"It's not as if we're bringing in an alien and rival system"…

The former Archdimbulb of Canterbury,  Rowan Williams, and Nicholas Phillips, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, both suggested that the UK could consider, in Lord Phillips’s words, “embracing Sharia law”….

separated-at-birth-archbishop-of-canterbury-rowan-williams-and-animal-from-the-muppets“it’s not as if we’re bringing in an alien and rival system”.

From the Religion of Peace:

The Rising Sex Traffic in Forced Islamic Marriage (ME Forum)

The traditional Islamic practice of marriage, combined with the lack of registration, are leaving many girls and women vulnerable to exploitation.

Related:

Camels ‘More Beautiful than Women’…

If you’re in Melbourne for the coming weekend, don’t miss our SION event:

1535562_631783156889447_330747513_n

There is more, you know there is always more:

Indian Imam Sexually Assaults ‘Small Children’ During Class…

Brunei Makes it Illegal to Share Non-Muslim Faith…

UK Taxpayers Could Be On the Hook for FGM…

Man ‘Honor Kills’ Sister-in-Law over Her Husband’s Objections

‘Disadvantaged’ Palestinian Women Sterilized for ‘Honor’…

Dancing Children Among 51 Killed in Nigeria Bombing…

Muslims in UK Sport ‘200 Times’ Higher Rate of Sex Crime…

US Military Using Chaplains from MB-Linked ISNA…

Woman in Full-Face Veil Waved Through Heathrow…

Papuan Christian Children Beaten, Converted to Islam…

Dutch Convert Forms Anti-Gay Political Party…

One thought on “"It's not as if we're bringing in an alien and rival system"…”

  1. Sharia “law” (crime) differs from our laws in that it is the exact opposite of real LAW.

    Our Law is based on negative rights; on the Golden Rule of Law’s simple “Do Not Attack First” principle.

    Islam’s sharia is based on the exact opposite – on what I call the brazen rule of chaos, or basically “It is our holy right and duty to our god to always attack all the infidels first!”

    From this “THOU SHALT KILL!” credo, they inflict distrust, stagnation, and barbarism on them selves and on everyone else.

    Our laws are based on “Everything is forbidden, except that which is specifically agreed to” (between individual humans; i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or FOR you, without getting your express permission to do so, first); while theirs is based on the exact opposite, on “Everything is allowed, except that which is specifically forbidden” i.e: I can take all your stuff if you don’t notice &/or don’t have the force-of-numbers gangster strength to stop me; it’s all us-versus-them, and group-might-made “rights!”

    And extortion is always a crime.

    Islam’s Sharia is either compatable with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

    There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime (‘law’) and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

    There is really only one Qur’an, one islam, and one sharia.

    And islam is inherently against ALL sovereign national countries (which it regards as only temporary man-made false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the global muslim Ummah, ruled by their theocratic Caliphate government) because since the Qur’an and subsequent sharia elaborations embody “god’s” perfect laws which are to apply to all mankind everywhere, why would anyone ever need any merely human legislators (even ‘democratically elected’ ones)?!

    So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its “muslim” members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

    Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

Comments are closed.