"Supporters of sharia law are "maniacs and depraved humans" who will not stop committing "cold-blooded butchery and rapes until every woman in Australia wears a burka"

Senator Lambie says sharia supporters are ‘maniacs and depraved humans’
.

That’s pretty spot on. Now show me those who disagree and I’ll show you a bunch of morons, hypocrites and  sellouts:

.

Senator Lambie says sharia supporters are ‘maniacs and depraved humans’

JACQUI Lambie wants the burqa banned from all public places and hopes MPs are given a conscience vote on the issue.–NEWS.COM.AU

Abbott did it:

“….It’s an ugly, criminal incident that occurred for whatever ­reason, but to use it to instil fear in the hearts and minds of people….”

Demented swine:

“…why is our leader Tony Abbott and the Liberal Party doing this to divide our community?” said Mr Abu Yusuf, spokesman for the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamah conference held at an Islamic centre in Melbourne’s northern suburbs yesterday.

.
I DO a daily show with Steve Price on Sydney’s 2GB, which ABC presenters sneer is a “shock jock” station demonising Muslims.-HERALDSUN.COM.AU

This is a 2011 news article concerning the Islamic push to bring Sharia Law in to Australia.

It continues unabated.

.
THE push to introduce sharia law into Australia by the country’s peak Muslim body is a vindication of Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi, who was vilified last year for warning of the creeping infiltration of the Islamic legal system.–HERALDSUN.COM.AU

2 thoughts on “"Supporters of sharia law are "maniacs and depraved humans" who will not stop committing "cold-blooded butchery and rapes until every woman in Australia wears a burka"”

  1. The key problem is that radical Islam, by its own admission in venues too numerous to count, views itself as the ONLY permissible religion, above ALL other religions and ideologies, and Shari’a as a law above ALL laws. There is not even a pretense of ay “legal pluralism” here. Islam is supposed to be dominant by decree, and everything ought to bow to it. Which creates an interesting problem — litigation between Muslim and non-Muslim. By which law? By which court? In which cases? Technically I suppose the non-Muslim should bow to superior Islamic legal authority automatically, defer to it, and shut up or else. And guess what. Many of us have the following reaction — that is the attitude of a country and a people that has suffered major defeat in a great war and is under occupation authority. Yet no country has suffered such devastating defeat, or is under Islamic occupation authority. In your dreams. You want to enjoy that kind of dominance? You want to dominate absolutely, as if you already had your religiously superior sandalled foot on the necks of cowering slaves and captives? You will have to fight for it, and it will be a hard fight beyond the worst of your imagination. Such a degree of thirst for absolute and unquestioned domination elicits absolute resistance. No retreat, no surrender, no prisoners. Ever. Under any circumstances.

Comments are closed.