Former Tea Party congressman Allen WestÂ blastedÂ the “truly disturbing” commercial for “using languages I didn’t recognise”, while conservative radio host Glenn Beck complained that the ad was made to “divide us politically”.
“If you don’t like [the commercial], if you’re offended by it, then you’re a racist. If you do like it, well then you’re for immigration. That’s what it is,” Mr Beck said on the air on Monday,Â SalonÂ reported (source)
Thanks to Pat Dollard Â (& Breitbart)
Screenshot fromÂ Forbes
Flashbacks, 2013: Coca Cola’s Muslim CEO Writes Op-Ed Pushing ‘Immigration Reform’ – Huffington Post, Forbes List Coke As Top Amnesty Supporter
Coca Cola has been on a major amnesty push for at least a year in the hopes that it can obtain cheap labor. And because its CEO Muhtar Kent is aÂ MuslimÂ who was raised in places like Iran and Indonesia, perhaps for even more sinister reasons. Regardless, this push makes it very clear that the Super Bowl ad wasÂ 100% political, designed to influence public opinion, propagandizing the people in favor of immigration ahead of the coming amnesty battle in congress. In the military, this is called a PSYOP (psychological operation). Muhtar is engaging in the amnesty war just like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is. And I’d be curious to know just how much of his salary and Coke’s profits go to Muslim “charities” that are really fronts for terrorist organizations, as most Muslim “charities” are.
- Background:Â Coca-Cola Super Bowl Ad Stirs Controversy With Multilingual Singing Of ‘America The Beautiful’
- Related –Â WATCH – Beck: Coke’s Super Bowl Ad Was An Effort To Demonize Those Opposed To Progressive Immigration Agenda As ‘Racist’
February 28, 2013Â editorial in USA Today by Coca Cola CEO Muhtar Kent, entitled “Immigration Reform Good For Business”:Â Though I’m not an immigrant, I’ve lived certain aspects of the immigrant experience. I was born in New York City when my father was serving as Turkey’s consul general. As he assumed other diplomatic posts, our family lived in Thailand, Poland, Iran, India and elsewhere. In 1978, I returned to New York with a British university degree and a birth certificate in my pocket. A newspaper help-wanted ad led me to a job riding red route trucks and delivering the beverages of The Coca-Cola Co. to retail outlets. I immediately fell in love with the company and my birthplace. I chose to make my life in this country. Being a U.S. citizen by birth, I was fortunate to have that choice.
Many others would like to have the same choice. But they can’t come to America unless they are willing to wade through a daunting bureaucracy, deal with outdated regulations or, when all else fails, enter the shadowy world of undocumented status.
I was lucky
That’s one reason I support immigration reform. As a first-generation American, I know firsthand the blessings of living in this country. As a business leader, I also know we need to make it easier for committed, highly skilled people to make their lives and livelihoods here. Immigration is an essential part of the growth calculus for this great country.
Nearly half of Fortune 500 companies were started by immigrants or their children. Last year, three-quarters of patents coming out of our 10 top research universities were granted to immigrants.
As Washington grapples with much-needed immigration reform, my hope is that our leaders focus on creating a modern system with rational laws and regulations, strong border controls, greater opportunities for skilled foreign-born professionals and a clear way forward for undocumented workers â€” a potential route to U.S. citizenship that bears all the rights, responsibilities and obligations of that coveted status.
A half-century ago, a young chemist came to this country from his native Cuba with little more than $40 and an American college degree. In time, Roberto Goizueta would become chairman of The Coca-Cola Co., creating thousands of new jobs and billions of dollars of shareholder value. Today, we should do everything we can to welcome and retain young people like Roberto.
As we do, we should remember that immigration is not just an American issue. On the contrary, it is a global issue. But the U.S. clearly has a leadership opportunity to promote immigration reform beyond our own borders. For the sake of our economy and the global economy, this leadership cannot come fast enough.
At Coca-Cola, for instance, we operate as a local business in 200-plus countries, hiring, manufacturing and distributing locally. And yet we struggle with the often byzantine processes involved in moving our leaders and their families across borders.
The cost to our business, our people and global business everywhere is immediate â€” and acute. For those countries erecting barriers, however, the cost is even greater as they fail to gain the talent and know-how of experienced workers.
Free ideas, free people
The problem, at its core, is protectionism. Though it might be appealing to think a nation can protect its citizens from competition, the healthiest and most dynamic national economies tend to be those that embrace free ideas, free trade and free people.Â Keep reading
Excerpted fromÂ Huffington Post articleÂ listing top 10 CEOs backing “immigration reform”:
Muhtar Kent, chairman and CEO of The Coca-Cola Co.
Muhtar Kent explained why he thinks immigration reform is good for business in an op-ed he wrote in February. He insisted that “we need to make it easier for committed, highly skilled people to make their lives and livelihoods here.” He also highlighted the economic growth that immigrants generate in the U.S., noting that nearly half of Fortune 500 companies were started by immigrants or their children.
Â Coke to the world
By their ads shall ye know them. The propaganda campagaign on behalf of Diversity â€” apparently something that is not self-evidently wonderful because otherwise why would its putative wonderfulness have to be brought up on every conceivable occasion? â€” was distinctly noticeable in several ofÂ the Superbowl ads. There was that cute-as-a-button little girl, biracial as all get out, pushing her Cheerios and asking her black father and white mother, who have just let her know she’s going to have a little brother, if she can also have a puppy. It’s not just the Cheerios that are being pushed.
Of greater note wasÂ this adÂ for Coca-Cola. The hijabbed sweet-faced presumably guileless and friendly girls who are on display are, according to Coke’s unstated premise, a new and welcome addition to our American quilt. But is that true? When you live in a Western country and are not in fear for your life should you choose not to be hijabbed, the wearing of a hijabÂ can reasonably be taken, by the time you are in your teens, as a conscious sign of submission to Islam, or to the male relatives to whom you must listen (and even be persuaded that Slavery is Freedom), a pledge of allegiance not to America, but to Islam. And the tenets of Islam flatly contradict what is in the American Constitution, including the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. In Islam women are not equal to men, and non-Muslims are not considered equal to Muslims, and at best must be treated as dhimmis, enduring a host of legal and social disabilities. That’s what Coca-Cola was casually celebrating, out of an ignorance that rises to the level of criminal negligence.
The commercial provoked more anger because it briefly depicts a gay couple roller-skating and hugging their daughter.
In an ironic twist, Katharine Lee Bates, who wrote ‘America the Beautiful’ in 1893, lived with another woman for 25 years who may have been her lesbian partner, according to theÂ Huffington Post.