Yusuf vs Freedom of Speech

A Freedom Commissioner? 

THE repeal of the “Andrew Bolt” provisions of the Racial Discrimination Act that make it unlawful to offend and insult people because of their race will be the subject of the first legislation Attorney-General George Brandis will introduce to parliament.

A job for me?

At least one “freedom commissioner” will be appointed next year to protect traditional rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The Australian 

Unsurprisingly, our ‘once we were radical’  author Irfan Yusuf shrieks: 

 freedom of speech extend(s) to God? (A blasphemous debate) and gets his diapers all smelly over Uthman Badar, a hardcore headbanger and PhD student in economics from the University of Western Sydney, “a man whose freedom of speech our erstwhile government wants to take away by banning Hizb ut-Tahrir (“the Party of Liberation”), the organisation Badar represents in Australia.”

Very much so, Yusuf. Very much so. Because treason, subversion and plotting to throw over our elected government is still high crime and not just a misdemeanour, Yusuf. You as a lawyer should know that.

iIn his latest (s)hit piece Yusuf, always the Islamic supremacist, admonishes Senator George Brandis  for “abandoning his own principles  “to protect the weak from the strong” (quite fanciful really, considering that Islamic spokesturds constantly  threaten to wipe us out, that  1.5 gazillion mad muselmaniacs will rise up in anger if we don’t pay the jiziya with willing submission, etc etc…)

Yusuf complains that “for the benefit of Bolt and his employers, Brandis is prepared to abandon his own principles, allowing Bolt to use his substantial power to trample on the weak and vilify minorities.”

Off  your meds again, Yusuf?

Australia’s ‘weak’ and the ‘minorities’ will survive Bolt.  Australia’s few upstanding journo’s who  tell the truth about Islam, those who stood firm against the globull worming racket and the collectivist thugs who took us to the brink, need our support. They are the people who need our protection. They are the people who tell the truth in spite of being vilified for it.  If only the remaining Christians and other minorities in Islamic sandpits would have someone like senator Brandis or Bolt to speak for them!

I’m afraid Irfan, who wrote about his  “Years As A Teenage Islamo-fascist,” never grew out of it.

Of course, he’s  no longer in his teens. We will be left guessing whether the mental baggage of Hizb-ut Tahrir  or his momma’s curry weighs heavier on him.

As long as he’s not on his way to Syria we needn’t be concerned.

 

2 thoughts on “Yusuf vs Freedom of Speech”

  1. “Freedom commisisoners” only become necessary when the moral law (to not attack first) becomes inverted, and the onus reversed to Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent, and where it becomes allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (moslems) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, & so “make” them commit even more crimes!

    No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, & nobody is doing even these moslems any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed People Of Colour”)!

    Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

    Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering individual citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

    Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.

    And this process of creeping, criminally-negligent might-makes-right control is what they call “progress!”

    And so our schools have all become total(itarian) CONFORMIST, group-might-makes-right extortionist indoctrination camps! Alles fur den gruppen! Idolatry! For when groups have rights, real live individual human citizens have none!

  2. “Freedom commissioners” only become necessary when the moral law (to not attack first) becomes inverted, and the onus reversed to Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent, and where it becomes allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (moslems) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, & so “make” them commit even more crimes!

    No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, & nobody is doing even these moslems any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed People Of Colour”)!

    Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

    Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering individual citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

    Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.

    And this process of creeping, criminally-negligent might-makes-right control is what they call “progress!”

    And so our schools have all become total(itarian) CONFORMIST, group-might-makes-right extortionist indoctrination camps! Alles fur den gruppen! Idolatry! For when groups have rights, real live individual human citizens have none!

Comments are closed.