Missing Out On Honour Killing Talk

valerieValerie Wangnet wants to hear it. She wants to hear why adulterous women should be stoned to death. She wants to hear why daughters who don’t wear hijab or have infidel boyfriends should be murdered by their parents.

She also believes that ‘an ideology should never be imposed onto a person ‘

That’s not how Islam works. Needless to mention that Valerie (also) suggests we should Vote Labor (Because Redheads are Sexy)

Honour killing talk: we should be allowed to hear it

“I’m just really disappointed that we have people in Australia who outright assume things and then attack their character and background.”

Strange. When Geert Wilders applied for a visa and Muslim groups were protesting about it we didn’t hear a beep from Valerie Wangnet.

Valerie Wangnet is the founder and director of ThinkKind, a humane education initiative to encourage kindness and compassion in students through critical thinking and moral reasoning. 

Here’s the anti-dote to this rubbish:

This self-loathing insults Australian values  (Andrew Bolt)

THE Sydney Opera House is Australia’s most iconic building. And on its stage in August was to be a taxpayer-funded talk: “Honour killings are morally justified.”

Be clear: the title is not a question but a statement.

Yes, in the heart of Australia we are now to rationalise the strangling, stoning, burning, beating or shooting of daughters and wives for supposedly shaming their men.

There hasn’t been such a startling symbol of our cultural elite’s loathing of our society and its weakening of our resistance to barbarity. Our civilisation is being betrayed.

In this case, Uthman Badar was invited by Sydney Opera House and the St James Ethics Centre for their Festival of Dangerous Ideas, and planned to attack critics of honour killings as the usual “secular (white) Westerner”, wickedly using these murders as a symbol of “everything that is allegedly wrong with the other culture”. Note: honour killings are only “allegedly wrong”.

Yes, to see Westerners criticise an “Oriental” woman-killer was to see “the powerful condemn the powerless”, according to the blurb approved by Badar. Pity those powerless murderers.

Note one further sinister thing. The festival gave Badar this platform even though he is spokesman for the Islamist extremist Hizb ut-Tahrir, at war with almost every important value and freedom we have.

Indeed, a speaker at its annual conference in Sydney last year told the 600-strong audience there was “a war on Islam — a war that is being waged in this country as it is in the rest of the world”. But that war seems more waged by Islam than on it. Hizb ut-Tahrir, for instance, backs jihadists fighting in Syria, supports terror attacks on Israel, refuses to condemn attacks on our soldiers in Afghanistan, wants laws against criticising Islam and demands Australians live under Sharia law.

Hizb ut-Tahrir, banned in some countries, last week even excused the ISIS terrorists now shooting and beheading unarmed Iraqi prisoners as just Muslims “forced to react” to the “oppression” caused by “Western violence”.

So why was such a malevolent group privileged with a spot in the festival? The Opera House has now cancelled Badar’s speech, but only on the grounds that his critics misunderstood the poor man. (Depressingly, not one critic was a prominent Muslim.)

As the Opera House put it, “a line has been crossed” by giving the lecture its “provocative” title, because “it is clear from the public reaction that the title has given the wrong impression of what Mr Badar intended to discuss”.

We are now asked to believe a talk entitled “Honour killings are morally justified” would say something different, although the organisers and Badar haven’t said what. The Opera House merely asserts neither Badar nor the organisers “in any way advocate honour killings” — and it cancels the talk it claims would have said the same.

How curious.

In fact, this blaming of the critics is terribly familiar. Our cultural elite doesn’t condone Islamic extremists; it just attacks those who condemn them. Example: when Dutch political leader Geert Wilders toured Australia last year to warn against the Islamist threat to our freedoms and safety, he was vilified even by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry for allegedly “inciting hatred and animosity”. Example: when I criticised our leading Islamic apologist, ABC presenter Waleed Aly, for refusing to identify Nigeria’s Boko Haram as Islamist or blame it for kidnapping schoolgirls, I was damned by the ABC’s religious affairs editor as “mad”, “lunatic”, “maniacal” and “idolatrous”.

OR take Ann Mossop, co-curator of the festival that invited Badar. She has repeatedly tweeted support for an activist who defaced posters protesting against jihadist attacks on Israel with the slogan: “In any war between the civilised and the savage, support the civilised man.”

Indeed, in this cultural war, the support too often is for the savage and our will to resist is white-anted by a self-loathing of one of the richest, safest and most free societies the world has seen.

“We have a reputation at the moment as being one of the nastiest countries in the world,” feminist Eva Cox declared on the ABC’s Q&A this week. Australia has a “racist” Constitution and a “very dark past, a brutal history of dispossession, theft and slaughter”, claims Australian of the Year Adam Goodes.

Our Anzac dead were just “killed or wounded while their country engaged them in the business of killing”, Tasmanian Governor Peter Underwood reproached Dawn Service mourners this year.

Yes, we have such rotten values that we should be more open to imported ones.

Honour killings, anyone? For a cultural elite with a death wish, it almost makes sense.

2 thoughts on “Missing Out On Honour Killing Talk”

  1. I want to hear Badar speak. I want to see a straight-talking korangutan justify his fetid beliefs. And if that paints islam in a bad light, we’ll just have to cope with that somehow 😉

Comments are closed.