‘Hate Speech’ is Not Only the Left’s Term for ‘Opposing Viewpoints’

“… no point importing trouble-makers from overseas?”

Tony Abbott - bike helmet

Abbott wants powers to ban preachers of terror

“By all means let Australians who want to say stupid things say stupid things, but there’s no point importing trouble-makers from overseas to stir people up and that’s what I want to see in place very, very swiftly…”

No way. This is the kind of BS-legislation concocted by successive British gubmints under BLiar, Brown and Comoron. These so called “hate-speech laws” allow Islamo-pandering polit-clowns to keep truth-tellers like Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller out and allow the worst Islamic headchoppers to move about freely. Nobody in his right mind should support this.

06082014-ARAB-offence-S.png

Silence is consent

Every Tom, Dick and Henrietta from the PM down rallies in support of orthodox Muslims  Islamic headchoppers who proudly prance around in black body bags, signalling all and sundry how proudly fundamentalist Islamic they are (and how much they hate us.)

In contrast this is what comes out of Australian schools:

Dear Parents,

As a result of the recent heightened security status in Australia, a number of Schools with Cadet Units have decided that Cadets should not travel on public transport in Cadet uniform. Ivanhoe Grammar School has decided to adopt this policy at least up until the end of ECP. This means that Cadets should bring their uniform to school in an Ivanhoe bag and change during the day.

Cadets travelling in private cars can continue to wear their Cadet uniform.

With best wishes,

David Waugh
Commanding Officer Cadet Unit

Young defence cadets warned not to wear uniforms in public amid terrorism fears

143495-e85269f6-4e03-11e4-930e-e515789c51beCall or write to your political rep and to your local newspaper. Silence is consent.

Andrew Bolt:

Why are Rifi’s bigots free but Brandis’s “bigots” muzzled?

Attorney-General George Brandis in March on why the Racial Discrimination Act should be reformed to permit more debate on, say, Middle Eastern culture, immigration and faith:

People do have a right to be bigots, you know. People have the right to say things that other people would find insulting, offensive or bigoted.

Muslim community leader Jamal Rifi last night on why new terrorism laws should not be used to ban the extremist Hizb ut-Tahrir, an Islamist import from the Middle East:

We should hold the view that even bigots have the right to be bigots and Hizb ut-Tahrir is the same as any other group: they are entitled to their view and should be able to express it.

Both men say the same thing, and both are right.  The difference is that the Left and much of the media vilified Brandis, but will side with Rifi, who defends Hizb ut-Tahrir’s freedom of speech but demanded the rest of us stay muzzled.

To be consistent the Government is left with this choice: either allow free speech not just for Islamist extremists but for critics of Islam and its adherents; or crack down on both.  Right now it seem Hizb ut-Tahrir has in practice more freedom to speak than do its critics.

Some blog entries you may have missed:

.
…a mass email went out at Yale University (my alma mater) protesting an upcoming visit from Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a political activist and staunch critic of Islam….PJMEDIA.COM
.
Islamic State’s head-chopping barbarity is not different from everyday Islamic cruelty, says Prof. Rafi Israeli. ISRAELNATIONALNEWS.COM
.
Why would ISIL be listening to this dog?
.
Headchoppers calling on fellow savages to spare a kafir’s life? What’s in it for them?
For infidel consumption:  “prominent Muslim Imams and Islamic scholars have made an impassioned video appeal to the Islamic State (Isis) calling on the immediate and unconditional release…”– we know how that ended, don’t we?
.
The Islamic State is not innovating in this any more than they are in anything else. Saudi Arabia and Iran, both Sharia states, have religious police now to make sure…
JIHAD WATCH
Muslim holy man explains how enjoyable it is to kill a kafir:

Muslim Cleric Explains how to Kill Infidels: “You TAKE THE SWORD. you PLACE THE HEAD LIKE THIS and then you ENJOY YOURSELF WITH IT”

“And it is the SLITTING OF THE THROAT'” the cleric continues as the listeners watch with smiles as he takes his hand like a blade and motions back and forth against his neck….

“not its SEVERING. Pay attention! SLITTING.'”See More

Muslim Cleric Explains how to Kill Infidels: “You TAKE THE SWORD. you PLACE THE HEAD LIKE THIS and then you ENJOY YOURSELF WITH IT"</p><br /> <p>"It is shameful! He's not a ram (or sheep)," the cleric said [It's shameful to slaughter an infidel as one would halal slaughter an animal, No it must not be that 'merciful'] The cleric then added, "He said, 'Kill him well.' Yes, 'Kill him well' and make him get a taste of his own deeds."</p><br /> <p>It appears the cleric is interrupted by a question, to which he responds, "Not in this (inaudible), Not by slaughter."  Then he turns to exactly how to kill those who oppose Islam, asking "Did he say, 'a strike'? No, he didn't say, 'a strike.'"</p><br /> <p>Upon saying these words, he seeks to demonstrate how to kill the infidels. The cleric stands up, takes his sword in hand and declares, "This means you take the sword, you place the head like this, and then you enjoy yourself with it."</p><br /> <p>He then simulates the motion of slowly cutting through the neck of the victim saying "DO NOT SLAUGHTER HIM YET" and as he pulls back on the sword amidst LAUGHTER  from his  DISCIPLES, he declares, "START AGAIN… NO, NOT YET, RETRACT THE KNIFE … and striking the necks… striking… until (inaudible)."</p><br /> <p>"He said, 'And it is the SLITTING OF THE THROAT'" the cleric continued as the listeners watch with SMILES as he takes his hand like a blade and motions BACK AND FORTH AGAINST HIS NECK….</p><br /> <p>NOT its SEVERING. Pay attention! 'SLITTING.'"</p><br /> <p>While the video's title speaks of beheading, the cleric is clearly not teaching that, even by translation, unless I'm missing something. He clearly says not to "sever." However, since one is "enjoying themselves" and are full of the demonic teachings of Islam, why should one stop at mere slitting? Why should they not enjoy themselves, completely behead their victim and then hold it up, even let their children hold it up and display it or put it on a pole? After all, isn't that following in the footsteps of Mohammed? He did it.</p><br /> <p>Watching this guy talk about murdering innocent people and people LOOKING ON AND LAUGHING is so surreal, almost to the point of feeling like you stepped into the Twilight Zone.</p><br /> <p>My friends, this is Islam in all its infamous glory. This is what it has in store for every last infidel who will not submit to it. </p><br /> <p>While some say Islam is in need of reform, I say that Islam is in need of destruction. It is a vile, perverted totalitarian system that enslaves men and women and men are taught to treat their fellow human beings as less than animals ~ Freedom Outpost</p><br /> <p>So whilst halal slaughter is utterly cruel and barbaric. This 'cleric' suggests that nothing so merciful should be meted out to the INFIDELS when they (the barbarians) get their hands on them ~ yes folks that's YOU and ME. It's worth considering because it won't always be someone else's throat they will be slitting; someone else's agony they will be enjoying...</p><br /> <p>Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/muslim-cleric-explains-how-to-kill-infidels-you-take-the-sword-you-place-the-head-like-this-and-then-you-enjoy-yourself-with-it/#8vSClPZsVd1mqico.99</p><br /> <p>H/T Timothy O'Callaghan

