Baltimoron: Obama Children Needed “Space to Destroy”

CHAOS QUEEN: Baltimore Mayor Made Sure Cops Gave ‘Space For Those Who Wished To DESTROY’

10441522_991838884168744_96885153687009845_n

When social decay reaches a certain point, democracy is no longer a viable form of government. A case in point is Baltimore, which “black lives matter” moonbattery has plunged into chaos:

Baltimore mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake made a stunning admission Saturday in the aftermath of violent protests over the recent death of Freddie Gray, saying she wanted to give space to those “who wished to destroy.”

And destroy, some did. (Moonbattery)

The mayor of Baltimore, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, admitted in a press conference on the violent protestors in response to the death of Freddy Gray that they gave the protestors extra space in case they wanted to be destructive. Her comments are at around the 7:30 mark. Welcome to Obamastan.

10 thoughts on “Baltimoron: Obama Children Needed “Space to Destroy””

  1. She is the mayor of a major city in the USA?

    I’m beginning to think that women are unsuited to high office, where a great degree of toughness is required, as well a strategic insight.

    Margaret Thatcher was unique.

    1. Its not women, its more like the black race that is unable to fit into civil society. You see it all over the world. You see it also in the destructive attitudes of the Obamster, who will leave a horrible mess behind without ever taking responsibility. You saw it with the cocaine snorting mayor of Washington, Marion Barry, and you saw it with the “chocolate city” of New Orleans with the criminal mayor Ray Nagin. You see it with the thugs in the black caucus and in congress, where you find nothing but looters and moochers.

      1. I live in a majority black city and in a majority black neighborhood in that city. While I know several blacks who are fine people, what I see walking the streets of my neighborhood and hanging out at the nearby shopping centers and gas stations, they are truly lost. They seem to reject what I consider normal behavior, what I would be accused of as whitey behavior, and its not like they are forced to dress and act that way. They are the ones who chose to drop out of school and wear their pants below their ass. They choose to speak in a horrible English. They are given opportunities, more than I had, and they are not oppressed.

        1. Laurence Auster blamed the degradation of Black America on Liberalism.

          His argument was that Liberalism destroyed the Christian ethos of America. Blacks in America were the ones most affected by it.

          One could argue that Black Americans found it difficult to relate to White America and its culture (the cukture of dead White men, as Liberals put it), so they formed a strong community around the church. Christian faith not just restrained the violence that is inherent in man, but brought moral behaviour to the Black community. As the US constitution itself is rooted in Christianity, Black Americans found a way to Americam constitutional principles by way of Christian faith.

          The destruction of liberalism can be seen in the dysfunctional state of the Black American family. Black American youth have no strong and moral father figure, as the mother herself does not know who the father is. In any case, the father is likely to be no good, partly because his role as father has been taken over by the state. What we see is Black feral youthy, and even children.

          Allen West, Colin Powell are counter examples – from families that had strong Christian principles.

          Liberalism has destroyed much of the West, including America, and opened it up to a cauldron of evils, the main one being Islam. We have sometime to go before we hit rockbottom, and then start the recovery process.

  2. 715-Could not hear the question
    726-Answer starts
    738-m I instructed the police to allow the protesters their right to free speech
    800-we also gave those who wish to destroy space to do that as well!!!!!!!!!!

    Say what Captain-

    from control to pilot who has just told control tower that he is about to land in/on the Hudson River.

  3. Democrat platform, give them room for the necessary destruction.

    Democratic platform, disorder, destruction, chaos, death, rape. Sounds very much like Satan’s platform. Oh wait, who am I kidding, democrat part is the party of Satan.

  4. Once again, it is clear that the problem is not “race” or the degree of pigmentation of skin, but morality. If people are raised with Bible-based values, the society functions well, as a JudaeoChristian civilisation. Without those values, the society fails.

    America’s John Adams:

    “While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence. But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candour, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Oaths in this country are as yet universally considered as sacred obligations. That which you have taken, and so solemnly repeated on that venerable ground, is an ample pledge of your sincerity and devotion to your country and its government.”

    I say: The trouble with “democracy” is that the nation tends to get the government they deserve. If most voters are moral and wise, they will elect a good, wise, moral leader. If too many good people abstain from voting, considering it beneath their dignity to be involved in this “worldly” duty, the voters will mostly be immoral, lazy and stupid, and they will elect a demagogue and/or a crook. An autocracy, such as dictatorship or kingdom, can give the nation a leader who is either better or worse than the average citizen; it is NOT always a bad thing for the nation.

Comments are closed.