An interview with Daniel Pipes

BOMBASTIC POLITICS? Ft. Daniel Pipes, President of the Middle East Forum

Thanks to Vlad Tepes

The comment below about this video from RT is nothing short of hyperbolic. The nagging interviewer should not be seen as representative of all Russian females. Pipes keeps a straight face and plays the good boy:

Opponents of the recent deal with Tehran have argued that it will inevitably lead to an Iran itching to unleash nuclear warfare on the world. And though it agreed, in principle, to the most intrusive inspections regime in history, the hawks in Washington seem unwilling to accept anything short of capitulation. How viable is the military option in the case of Iran, and is there a win-win scenario that would satisfy the hardliners on both sides of the negotiating table? Oksana is joined by Daniel Pipes, the President of the Middle East Forum, to examine these issues.  Published on Apr 12, 2015

6 thoughts on “An interview with Daniel Pipes”

  1. Saw the interview on RT. Oksana is light in general, and was never a match for Daniel Pipes. But its good that Daniel did not overpower her, for he then nevere be invited on RT.

    Sheikh. On your reply to my comment on the New Crusade.

    Yes, there is the price that because of the instability that we have created in the Muslim countries, hundreds of thousands of Muslims are seeking asylum in the West. But if we closed the borders to Muslims, then we would be admitting that we are waging a war on Islam – a new Crusades. That would be very difficult to pass in the Liberal West – even among people who are on our side.
    That is the price we are paying for waging war on Islam (a new Crusade), but denying that we are. However, even the current Muslim immigration ,will be slowed on other grounds – viz, Switzerland, on grounds of Climate Change ( a really brilliant idea, which even the Left is finding difficult to oppose).

    We are in the first phase of the new Crusades. This is going to go on for another 40 years at the least – atleast on current plans. But in the end islam will have to reform. And a reformed Islam will not be Islam, and will be dead.

    Muslims see the war the secular West is waging on them as a religious war, i.e., a Christian war against Islam. They are wrong of course. But regardless, we will win, as we are right, as well as being far more powerful in every sense.
    Islam is a Big Mistake in every way – spiritually, intellectually, economically, militarily. It has maintained itself by Terror, as that is the only way it can. And that is why the Koran tells them to engage in Terror.

    I see Muslim countries becoming Christian, as that is the best for them in every sense. Muslims themselves will convert to Christianity, as they will see it as the stronger horse. They view this war as Christianity vs Islam, and they will join the stronger ie victorious team. Everyone wants to be on the winning side.( This is what Ossama BinL was afraid of, and thus the attack on 9/11).

    Of course Christianity is not waging a war on Islam. This is a misconception among Muslims, but that is how it is. It may even turn out to be useful, as a secular atheist West has nothing spiritual to offer Muslims to replace Islam. Man does not live by bread alone.
    ————————————————-
    Thanks for replying. Your blog is really good. Dont how you have kept going when so many others have burnt out. I remember you from LGF days.

  2. I am not so optimistic about victory over Islam. I expect balkanization of the West and a more violent unstable West. Countries such as Sweden, Belgium, southern France, if not all of France, will be Muslim majority, Demographics rule. Muslims are block voters more than any other group. Look at Africa. Nigeria is now more than 50% muslim and has elected a pious Muslim as President. Muslims are entering political office, just look at Obama (I kid!). Their very presence makes it practically impossible to discuss the Islamic threat.

    What we should be doing is promoting abandonment of Islam and protecting those who want to leave and harshly expelling any Muslim or Muslim group who have a problem with ex Muslims leaving Islam. The idea of punishment for leaving a religion is ridiculous by itself.

    1. “Nigeria is now more than 50% muslim and has elected a pious Muslim as President.” — We will never know if this pious Muslim was truly “elected” since the previous ruler was under great pressure by the Obama regime to step down.Obama did the same in the Ivory Coast, which is 80% Christian but now ruled by a Muslim. This was also tried in the CAR, but there the Christians drove the Muslims out. Obama still drives the Islamisation of Kenya and several other places, he has made enormous efforts to advance the spread of Islam.

      1. Well the Great American people elected him – not once but twice.

        America is also responsible for foisting multicultism on Europe – an instrument to destroy Europe, so it never became a challenge to America. Success so far, but in the process America is destroying irself.

    2. Jan Sobieski (pbuh) wrote..

      What we should be doing is promoting abandonment of Islam and protecting those who want to leave and harshly expelling any Muslim or Muslim group who have a problem with ex Muslims leaving Islam. The idea of punishment for leaving a religion is ridiculous by itself.

      Correct.

      But in the meantime, impress on Muslims worldwide, that the Islam horse is not even a horse but a donkey, and will always to lose to the West – militarily. The military aspect is very important, as force of arms is the measure of success in Muslim eyes.

      Islam has openly challenged the West. They are going to lose.

      1. “America is not, and will never be, at war with Islam” – Barry Soetoro aka Hussein Obama

Comments are closed.