Almost all of Australia’s Islamic State Mo muppets were previously members of the bludjahideen:
A federal investigation into the welfare status of Australian foreign fighters, prompted last year by revelations in The Telegraph, shows 96 per cent had been on welfare benefits when they fled to the Middle East.
Most had continued to collect payments from Australian taxpayers while training with Islamic State to become terrorists intent on wanting to kill Australians.
One of those idiots, who is now attempting to return home after six months in Syria, recently described his pathetic cause:
After more than seven months gaining his trust, CBS News correspondent Clarissa Ward convinced Ibrahim, believed to be in his early 30s, to sit down for an interview and provide a window into the workings of the murderous group …
“Some of the policies, like I said, with the beheadings of non-combatants. Some of those things I don’t agree with.”
What he did agree with though was the barbaric killings that took place in the name of Sharia law.
Ibrahim said he had witnessed a number of executions while in Syria, including a crucifixion and the stoning of a couple who were accused by local officials of adultery.
“It’s harsh. It’s real. But it’s Sharia,” he said.
“It was done publicly, there were many hundreds of people there. Seeing someone die is not something anyone probably would want to see, but having the actual Sharia established is what many Muslims look forward to.”
Not that this is anything to do with Islam, of course.
A warning from Andrew Bolt:
I have learned of attacks on free speech – regretfully successful in part – that have truly shocked me.
I cannot yet reveal them, given the extreme sensitivity involved. But if the public knew the full extent of the danger, there’d be a lot more than the 39 per cent in this poll:
FREEDOM of speech is the human right that Australians feel is most under threat, according to a new poll released today by Ipsos MORI.
The next most frequent response was ‘basic human rights’, which came in at 32 per cent.
According to Julian Burnside AO QC, “the real threat” to Australia’s way of life comes from the Prime Minister and a News Corp columnist:
Muslim Spokesturd: “But Let’s Not Jump To Conclusions”
Unlike, say, the case in Chapel Hill, where jumping to conclusions, as long as those conclusions are that an “anti-Muslim hate crime” was committed, was not only fine, but required.
The FBI is probing a frightening Valentine’s Day attack near Detroit, where a suspect stabbed two men after they told him they were not Muslim, to determine if the attack was a hate crime or even the work of a home-grown radical, a former Motor City FBI chief said Tuesday.
….an argument started over “bad breath and bad teeth” before it “deescalated to a physical altercation.”
Sure. A parking dispute shooting is a hate crime despite a complete lack of evidence. But stabbing someone after they said they were non-Muslims isn’t.
Is Criticism of Islam a Hate Crime?
After every terrorist attack, the news goes through the usual checklist of excuses. Muslims aren’t responsible. It had nothing to do with Islam. Asking Muslims to condemn or disassociate themselves from the attack is racist and you should be ashamed of yourself for even asking them to do it.
Sandwiched between Muslim killings of non-Muslims, the Chapel Hill shootings have become a rare opportunity for Muslims and their allies to play the victim.
Blaming New Atheists for the Chapel Hill shootings may be wildly dishonest, but so is pretending that Islam has nothing to do with the Islamic State.
Atheism in the Muslim world is a crime. The Islamopologist attempt to treat atheism as proof of a hate crime imports the theocracy of Islamic law into the United States. And if it is allowed to stand, how long until Christian criticism of Islam suffers the same fate so that the only allowable attitudes to Islam are either belief or the mindless secular admiration that politicians and reporters display all the time?
Criticism of Islam, obnoxious or otherwise, is legal in the United States. It is illegal in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Gaza and Iran. Recently we’ve seen Muslim efforts to impose this law through murder in Paris and Copenhagen. What the terrorists have tried to do to Charlie Hebdo by force, the Islamopologists are attempting to do here by associating the New Atheists with a crime they did not commit.