Japan not so keen on Islamic migration

Japan accepts just 11 asylum seekers from record 5,000 applications in 2014

The question is who is a refugee? Who is an asylum seeker?

The western world has been overrun with third world welfare seekers and Mohammedan missionary bandits, few of them of any benefit to civilised society. That Japan should be forced to import large numbers of unassimilable Muselmaniacs is preposterous.

Every self-respecting nation on earth should follow Japan on this issue. Signing a treaty is not a suicide pact.

Self-preservation overrides all other concerns.

TOKYO — Japan Today

Japan accepted 11 asylum seekers out of a record 5,000 applications in 2014, Ministry of Justice data showed, drawing criticism from advocates and lawyers that the country is not doing enough to provide protection to refugees.

Tokyo-Camii-mosque-f3
The Tokyo Camii mosque doubles as the Turkish Culture Centre

The number of asylum applications rose 53% from the previous year, while the refugee recognition rate was 0.2%, one of the lowest among industrialised economies.

“The low recognition rate is shameful,” said immigration lawyer Shogo Watanabe.

In 2013, Japan accepted six refugees, its lowest for 15 years.

Six Mohammedans can do a lot of damage.

There is no reason why Japan should allow Mohammedanism to spread in Japan. Despite a restrictive immigration policy there are already more than 100.000 Muslims who have somehow managed to settle in Japan.  There are numerous mosques (beachheads) to spread the ideology of hate.

A lack of planning for the protection and resettlement of refugees, as well as dysfunction in the system that processes asylum claims, was behind the low intake, said Mieko Ishikawa, director of Forum for Refugees Japan.

“There’s no comprehensive policy on the part of the government, and there are gaps in the system’s transparency, efficiency and independence,” she said.

Germany and the United States were the largest destinations for asylum seekers in 2013, receiving 109,580 and 88,360 applications respectively, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees data shows.

Tokyo’s refugee recognition rate is only a fraction of the global 2013 average of 32%.

“No other developed refugee jurisdiction has such as consistently low rate,” said Brian Barbour of the Japan Association for Refugees.

The sharp increase is in part down to the attractiveness of Japan to foreign workers, some of whom claim asylum to stay in the country, say immigration officials.

Asylum applications have risen nearly four-fold since 2010, when legal changes gave re-applicants the right to work as their claims were judged.

“Most people aren’t coming for political reasons. In countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka, many people think they can come to Japan to work,” said Hiroshi Kimizuka, director of refugee recognition at the Ministry of Justice.

A labor shortage has pushed Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government to expand a “trainee” program for manual workers that has been criticized for poor conditions and human rights abuses. The government has also sought to attract white collar foreigners, while insisting that the measures are not an “immigration policy”.

3 thoughts on “Japan not so keen on Islamic migration”

  1. Not taking more than 11 muslim refugees is a very sensible decision taken by Japanese leaders.

  2. Japan could prioritise Buddhist refugees who are fleeing from Indonesia, Malaysia and Bangladesh as those countries become every more Islamic and the Muslims ever more aggressive and oppressive.

Comments are closed.