Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani Calls….
Those of you who are familiar with the old bigot might remember that once upon a time foolish western media tards wanted to nominate al Sistani for the Nobel Peace Prize. During the occupation,Â Al Sistani refused to ever talk to any
American non Muslim, which he regards as ‘najis’, as you can see on his website.Â Â Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if he comes begging to the Americans to save his miserable ass now.
“Citizens who are able to bear arms and fight terrorists, defending their country and their people and their holy places, should volunteer and join the security forces to achieve this holy purpose,”Â Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani’sÂ representative Sheik Abdulmehdi al-Karbalai announced during Friday prayers in the city of Karbala.“There actually are such religious texts that use the term jihad in the context of calls for armed struggle against non-Muslims”.….an article (in the PuffHo of all places) Â criticizes Tariq Ramadan, Reza Aslan, and Akbar Ahmed for claiming that “Islamic teachings are not responsible for provoking young Muslims to join groups like the Taliban and al Qaeda,”Â and says that “these Muslim scholars still shy away from acknowledging that there actually are such religious texts that use the term jihad in the context of calls for armed struggle against non-Muslims…….
And fighting with the forces of ISIS? Â Â by Hugh Fitzgerald
The Russian government, through its local subsidiary the Chechen government, behaves quite differently from governments in the West. It does not attempt to stop the most fanatical Muslims from leaving. It is glad to have them go off somewhere else and fight other Muslims and likely die. And should they return? Upon re-entry, likeÂ defective satellites, they can always be made to self-destruct.
And will certainly defend against any ISIS-led Sunni assault on Karbala or Najaf, which Al-Baghdadi claims are among his intended targets. Â The report on Iranians in Tikrit isÂ here.
The same sinister monotonous threats, and taking of pleasure in the humiliation of Infidels, wherever they may be, on viewÂ here.
This means that readers are beginning to get, still in confused because insufficiently explained fashion, the rules of Shari’a, the rules based on Qur’an and Hadith. And that will help them understand more, about the texts, tenets, attittudes, and atmospherics, of Islam. —Here.
“Jihadists”? Expect Obama to get a strongly-worded letter from CIA chief John Brennan, who said in 2010 that jihadists were not jihadists: “They are not jihadists, for jihad is a holy struggle, an effort to purify for a legitimate purpose, and there is nothing â€” absolutely nothing â€” holy or pure or legitimate or Islamic […]Continue Reading Â»