The biggest crime of all: Obama Turns Internet Over to Undefined Global Governance

The “international community”, consisting of commie dictatorships and failed Muslim fiefdoms,  have been pushing for this for years.

internet-control

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said even the biased mainstream media cannot justify the ultimate gift that President Barack Obama gave to authoritarian regimes and dictators around the world when he relinquished America’s control of the Internet last Friday. (Breitbart)

Palin said that this “is nothing more than a gift to authoritarian regimes who seek to stifle the freedom the internet gives to voices around the world fighting for basic human rights. No amount of Obama/liberal media spin can justify this.”

“Evidently relinquishing America’s control of the internet via our Icann control of domain names was what Obama meant when he led his adoring followers in those strange, kind of creepy chants of “Yes-We-Can.” Palin wrote in a Facebook post. “Surrendering our control of the internet is a colossal foreign policy error with long term negative repercussions for freedom.”

Palin linked to an article by Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Joel Pollak that explained why this is “the worst thing Obama has done in foreign policy by far.”

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

~ David Rockefeller

 Pamela Geller:

Obama’s next offensive in his war on freedom.

Global governance of the internet. “Global governance?” As in the UN? And who and what drives the UN? The largest world body drives the UN. Bat Ye’or describes the OIC this way, “The OIC is one of the largest intergovernmental organizations in the world. It encompasses 56 Muslim states plus the Palestinian Authority. Spread over four continents, it claims to speak in the name of the ummah (the universal Muslim community), which numbers about 1.3 billion. The OIC’s mission is to unite all Muslims worldwide by rooting them in the Koran and the Sunnah — the core of traditional Islamic civilization and values. It aims at strengthening solidarity and cooperation among all its members, in order to protect the interests of Muslims everywhere and to galvanize the ummah into a unified body.”
The Organization of the Islamic Conference will undoubtedly demand the suppression of websites that “insult Islam” or “encourage hatred,” and they won’t be referring to jihad forums that foment and incites to slaughter.

Atlas readers are well aware  of the goals of the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation. The OIC has already gotten passed a proposal in the UN, backed by Muslim nations, urging the passage of laws around the world protecting religion from criticism. Islam is the only religion specifically named as deserving protection.

Websites like mine are the ones that dare speak of the truth of Islam and report on the jihad and the terrible human rights abuses, the Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu etc. persecution, the suppression of women and children, the murder of non-believers, the brutal imposition of shariah law, Islamic supremacism, academic jihad, social jihad, cultural jihad, shariah finance, stealth jihad and the galloping global jihad. The corrupt media are already subdued and self-censor themselves. The net is all there is.
Back in 2009, Obama threatened such anti-freedom action; I blogged on this. He backed off after the American people and the Congress protested.

There have been no serious complaints about American
stewardship of the Internet, no actual abuses perpetrated by American overseers.
But were we to abdicate this stewardship, a number of difficulties could arise.

Domain names sometimes present political questions. Which side in a civil war should control Pakistan’s Internet domain? Should Israel’s .il be suspended as
punishment for its being an “Apartheid state”? What about Taiwan’s .tw if China announces an attempt to “reabsorb its wayward province”?

Perhaps most serious, control of Internet names could become a lever to impose restrictions on Internet content. Many governments already attempt to
control speech on the Internet. Some years ago, Yahoo! was subject to criminal proceedings in France for allowing Nazi memorabilia to be auctioned on its
website. Britain, Canada, and Australia all have mandatory nationwide blacklists of banned sites, managed by nongovernmental regulators with minimal political oversight. Such blacklists can have unpredictable consequences: Wikipedia was badly degraded to British users for some hours because of a poorly designed censorship system targeting child pornography.

If we give control of the Internet naming infrastructure to an international organization, we must expect attempts to censor the Internet. The Organization of the Islamic Conference will doubtless demand the suppression of websites that “insult Islam” or “encourage hatred,” and a number of European countries may well go along.

Most countries lack our First Amendment tradition, and if we wish to protect the free speech rights of Americans online, we should not allow Internet domain names to be hostage to foreign standards. Many other First World countries already have government-imposed restrictions on Internet speech that we would not contemplate here. Even if Internet governance were shared only with First World democracies, they might urge and ultimately demand that domain operators impose restrictions on content.

And now Obama has done it. He had no right but the tin pot-head has gone and done it.

America’s Internet Surrender
By unilaterally retreating from online oversight, the White House pleased regimes that want to control the Web.

L. Gordon Crovitz, Wall Street Journal

March 18, 2014

The Internet is often described as a miracle of self-regulation, which is almost true.

– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/03/obamas-internet-surrender-fate-worse-death-internet.html/#sthash.MjGxw92m.dpuf

6 thoughts on “The biggest crime of all: Obama Turns Internet Over to Undefined Global Governance”

  1. Yes, Daniel you are correct and the vast majority of the world do not even understand it’s meaning and significance.

  2. THAT SICK, EVIL BASTARD!!!!

    Built by private companies, that swine had no right to give it away to evil!

    This is the beginning of the End.

    Dot Com just went from being DotCommercial to DotCommunist!

    ;-(

  3. From: Partager • 2 days ago

    This is the END! The results of this abdication of, essentially, the INTERNET to the most repressive regimes in the world … Russia and China are the defacto powers who have been pushing for this…is a million times worse than Putin’s aims to re-annex Crimea or Ukraine!

    This is NOT “just” about giving away the power to control domain names!

    The internet WORKS because of the NAMESERVERS scattered around the world but overseen by the USA. They are the master directories that enable us to connect to other websites and web services. They are constantly being changed and updated second to second, literally.

    The authoritarian, repressive countries that already control this push to remove the USA from oversight will be the foxes in the chicken coop as far as ERASING the biggest sites to the smallest sites on the Internet with a few keystrokes.

    The New World dictators will have the literal power, and they will use it, to simply erase pamelageller.com or jihadwatch or the washingtontimes or wnd from the internet. It does not matter if your files are on webservers or even “in the cloud”!

    The masters of the “root zone file” will CONTROL THE WHOLE WORLD!!

    Obama has given the world’s most repressive powers the KEYS to the Kingdom once they can sit at their desks and control from China or Russia or Iran or Turkey what YOU can see on the Internet from Atlanta or Washington, D.C.

    Giving up the “root zone control” means that what Americans, British, French, Germans, Canadians … any “Western democracy” can see or participate in will be entirely controlled and changed from AFAR!

    It is NOT JUST ABOUT “firewalling” western websites from Chinese citizens!!!

    What OBAMA has so ignorantly, arrogantly given away is the FUTURE of the internet as a means of communications, financial independence, freedom of the individual to be an individual via a worldwide communications medium.

    It means that even the biggest internet communications companies, even Google as a search engine can be wiped out in a DAY!

    Control of the “root zone files” means that a few keystrokes can WIPE ANY INTERNET BASED COMPANY OFF THE WORLD MAP!

    Your files, your pages, your blogs, your information, your videos will all be sitting there on your useless webserver or on many different cloud servers but NO ONE will be able to CONNECT to your URL!

    And once this is in effect you will not be back up in a day, a week, a year, or ever when you try to make appeals to the very organization that took you off the world internet in the first place. No SEALS to the rescue, no economic pressure, no sanctions can be imposed over a “virtual” power.

    This is the worst possible fate ever imagined for the internet.
    This is the beginning of something so diabolical and unprecedented and dark and freedom expunging that you have to consider this as an Act of War from the White House on America and all Democracy!

Comments are closed.