Australian Responsibilities

The Freedom of Muslims

Is it responsible for our government to prevent ISIS followers from leaving Australia?

The Australian Government prefers to increase the terror risk here, rather than risk the lives of Allah’s most devout?

It seems as though Julie Bishop is infringing on a Muslim’s freedom to practise their religion by not allowing them to answer the call of Jihad.See More

Police fear travel bans on IS followers could see them switch their focus to local attacks
POLICE fear unknown young Islamic State sympathisers in Melbourne are plotting violent attacks against them.
The Return of the Hijab Rippers

Islamic State recruiter Mr Prakash has called on Australian Muslims to “rise” and attack the Australian kuffar.
“You must start attacking before they attack you.”

Mr Prakash is also under the illusion that he is some kind of champion of women’s rights, calling on “brothers at home” to avenge the attacks on their “sisters”… “this sister was hurt … her hijab was ‘ripped’ off.”

Remember folks that that there is nothing to see here, and that this is absolutely nothing to do with the call for jihad, and the Islamic State is nothing to do with Islam.  –thanks to the Q-Society

Islamic State recruiter Neil Prakash calls for attacks in Australia in propaganda video
Australia’s most senior Islamic State recruiter in Syria has urged young Muslim men to launch attacks on home soil in a new alarming propaganda video.–THEAGE.COM.AU
The Wally’s are still among us

A disturbingly high number:

AHEAD of the huge Anzac Day pilgrimage of about 10,500 Australians to Turkey, the Federal Government has revealed Queenslanders have been among 249 suspected jihadists prevented from leaving the country since August

Which means they are still here, and potentially a danger to us.–Andrew Bolt

12 thoughts on “Australian Responsibilities”

  1. Police fear travel bans on IS followers could see them switch their focus to local attacks

    No shiite Sherlock.

    Gosh, the people that rule over us, and decide our future, are real bright sparks. In just 14 years after 9/11, and just a few Islamic terrorst outrages, they’ve figured out stuff, that would have taken an Einstein several decades.

  2. Is it responsible for our government to prevent ISIS followers from leaving Australia?

    No.

    Which means they are still here, and potentially a danger to us.

    Correct.

    Now the question arises why doesnt the government let these people go. Then everyone is happy.

    But what if the purpose of the West is to keep them in the West, so that out of frustration, they do attack us.

    Keep in mind, that its not just Australia, but the entire Western strategy is to keep the Jihadis here.

    If that is the case, then I posit that if there is a really serious 9/11 type of Jihadi attack, followed by a serious law and order crisis, it will give the West the necessary excuse/reason to do whatever it wants.

    I think that the problems Muslims are causing in the West, requires a response to remove that problem. The West can only do so, if it has the necessary reason.

    As I’ve argued before, the continuous destabilisation of the Islamic world by the West has a reason. Its going to go for atleast another 40 years, with an outcome that we have been to;ld nothing about.

  3. .. . . The West can only do so, if it has the necessary reason.
    not really !!!!!
    any one who has read even just the appropriate parts of the three “religous” texts of islam KNOWS the goal of islam !

    The west does not NEED any excuse or reason to remove all the Vile Purtid Malevolent Deceitful islam from Western Secular Societies !!!

    The ONLY cause/reason islams remain in Australia (any secular country) is very simple and extremely easy to rectify !!!

    REMOVE (by the best means available) all islam Appeasing
    1. Politicians
    2. Politicals
    3. Local Government Councillors …. AND
    4. The PC (Cultural Marxist) Mind Controlled Self Destructs

    Then the islam will very quickly – dissappear – or be dissappeared !!!

  4. I agree with John Daniel – but this can only happen when the communitiy becomes sufficiently informed – so this is why groups like the Q society and this blog are so important. We should also be rediculing the idiots that verbally attack those who criticise islam and muslims – for example the dumb bimbo who posted a film of a woman who was extremely critical of two muslim ratbags in ordr to force some form of criminal conviction. When a brain dead PC inundated twit has control over what we can say then we have lost a great deal.

