“Allah and His Prophets should be Protected from Insult”

Top debate spot for Muslim hardliner

Don’t know what AMP comes into this, but “our” ABC and al BeBeeCeera have long been in the tank for the Islamic expansion project.

EAN HIGGINS /From: The Australian (thanks to Mullah pbuh)

A RESPECTED ethics centre will next week provide a coveted speaking platform to the spokesman for Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir, who has called Australian Diggers in Afghanistan “fair game” whom Muslims had an obligation to attack. The event will be sponsored by AMP, and recorded by the ABC. It will also be broadcast by the BBC.

The event will be sponsored by AMP, and recorded by the ABC. It will also be broadcast by the BBC.

Yet another wankfest organised by a bunch of useful idiots.

SafariScreenSnapz084Uthman Badar, who will take part in the IQ Squared debate put on by the St James Ethics Centre in Sydney, has also called on Muslim Australians to boycott Anzac Day because it celebrates British colonialist attempts to seize Muslim land from the Ottoman Empire.

(Muslim grievances and demands are limitless, Uthman will rattle them off like the pro he is…..)

Mr Badar is the highly vocal media spokesman in Australia for Hizb ut-Tahrir, which rejects Western democratic values and calls for an Islamic caliphate to rule Muslims around the world. The organisation is banned in some countries.

Hizb ut-Tahrir should be banned in Australia and all its members arrested.  Australia should revoke their  citizenship and ship them back to islamistan. But our politprops haven’t got the cojones….

The topic of Thursday’s debate is “God and His Prophets should be Protected from Insult”, and the ethics centre invited Mr Badar to be one of the speakers presenting the case in favour.

The Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim had to pull out as his debating partner at the last minute, and the organisers are looking for a stand-in.

Speaking against the proposition will be author Tom Keneally and the founder of Youth Without Borders, Yassmin Abdel-Magied.

729YassminAbdelMagied-620x349

Tom Keneally knows nothing about Islam, so he is totally out of his debt. Yassmin Abdel-Magied is an affirmative action hijabee who will do her da’awa, as she must…..

Asked in 2011 if he condoned the killing of Australian troops in Afghanistan, Mr Badar replied: “If you are occupying someone else’s land then those victimised people have the right to resist.”

In that case we should reclaim all lands occupied by Muslims and resist any further Islamic expansion projects.
Mr Badar said yesterday he did not plan to stray much from the topic, although he might use sensitivity about Anzac Day as an example of how there were “red lines” in all societies about what was reasonable to say about religious or national icons.

NSW Jewish Board of Deputies chief executive Vic Alhadeff said the selection of Mr Badar was “a blight both on the organisers and on the event itself”.

The ethics centre’s director, Simon Longstaff, said the whole approach of IQ Squared was to grapple with controversial issues through a disciplined, respectful approach. As chairman of the debate, he would not tolerate expressions of hatred or racism.

Which means criticism or the truth about Islam is not tolerated.

“Two sets of ideas run up against each other: whether you should have a broadly unfettered freedom of expression, or you say no, religion ought to have a special kind of respect,” he said.

No. Freedom of speech is non negotiable, you dolt.
The IQ Squared debates are normally broadcast on the ABC’s Big Ideas program, but the show’s executive producer, Peter McEvoy, said this was on a case-by-case basis.

“The ABC captures a wide range of public lectures and debates for Big Ideas,” and broadcasts them “where they meet our editorial standards”.

AMP spokeswoman Jane Anderson said the debates “encourage vigorous discussion” and “can from time-to-time be controversial”.

Muselmaniacs can say anything, but when you criticise Islam you’re out. You don’t  “meet the ABC’s editorial standards…”

“But we are not involved in deciding the topics or the speakers and certainly don’t endorse any of the speakers or their views.”

No, they are just useful idiots promoting the ideology of those who would cut their throats laughing  and screaming allah akbar…

This might surprise you:

God And His Prophets Should Be Protected from Insult

To this day, the laws of most Australian states and territories continue to prohibit blasphemy. For example, in NSW a person may still be prosecuted for the common law offence of blasphemy if their purpose is to engage in “scoffing or reviling”. Put simply, citizens may not mock or insult God or the Prophets. Of course, the possibility of a ‘rap on the knuckles’ from a magistrate may be the least of one’s problems. As Salman Rushdie discovered, perceived religious insults can result in a death sentence – and years of being locked away, protected from Allah’s assassins. So, should God and the Prophets enjoy such protection from insult? Or is it time to expand the scope of protected free speech so that one may mock or insult God and the Prophets without fear of reprisal?

This debate is being filmed by the BBC and broadcast to an estimated 70 million  (Source)

8 thoughts on ““Allah and His Prophets should be Protected from Insult””

  1. Any self respecting god who felt insulted could just send down a lightening bolt.
    Any god needing a fanatical BITA to protect it from insults, is not worthy of the name.
    Thor does not need protection, he has a hammer.

