Mohammedanism @ Harfart


“Harvard Law School, one of the most prestigious institutions of its kind in the world, has posted a verse of the “Holy Quraan”  at the entrance of its faculty library, describing the verse as one of the greatest expressions of justice in history.

Verse 135 of Surah Al Nisa (The Women) has been posted at a wall facing the faculty’s main entrance, dedicated to the best phrases articulating justice:”

“O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah , even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives. Whether one is rich or poor, Allah is more worthy of both. So follow not [personal] inclination, lest you not be just. And if you distort [your testimony] or refuse [to give it], then indeed Allah is ever, with what you do, Acquainted”

Geoff sez:

Notice that Harvard didn’t mention that Allah is Satan!
The Quran teaches violence and enforces extreme racism and opposes the Golden Rule.  So much for the integrity of Harvard Law school.
Berkeley students must tweet on Islamophobia
 Prof. Bazian appears to be using his position of authority to make 100 students — mostly non-Muslims — tweet about Muslim victimhood in America, irrespective of how it’s defined or whether it exists.

Aceh mulls sharia for kuffars

Islamic spokesturds in the west keep telling us that the sharia would only apply to Muslims under an Islamic government. The reality is, always, very different:

The Aceh Legislative Council is deliberating a special bylaw that will force non-Muslims in the province to follow sharia. “We hope all women, including non-Muslims, will wear a headscarf,” Samsuddin said. He added that both Muslims and non-Muslims living in Aceh, the only province governed by sharia, should obey the Islamic law.

xp01-bRiot-act.jpg.pagespeed.ic.D6qZk6SAWlSharia police also stopped male motorists — Muslim or non — wearing shorts, warning them to only go out in public wearing pants. According to Qanun No. 11/2002, in public spaces women must wear a headscarf and men are forbidden from wearing shorts above the knee.  “If someone is found in violation [of the Qanun] three times, they might receive harsh punishment, such as being canned in public,” Samsuddin said. (thanks to Mullah)

Indonesia: Catholic priests  terrorized by unidentified men.

Earlier, the priests and their followers staged a demonstration to demand a probe into the murder of former regency head Laurensius Wadu, who was found dead on June 8, last year. Police have named 12 suspects, but so far have only been able to bring four of them to court. Two of the suspects remain in custody while six suspects have been released.

MEMRI Dispatch No. 5633

At Bethlehem Funeral For Suicide Bombers: Praise For Bombers, Calls For Continuing The Resistance

2 thoughts on “Mohammedanism @ Harfart”

  1. WTF does Harvard Law School know about the Law, anyway?! NADA!

    Let’s take a quick trip back through history:

    IN A BEGINNING: What was Abraham against?

    (No, not “Sons!” or “Foreskins!” – at least, not primarily, although he did try to kill one of the first, exiled the other, and amputated all the latter).


    And WHY?

    Because idols (not just the stone kind either, but all static ideas idealized and abstracted away from their dynamic circumstantial situational contexts) are only alibi-excuses with which criminals can attack all others first, in order to maintain their false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, while offloading onto their victims, by blaming them, the only responsibility to become right.

    Idolatry is an attack. It’s a blatant lie.

    Criminals (libertine liberals) want their excuses to apply only to them selves, so they are against objective principles, and in favour of “laws” which embrace subjective double-standards. The only principle they believe in, is relativism – which is by definition the anti-principle.

    Idolatry is fraud, and it’s also a sub-category: fraud against people, aka: slander. And fraud – including slander – is simply lying: the most basic form of theft. All crimes are forms of theft, and crime (/theft) is attacking first: taking from others without any agreed-upon exchange.

    Criminals pretend all forms of theft short of murder ARE valid agreements – “You agree to let us rob you, in exchange for your life/us not killing you!”

    To criminals (liberals, muslims) Submitting to extortion threats IS sanity, and this is specificaly addressed in Sharia “law” (crime). and even murder is wholly justified in might-makes-right islam, if no blood-avengers exist to complain about it.

    And this crime-creed is what Haardvark is embracing and Submits to?!

  2. PS, from:


    Let’s expand the concept of “pre-crime” and see just how many things could be made illegal.

    For Sexual Assault, women must not go out except in the company of their husband or male relative, and must never show cleavage or their legs lest some man will want to rape them… (or how about mandatory gun ownership?)

    So much crime is subsequent to consumption of alcohol, we have to ban that completely.

    People might hurt each other because of their race or religion, so strict separation is in the public interest.

    Crime PREVENTION is not only impossible, it’s an illegal crime in itself!

    Yet this is clearly the sort of fascist gangsterism Harvard Law school wants!

Comments are closed.