  5. Thanks John for the reply..

    I agree John. There is hardly any doubt that Islam makes shiite look good. Shiite only smells bad,but Islam is shiite to the core, its shiite morally and ethically.

    We agree on all that.

    So the question is, why are all Western countries, for the last 14 years, stating that Islam is the RoP, and the now addendum that “it has nothing to do with Islam”. In the meantime invading and destablising Muslim countries, which is contrary to the stated position that Islam ids RoP. This continuous global destabilisation of Muslim countries, looks very much like a Crusade, giving rise to millions of Muslims seeking asylum in the West?

    Why are even the statements of “RoP and nothing to do with” etc, exactly the same from all Wesrern leaders? This can only mean that this is a co-ordinated and agreed policy position for public consumption.

    Now such a huge strategic policy position, cannot be made on the fly at a leaders summit. Such a policy, which has been ongoing for the last 8 years at least, even before the election of Obama, must have been thrashed thought out in the in halls of Washington, London and the main NATO countries.

    Nothing much has changed in the last eight years, in strategic policy gtowards the ME countries, and nothing will for a long time to come, unless Islam collapses.

    I dont believe that all our leaders are fools. Heck, Tony Blair is a cunning so and so, but no one can accuse him of being a fool. In any case, long term major strategic policies are made at lower levels of government, and a number of policy options handed to politicians. I dont believe for a moment that strategic policy makers are idiots or ignorant. Many of them are as are wise to Islam as Sheikh.

  6. KAW write

    REMOVE (by the best means available) all islam Appeasing
    1. Politicians
    2. Politicals
    3. Local Government Councillors …. AND
    4. The PC (Cultural Marxist) Mind Controlled Self Destructs

    Then the islam will very quickly – dissappear – or be dissappeared !!!
    ————————————————————
    Thanks KAW for the response.

    Your four policy positions may or may not do the trick. But the fact is, that the public continuously vote for the Dems in the US, or Labour in the UK and Oz.

    So the public has to be educated. How?

    OK. I cannot ban Islam, as that would mean that in an open society, our culture had to resort to force and compulsion. Besides, the MSM, leftists and liberals will raise such a stink, and get into office, that they will prevent any such actions.

    1. Invade Muslim countries, and remove dictators from power, under the guise of bringing liberal democracy. This will open the door to sharia governments, civil war on many fronts, destruction of the economy, infrastructure, and the remove the threat of any Muslim gobvernment ever becoming a strategic threat.

    Such a policy has worked very well, until the Libyan affair,.
    Now the lMSM, Libs/leftys are accusing the US and UK of not thinking through the aftermath of removing dictators.

    The governments of the US/UK pretend that they did not know this would happen.

    Now you may say that I’m being wise after the event. Not really.

    2. The new disguised Crusade began to be apparent to Muslims in the ME and in the West, about 4 to 5 years ago. Cerytainly Gen Sisi woke up to it, and realised that the West couldnt care less if Morsi or Gaddaffi, was a friend or not. Sisdi was able to take action. Gaddafii was too late. Note how disappointed the US and UK were to the toppling of Morsi.

    PUBLIC EDUCATION.

    Now this is going to be contentious.

    Nothing excites the Muslim mind as a new Crusade by the “Christian” West. Muslim response in the ME, was to form ISIS. Muslims in the West, responded by rushing to join ISIS.

    The barbarous attacks on Christians and others, reveals to our own public the nature of Islam. Our own MSM is beginning to ask ,how is it that all the Western perks that we have made available to Muslims, including citizenship, was repayed by the halal type slaughter of Westerners?

    The MSM and even libs/leftys, are asking what is it about Islam. Read the comments, in major newspapers, when its is allowed. The vast majority of the public, even in the Guardian, dont buy that Islam is the RoP etc.
    —————————————————————
    Your four policy proposals will occur once the public is educated.

