Gradually making Australians subservient to Islam

Non-muslims being forced to wear hijab in Islamic schools

Just imagine a Christian school forcing an oppressive dress code on its staff:  you’d never hear the end of it. In Australia, Muselmaniacs are determined to force the freedom sack on non-muslims, and it seems they are getting away with it. Moreover, they are forcing the infidels to pay (with willing submission while feeling subdued) as the jiziya demands.

Australia’s hijra continues apace

Posted on June 28, 2014 by Eeyore

According to Sam Solomon, author of The Mosque Exposed, and The Modern Day Trojan Horse, on Islamic immigration, the word ‘hijra’ has two meanings. One is for Muslims to move to non-muslim areas for the purpose of making them islamic and two, to increase the degree of islamic adherence in any one place. Both are religiously mandated efforts to make the world Islamic.

In the example below, a libertarian minded person might think that in a muslim school any sort of dress code they want should be what it is you do, if you want the job. The problem however is that somehow muslims have managed to get themselves exempted from dress codes that run contrary to islamic norms, meaning they can wear islamic clothes even if the job requires them not to in the name of religious freedom.

This makes it easier to see this for what it is. The ‘hijra’. A deliberate degree-by-degree raising of the amount of islamic adherence and getting the general public used to being subservient to the demands of the islamic fraction of the population.

Notice how they frame the conflict at the end. That was well done. This is exactly about what religious identity will be allowed. I suspect I know how it will play out.

Thank you Oz-Rita

4 thoughts on “Gradually making Australians subservient to Islam”

  1. We are reaching the breakout phase now, where Muslims are starting to exert influence over the sellouts who form opinion and laws in Australia, out of all proportion to their population in a way that other immigrant never did. Geographically too away from the beachheads of south western Sydney and northern Melbourne with the Bendigo mosque and the mosque to be built right on the Hume highway near Marulan with a miniscule Muslim population, an in your face statement to everyone travelling between the two main cities .

    Muslims are doing what they are supposed to do. It is the turncoat political establishment (Fraser first, Labor more recently and now Abbott. Bishop and Morrison for example) and opinion shaping media clique which is not doing what it should be doing. Fom the Muslim p0int of view though they are doing exactly what is required, having accepted dhimmitude themselves they are obeying their masters rather than losing their heads (which at this stage of Islamization means one’s job)

  2. The case of Bibi Aisha and her age are not in the Holy Quran.
    According to the age after calculation seems to be around 18years,
    Marriageable age changes as time is flowing past, we are 1430 years away from the narrated story, At least our Holy Prophet married her as per the request and permission of both her parents.
    It was Allah will may Allah bless Bibi Aisha.

  3. Who said its in the Koran? And why do you have to lie about your own scriptures?

    According to the Qur’an (Surah 33:21), Muhammad is the pattern of conduct for Muslims. But Muhammad himself married a child-bride:
    Sahih al-Bukhari 3896—Narrated Hisham’s father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Al-Madina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he wrote the marriage (wedding) contract with Aishah when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.

    Sahih al-Bukhari 5158—Narrated Urwa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

    Sahih Muslim 3310—Aisha reported: Allah’s Apostle married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

    Sahih Muslim 3311—Aisha reported that Allah’s Apostle married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

    Sunan Abu Dawud 2116—Aishah said: The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old. (The narrator Sulaiman said: Or six years.) He had intercourse with me when I was nine years old.
    As if Muhammad’s example weren’t bad enough, the Qur’an specifically allows Muslim men to divorce prepubescent girls after having sex with them.

Comments are closed.