Muslim Cleric Explains how to Kill Infidels: “You TAKE THE SWORD. you PLACE THE HEAD LIKE THIS and then you ENJOY YOURSELF WITH IT”

“It is shameful! He’s not a ram (or sheep),” the cleric said [It’s shameful to slaughter an infidel as one would halal slaughter an animal, No it must not be that ‘merciful’] The cleric then added, “He said, ‘Kill him well.’ Yes, ‘Kill him well’ and make him get a taste of his own deeds.”

It appears the cleric is interrupted by a question, to which he responds, “Not in this (inaudible), Not by slaughter.” Then he turns to exactly how to kill those who oppose Islam, asking “Did he say, ‘a strike’? No, he didn’t say, ‘a strike.'”

Upon saying these words, he seeks to demonstrate how to kill the infidels. The cleric stands up, takes his sword in hand and declares, “This means you take the sword, you place the head like this, and then you enjoy yourself with it.”

He then simulates the motion of slowly cutting through the neck of the victim saying “DO NOT SLAUGHTER HIM YET” and as he pulls back on the sword amidst LAUGHTER from his DISCIPLES, he declares, “START AGAIN… NO, NOT YET, RETRACT THE KNIFE … and striking the necks… striking… until (inaudible).”

“He said, ‘And it is the SLITTING OF THE THROAT'” the cleric continued as the listeners watch with SMILES as he takes his hand like a blade and motions BACK AND FORTH AGAINST HIS NECK….

NOT its SEVERING. Pay attention! ‘SLITTING.'”

While the video’s title speaks of beheading, the cleric is clearly not teaching that, even by translation, unless I’m missing something. He clearly says not to “sever.” However, since one is “enjoying themselves” and are full of the demonic teachings of Islam, why should one stop at mere slitting? Why should they not enjoy themselves, completely behead their victim and then hold it up, even let their children hold it up and display it or put it on a pole? After all, isn’t that following in the footsteps of Mohammed? He did it.

Watching this guy talk about murdering innocent people and people LOOKING ON AND LAUGHING is so surreal, almost to the point of feeling like you stepped into the Twilight Zone.

My friends, this is Islam in all its infamous glory. This is what it has in store for every last infidel who will not submit to it.

While some say Islam is in need of reform, I say that Islam is in need of destruction. It is a vile, perverted totalitarian system that enslaves men and women and men are taught to treat their fellow human beings as less than animals ~ Freedom Outpost

So whilst halal slaughter is utterly cruel and barbaric. This ‘cleric’ suggests that nothing so merciful should be meted out to the INFIDELS when they (the barbarians) get their hands on them ~ yes folks that’s YOU and ME. It’s worth considering because it won’t always be someone else’s throat they will be slitting; someone else’s agony they will be enjoying…

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/muslim-cleric-explains-how-to-kill-infidels-you-take-the-sword-you-place-the-head-like-this-and-then-you-enjoy-yourself-with-it/#8vSClPZsVd1mqico.99

H/T Timothy O’Callaghan

Muslim Cleric Explains how to Kill Infidels: “You TAKE THE SWORD. you PLACE THE HEAD LIKE THIS and then you ENJOY YOURSELF WITH IT”

One thought on “‘Hate Speech’ is Not Only the Left’s Term for ‘Opposing Viewpoints’”

  1. The time comes when ….
    Any Each Every Muhammadan SHOT on sight
    (Muhammadan = Male Female Child Dhimmi)

    TOLERATING THE INTOLERANT INTOLERABLE & MALEVOLENT CRIMINAL MUHAMMADANS HAS STOPPED

    And Australians ….
    Are Ensuring the following steps are carried out ….
    1. Incarcerate all Australian Politician and Political Criminals who are Assisting/Enabling ISLAM and who are Traitors/Seditionists against Australia.
    2. Stop ALL Muhammadan immigration to Australia.
    3. Expel ALL Muhammadans -(after Sterilisation)- from Australia.
    4. “Expel” ALL unwilling to go Muhammadans.
    5. Bulldoze ALL islam’s “Mostgrotesques” Mosques.
    6. Expel ALL -(survived their incarceration)- “Dhimmis” from Australia.
    7. “Expel” ALL unwilling to go -(survived their incarceration)- “Dhimmis”.

Comments are closed.