    1. I wrote: Nothing excites the Muslim mind as a new Crusade by the “Christian” West.

      Note that ISIS and all Muslims who believe, refer to Rome as the enemy they want to conquer. Rome is what they believe to be the centre of Christianity, their eternal enemy. Its not the great Satan(USA) or the little one ( Isreal), it is Rome. It is Rome that allah wants his followers to behead.

      This is whyWestern secular government interventions in Islamic countries, are viewed as Christian (Rome) Crusades.

      To sheikh, KAW, DON and others, this is well known, but this little bit is for other readers.

        1. Sheikh

          I dont think he does.

          The Jihad against Europe is not politival, but is a spiritual war.

          Let me expand.

          Islam does not consider Hinduism, Buddhism as clear and present enemies, as both the above, have been defeated and reduced to dhimmi status. In addition they pose no threat to Islam from the spiritual side.

          Christianity though is a clear and present danger to Islam. Muslims knows they are losing to evangelical Christianity, as many Muslims are converting to it. In addition, Islam was defeated in Europe, and has since been at the mercy of Christendom***.

          Muslim nations know they are the mercy of Christendom (see not below), in war, technology, and even food to survive, and devout Muslims resent it intensely.

          So what wecare seeing in the ME, with Christians beeing beheaded, with swords pointing to Rome, is the dying cry of a beast that is mortally wounded. (Note again, that in the middle ages, when Muslims were victorious in war , they did occasionally show compassion). Their barbarity is not a sign of strength but of weakness, and I’m sure some if not many Muslims can see it. Muslims always vote for the stronger horse (Seee Osama BL).

          As I said before, this is war is programmed for 50 years at the least, and may even last longer. But in the end, Islam will be gone, except in some pockets, and will survive as a relic, just as some cults do today.

          As for Muslims in the West, most will convert to Christianity. This means that churches will be once again full. We will not just havehome made scones, apple pies, etc after church, but Arab sweets and food too.

          Please pray for it.

          ***
          Note that even though all governments in the West are secular, this is not how Islam sees us. They are in a way right, as despite the secular nature of our nations, they live and breathe the culture of over 1500 years of Chrtistian faith that underpins our civilisation.

        2. Shekh wrote: Rome is the price.

          The belief is that if Muslims capture Rome, and turn it into a Islamic c ity, Christians, and the whole world, will realise that Islam is the true religion, and Christianity false.

          Islam will thus have the final victory, and the whole word will acknowledge it and become Muslim, or pay the Jizya.

          Hence the black flag of Islam over the White House, 10 Downing St, London, Paris etc.

          Delusional, yes. But one never knows the turns history will take. Thus it is best if all of us are aware.

          Thank you Sheikh, John, KAW for responding.
          Please criticise and point out any errors (apart spelling).

  7. West couldnt care less if Morsi or Gaddaffi

    Slould be:
    West couldnt care less if Mubarak or Gaddaffi

  8. The belief is that if Muslims capture Rome, and turn it into a Islamic c ity, Christians, and the whole world, will realise that Islam is the true religion, and Christianity false.

    Islam works on a very simple practical level. They believe that Rome is the centre of the Christian faith, and if Islam conquers it and makes it an Islamic city, it would mean that the God of Christianity is not the true God, as he would not allow Muslims , the followers of allah, to conquer it.

    So it will be that christians and others, will convert to Islam or pay the Jizya, as “allah is the greatest”.

    There is a corollary to this simple mindset.

    What if we conquer, occupy, and convert Mecca and Medina to a Christian cities. I think a majority of Muslims will convert to Christianity.

    Unfortunately, at the moment, Western public will never accept such a policy, and force us to withdraw, thus re-inforcing Islamic belief that “allah is the greatest”. But what if the Western public, in say 50 years or so, was so fed up with Islam, that they supported such a conquest.

    And what if our present continuous goading of the Islamic world using direct military interventions, or using third party proxies to destablise, use of drones all, over the ME, without UN sanction, were all designed for that purpose.

Comments are closed.