Perhaps Samantha Power should enlighten us where in the constitution it says that the U.S. has to do a “huge amount” to protect Muslims who feel ‘vulnerable’. Â In my version of the constitution it doesn’t say that at all. News first:
A halal tax on Easter eggs and Easter bunnies in Australia?Â
Allison Roth was told by Planet Fitness thatÂ her outfit was inappropriate for the gym and was making other customers uncomfortable.–Read moreÂ (thanks to Ken)
- The price for the citizenship given to non-MuslimsÂ is acknowledging the sovereignty of Islam….Â (if the infidels do that, they might just as well accept slave status and hand over their belongings to the Mustards…)
Al-ZawahiriÂ calls for “arbitration”– presumably meaningÂ a reasoned committee of inquiry — to determine who killed the officially-anointed representative of Al-Qaeda in Syria, Al-Suri. But everyone already knows that the killers were suicide-bombers belonging to ISIL, headed by a man who is known as Al-BaghadiAhrar Al-Sham, and the Nusra Front, and all the other groups we in the West identify as “extremist” are not “extremist” enough.
And thus does Mr. Baghdad attack Mr. Syria, and in more ways than one.
Â Muslims need to be protected, says Obama harridan Samantha Power
Can’t remember reading that in the constitution, can you?
“In the world today, we’re seeing far too many victims of ethnic and religiously motivated violence and hate,” says Samantha Power. And that is true. She notes, according to AP, that “there’s a huge amount to be done to protect the Muslims still in Bangui who feel very vulnerable.” Great. But she doesn’t mention the [Robert SpencerÂ Apr 5, 2014] Â Continue Reading Â»