Meat of dead Jews, Christians and infidels should be eaten raw, not cooked or grilled…

Keep in mind that this comes from the same a$$holes who accused the crusaders of cannibalism:

Al-Azhar textbook: Eating dead Jews, Christians and infidels ‘halal’ if necessary
images-4
Religious jurisprudence textbooks for Al-Azhar students address, among other things, the issue of eating dead human beings, quoting Mansour bin Yunus al-Bahuti, a scholar of the Hanbali school of jurisprudence who died 500 years ago, as saying that eating dead Jews, Christians and non-believers is halal (permissible by Islam) if it is a necessity, but non-Muslims are not to eat dead Muslims, even out of necessity.
Another textbook quotes Imam al-Sherbini of the Shafi school of jurisprudence as saying that dead prophets of any religion should not be eaten. And when he was told that prophets do not die and that they lie alive praying in their graves according to the Hadith, he said that he meant if they were found dead before they were buried.
He also clarified that the meat of dead Jews, Christians and infidels should be eaten raw, not cooked or grilled.
Other Al-Azhar textbooks say that eating dead Jews, Christians and non-believers can be allowed not only out of necessity, but also as a punishment for heresy.
In the book “Persuasion in Resolving the Words of Abi Shoga” that takes after the Shafi school of jurisprudence, the author says a Muslim warrior may kill and eat infidel men, women and children if they were not warriors themselves.
But bin Abdel Salam recommends eating warrior adults and leaving warrior children for their economic value as slaves.
The chapter about food in the Hanbali book “Al-Rawd Al-Moraba Fi Sharh Zad Al-Mustaqni” for the secondary Al-Azhar schools says the Prophet allowed the eating of a hyena and a horse, which the Hanafi and Maliki schools of jurisprudence disagreed with.
The author also allowed the eating of peacocks, parrots, crows, locusts and water creatures, except frogs, crocodiles and eels. Whales may be eaten, he said, except their liver and their spleen. He also forbade the eating or grilling of live fish.
In the chapter about what is permissible to eat, the book “Al-Sharh al Saghir” for Ahmed Dardir, which explains the Maliki school of jurisprudence, says it is not permissible to eat wild game hunted by a Muslim and an infidel together, or anything slaughtered by a Christian or a Jew.
The book permits eating a giraffe and forbids eating pork. It says a Muslim may eat a dead human being out of necessity, but not eat pork or wild game that was hunted by a non-believer.
Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm
More of this:
“…you may kill an enemy fighter or an adulterer and eat his body”

2 thoughts on “Meat of dead Jews, Christians and infidels should be eaten raw, not cooked or grilled…”

  1. ” … it is not permissible to eat wild game hunted by a Muslim and an infidel together, or anything slaughtered by a Christian or a Jew.”

    This is in contradiction of the Qur’an. Chapter 5 says that muslims may eat our foods, including animals slaughtered by a Jew or a Christian. Maududi’s Tafsir goes on to explain this in more detail.

    http://www.quranbrowser.com/

    Try 5:5. You can compare several English interpretations of the meaning of the Qur’an, to get a sense of the significance of verses of the Qur’an.

    Example: Yusuf Ali renders it as:
    “This day are (all) things good and pure made lawful unto you. The food of the People of the Book is lawful unto you and yours is lawful unto them. (Lawful unto you in marriage) are (not only) chaste women who are believers, but chaste women among the People of the Book, revealed before your time, – when ye give them their due dowers, and desire chastity, not lewdness, nor secret intrigues if any one rejects faith, fruitless is his work, and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (all spiritual good). ”

    Maududi’s Tafsir: http://englishtafsir.com/
    [5] All the good and pure things have today been made lawful for you; the food of the people of the Book is lawful for you, and your food for them,21 Likewise you are permitted to marry chaste believing women or chaste women from among the people who were given the Scripture before you22 provided that you give them their dowries and become their protectors in wedlock; this permission is not for sensual license or secret illicit relations; whoever rejects the way of Faith, all the deeds of his life shall become vain and he shall be a bankrupt in the Hereafter.23

    Footnote 21 says:
    “The food of the People of the Book” also includes what has been slaughtered by them.

    “The food of the People of the Book is lawful for you and your food for them” means that there are no restrictions either on us or on them to take food together. The Muslims are permitted to take meals with the People of the Book and they with the Muslims. But the repetition of the sentence “all good and pure things have been made lawful for you” is very significant. It shows that the Muslims should not partake of their food, if the people of the Book do not observe those rules which are essential from the point of view of the Islamic Law, or if they include unlawful things in their food and drink. For instance, if they do not mention the name of Allah over the animal they slaughter or mention any other name than that of Allah over it, the flesh would be forbidden for the Muslims. Likewise if liquor or pork or any other forbidden things is served, the Muslims are not permitted to sit at the same table with them.

    The same rule also applies to the food and drink of other non-Muslims except that the Muslims are not permitted at all to eat the flesh of the animals slaughtered by non-Muslims. They are permitted to eat the flesh of the clean animals, slaughtered by the People of the Book only, if they duly pronounced the name of Allah over it.”

    There is more.

    It is worth reading the Qur’an and Maududi’s books. Some are easy to find online, to read or save.

  2. Now we know why ISIS kills. For food. And they “halal” it so
    that it conforms with Sharia law.

    Sex is readily available in Islam, food is not. Witness the crowds invading the shores of Europe. Bet 90 percent of them are from Islamic. Or the Somali refugee camps in Kenya, which
    Kenyans want to remove from their soil because of the Jihad that they bring along.

Comments are closed.