  2. I’m posting this on behalf of Geoff:

    Not surprising for the BBC, given Aaqil Ahmed, a Muslim, is head of Religion and Ethics at the BBC.

    His first act was to cut most Christian programmes. Allah would be cross to see all those Christians singing.

    Sheik, given we can show that Allah is not God, we should look on the bright side.
    The PC Thought Police in the UK will arrest those pesky Muslims for insulting God and his prophets.

    1) Muslims insult God by praying to a false God called Allah
    2) Muslims insult Abraham by calling for all Jews and Christians to be killed.
    3) Muslims insult Moses by flaunting the Ten Commandments on a daily basis
    4) Muslims insult Jesus by ignoring his teachings and calling him Isa who is the great false prophet

    If only.

    Geoff

  3. Islam is an insult to itself. Muslims are an insult to themselves. Both are an insult to humanity, nature and the Earth.

  4. Hello Sheik,

    I just attended the St James ‘ethic’debate.

    Completely shambolic (as you predicted)

    On the positive side we had the muslim boot licker Julian Burnside. & what a jolly good show he put on….eh what????? With him was the Hizb ut Tahrir spokes-nazi- Uthman Badar.

    Uthman refused to answer quesrtions about whether or not he endorsed killings of those who insulted Allah. Plus the usual mental gymnastics and the arrogant belief that he and his fellow sharia merchants deserve a say; in what free speech is, and isn’t.

    Julian reckoned the biggest problem surrounding all this was ‘islamophobia’. naturally he called for an applause when spokes-Nazi Badar came back from a little arse lifting. LOL. The braindead lefty audience obliged with a hearty clap.

    I am now truly convinced these lefties are completely deranged.

    Then we had the hijabee telling outright lies by alleging the prophet put up with insults and never retaliated. basically she endorsed Burnside & Badar- just a lighter version.

    Keneally? barely better.

    According to idiot in cheif – Simon longstaff- Daniel Pipes is…….. controversial.

    God save Australia.

    C U sheik.

    1. Those who support child-marriage, polygamy, FGM, killing of apostates, honour killings, jihad in the way of allah to make the world islamic, are complicit and should be seen as our mortal enemies.

  5. This was not a debate.

    The hijabee on the against side may have well been sitting next to Julian Burnside.

    No one has the right not to be offended- thats freedom of speech. And who determines what can & can’t be said? let me tell you this: religious Nazi’s don’t get a say……period.

    The St James ‘ethics’centre has 100% lost the plot. No platform for fascists and Nazi’s.

    You talk about respect? These Muslims do not respect thae rights of those considered the ‘other’.

    Churches in Afghanistan? None!
    Churches in Saudi arabia? None!

    The countries with the worst human rights track record are all
    most exclusively Muslim.
    Bottom line: Uthman Badar and his like want to shut down freedom of speech, and then kill anyone who breaches their sharia law.

    If Thomas Keneally had a shred of credibility- this is the issue he should have raised, but as usual- as with all leftist outfits such as you and the ABC and fairfax- literally refuse to ask these Muslims any pointed questions.

    You talk about hate and vilification? That is the essence of Hizb ut Tahrirs whole ethos.

    where was your conservative voice…. where????

    Two panels- with either Muslims or their stooges.

    St James is not interested in the truth just repeating the same leftist narrative that I can hear any day, any time in the main stream media.

    Not good enough.

  6. This was not a debate.

    The hijabee on the against side may have well been sitting next to Julian Burnside.

    No one has the right not to be offended- thats freedom of speech. And who determines what can & can’t be said? let me tell you this: religious Nazi’s don’t get a say……period.

    The St James ‘ethics’centre has 100% lost the plot. A platform for fascists and Nazi’s.

    You talk about respect? These Muslims do not respect thae rights of those considered the ‘other’.

    Churches in Afghanistan? None!
    Churches in Saudi arabia? None!

    The countries with the worst human rights track record are all
    most exclusively Muslim.
    Bottom line: Uthman Badar and his like want to shut down freedom of speech, and then kill anyone who breaches their sharia law.

    If Thomas Keneally had a shred of credibility- this is the issue he should have raised, but as usual- as with all leftist outfits such as St James and the ABC and fairfax- literally refuse to ask these Muslims any pointed questions.

    You talk about hate and vilification? That is the essence of Hizb ut Tahrirs whole ethos.

    Where was your conservative voice…. where????

    Two panels- with either Muslims or their stooges.

    St James not interested in the truth just repeating the same leftist narrative that I can hear any day, any time in the main stream media.

    Not good enough.

Comments are closed.