demise. It is they who are the adherents of the despicable Sharia law. It is they who finance Al Queda. It is they who bore and supported Bin Laden.

In a mere 20 years oil will not be used as an economic weapon against the West. It will not be used to finance terrorism. We will have nicer, cleaner alternatives to oil.

The undeserving Arabs will no longer have the finances for their excesses. They will return to their mouldy beginnings, insignificant shadows of former power bases that should never have been.

But the damage Islam wreaks on our culture will live on, if we let it.

Al Queda is driven only by a passionate hatred of the West and is financed by oil-drunk Saudis and cosseted by Pakistanis who have blackmailed the treacherous Pakistani “government” into allowing them autonomous Sharia States.

President Obama throws them an olive branch. So now they giggle in their beards at such a show of unrestrained weakness. Now they know we are rattled.

President Obama should peruse that old copy of the Koran in his schoolbag. It clearly says why appeasement is a waste of time.

Funny how a pregnant mother and eight of her children were not wearing life jackets on that weekend tragedy, only the father was.

To an Islamist male, women and children are expendable…. we don’t see things that way.

We are different and we don’t covet what they have but they believe we should and, until we do embrace their way of life, we remain apostates and their Koran instructs them that apostates must be beheaded and have their fingers amputated.

Sooner or later we will need to confront this base cult instead of giving it a platform from which to attack us.

The Oz Media’s Far Left Spin On Everything

I said it a hundred times and I’ll say it again:

The taxpayer funded ABC/SBS propaganda machine has to be dismantled. The leftist hacks have to be put out to pasture and several privatised networks have to be  established in its place. The Vitrioli brigades must have missed the memo that the horrid Labor regime has been voted out. Yet they cling to it like drunks hang on to a  toilet bowl to keep it from spinning….

Here’s the latest:

Abbott gets the cooperation from Indonesia his media critics dismissed

We were told – incorrectly – that Tony Abbott was too clumsy for diplomacy with Indonesia.

It shouldn’t be necessary to explain Abbott isn’t to blame for a sinking 50m from Indonesia’s shore

A socialist idiot suggests Tony Abbott may have let boat people drown, just as John Howard did (not). From Patrick O’Connor’s rant on the World Socialist Web Site on the sinking of a boat just 50m from the Indonesian shore.

The socialists who aid and abet the Mohammedan invasion of Australia are not only committing high treason, they are also voting for their own demise.

Can’t get over G-Lard:

From the way the ABC miscreants cling to “Australia’s First Female Prime Minister”  one could get the idea that we have another Evita in the making. I couldn’t watch it. G-Lard wasn’t up to it.  She should have never held the reigns of power. Her self-inflicted victimhood is pathetic. G-Lard was not only the worst PM that Oz has had, but the most classless too. A true nonentity.

374761-110903-leak1

Bolt:

 

The “Islamophobia” Meltdown

Torpedoing “Islamophobia”
.
Posted on  by 
.
Lets get right to the point:
.

For the International Civil Liberties Alliance, the theme for this week’s OSCE in Human Dimension Implementation Meeting in Warsaw was “Bad Definitions”. As readers have undoubtedly noticed, the most prominent bad definition is the word “Islamophobia”. There are plenty of other words than can be targeted as ill-defined, and those have been discussed here in earlier posts, and in the ICLA paper “The Problematic Definition of ‘Islamophobia’”. However, to make matters simpler, the ICLA team concentrated this week on “Islamophobia”.

On Tuesday night the ODIHR Tolerance and Non-Discrimination Department convened a side event, “Educational initiatives and approaches for addressing anti-Semitism and intolerance against Muslims”. This sounded like a worthwhile opportunity, and a large contingent of people from ICLA, Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa, the Center for Security Policy (CSP), the Stresemann Foundation, and other anti-Shariah NGOs decided to look in on it.

It was a good thing we did. It turned out that the side event was convened to highlight “Guidelines for Educators on Countering Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims: Addressing Islamophobia through Education”, which was published jointly[pdf] by OSCE/ODIHR, the Council of Europe, and UNESCO in 2011. This document — which contains 49 instances of the word “Islamophobia” — was discussed in the ICLA paper, and was part of the focus of our research.

The first forty minutes or so featured presentation by the panelists, including some of the authors of the “Guidelines”. One of them was a British gentleman named Robin Richardson, who is associated with the Runnymede Trust. Among other things, Mr. Richardson told the audience: “We all know that nations are not capable of solving the world’s problems.” Only global institutions were capable of doing so.

His assertion was the last straw. Since the panelists had repeatedly mentioned “Islamophobia” — ICLA’s topic for the week — I decided to speak up. After comments by one other member of the audience, I had my say, and a lengthy discussion ensued, capped by devastating remarks made by Major Stephen Coughlin of CSP.

Below are relevant excerpts from the audio of the occasion. Many thanks to Henrik Ræder Clausen for making the recording, to CSP for the transcript, and to Vlad Tepesfor editing the audio to produce this video:

The full audio of the final 48 minutes is available here, and a complete transcript of that audio is at the bottom of this post.

Transcript of the excerpts:   Continue reading →

More from another quarter:

Burning CAIR’s Islamophobia Report

By Grizzly Joe/American Thinker

This past summer, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) changed its corporate name to Washington Trust Foundation, Inc. (WTF). Last week CAIR/WTFreleased, under the CAIR moniker, “Legislating Fear — Islamophobia and its Impact in the Unites States.” Originally scheduled for release on the day of the Navy Yard shooting massacre, CAIR presumably elected to delay release of the report until they were reasonably certain Jihad played no role in this latest example of workplace violence at an American military facility. Does CAIR seek to suppress the free speech of any group with which it disagrees? Why does CAIR label speech it disagrees with as “Islamophobic”? One could literally write a book critiquing the intellectual shortcomings of the 148-page report. Certainly not written at the reading level of “The 9/11 Commission Report,” it reads more along the lines of a 7th Grade English paper derived from the Cliff Notes version of a Dr. Seuss book. To frame their thesis, CAIR lumps a number of individuals and organizations into an “American Islamophobia…. (Read Full Article)

CAIR’s Islamophobia Meltdown

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On September 30, 2013 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

Two days after the release of a CAIR report claiming to expose the network financing “Islamophobia”, Charles C. Johnson ran his own report documenting CAIR’s convoluted financing schemes.

While the CAIR report attempted to stigmatize terrorism research by reporting on the straightforward funding of organizations and individuals such as Robert Spencer; the Johnson report showed that CAIR, described by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in financing terrorism, had engaged in convoluted methods to conceal its financing sources while laundering money from abroad.

Continue reading The “Islamophobia” Meltdown