Jihad vs Democracy and Secularism

Great numbers of Islamic spokesturds and their western useful idiots keep telling us about how wonderfully compatible Islam is with democracy. What you will not see is our useless media  call these  agitprops the frauds they are.

Jihad Watch links:

“Are you waging Jihad for the sake of democracy and secularism? You don’t want Allah’s shari’a.”

Note how the ISIS jihadist assumes, and takes for granted that the FSA jihadist will know as well, that democracy and secularism are opposed to Sharia, and that jihad is to be waged for the sake of establishing Sharia. These are elementary points taught by all sects of Islam and schools of Islamic jurisprudence; they’re only obscured by Islamic apologists in the West who want to keep non-Muslims ignorant and complacent about what is happening not only in Syria, but in their own countries.

“FSA, ISIS Fighters Exchange Insults over the Two-Way Radio in the Wake of Aleppo Rebel Infighting,” from MEMRI, n.d.:

“Cooperating is a sin!”

Muslim Brotherhood cleric Qaradawi issues fatwa saying voting in Egypt referendum “is cooperating in a sin” and “religiously forbidden”


This is how the believers are kept in line: not to support the Brotherhood agenda would be a sin for which they’d burn in hell. And so Egyptians who don’t want Sharia and Islamization are threatened with eternal torture. “Brotherhood-linked cleric ‘forbids’ voting in Egypt referendum,” from AFP, January 8:

Muslim Brotherhood-linked cleric Youssef El-Qaradawi has issued a religious edict prohibiting Egyptians from voting in a referendum to be held next week by the interim government.

50 “Activists” Eliminated

Syria: Al-Qaeda executes 50 foes of Sharia and Islamization at hospital

FightinginIdlib.jpgMore mercy and compassion from those who style themselves as the most fervent defenders of the Compassionate and Merciful One. “Syria: al Qaida kills 50 prisoners in Aleppo, activists say,” from ANSAmed, January 7 (thanks to The Religion of Peace)

He was “radicalised” in Gitmo, no doubt:

Former Guantanamo detainee implicated in Benghazi attack


Will the hard-Left lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith, who assured authorities that other Gitmo detainees deemed dangerous were actually harmless, have any comment on this? (I knew Clive slightly when we were both students at the University of North Carolina; Clive, if you’re reading this, send me an email at director[at]jihadwatch.org: I’d love to interview you about Abu Sufian bin Qumu and Guantanamo.)

“Former Guantanamo detainee implicated in Benghazi attack,” by Adam Goldman for the Washington Post, January 7:

U.S. officials suspect a former Guantanamo Bay detainee played a role in the attack on the American compound in Benghazi, Libya, and are planning to designate the group he leads as a foreign terrorism organization, according to officials with the plans.

One thought on “Jihad vs Democracy and Secularism”

  1. Pure, unfettered democracy is only mob-rule, not governed by the rule of law (which isn’t “We obey laws we all voted for and then wrote down!” but really means “We all agree to not attack first – and that statement includes that all groups of people also agree to not attack any individual human citizens first, and all groups includes the largest group, aka the “government” or the “state”)! In a republic, individual human’s rights come first, whereas in a democracy, which is also really only an idolatrous criminal enterprise (i.e: an extortion-ocracy) only the largest might-makes-right group or mob has “rights!”

    And this is exactly why democrats and muslims are a natural fit: both are crime-gangs who pretend to believe in might-makes-right pre-determinism as the best alibi excuse for their own crimes; to libertine liberal democrats, it’s never their fault because they are always really only victims: of society, and helpless products of their environments; and for muslims, the excuse is that they’re all really only helpless slaves of allah!

    And so if you try to give muslims “democracy,” they will invariably “vote” – for more islamic slavery!

Comments are closed.