Oz Mustards worried anti-terror laws could prevent teaching from Koran

Comedy Gold!
Lydia Shelly of the Muslim Legal Network with Ertunc Yasar Ozen and Moustafa Kheir at Parliament. Photo: Andrew Meares
Muslims warn anti-terror laws could prevent teaching from Koran

swastika-koran

A Muslim cleric who preaches from certain passages of the Koran could be caught in the “broad” net of the government’s new anti-terror law, Islamic leaders have warned.
.

Grand Mufti of Australia Ibrahim Abu Mohammad and the Australian National Imams Council have called for the offence of “advocating terrorism” to be removed from the so-called Foreign Fighters Bill, currently before Parliament.

They went public with their opposition on the same day Prime Minister Tony Abbott backed the draft legislation as essential to reining in “preachers of hate”, including the radical Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Quelle Surprise!
Islamic preacher Junaid Thorne backs Melbourne terror raid suspects
An Australian self-styled Islamic preacher, with links to Islamic State fighters, has voiced support for five young men arrested over an alleged plot to kill police …  (The Australian)

The organisation is hosting a lecture in Lakemba on Friday to denounce “the politics and plots of the American-led intervention in Iraq and Syria” and Mr Abbott has conceded that the current legal framework is not sufficient to shut the event down. The imams council said a cleric could fall foul of the new law even if he simply “advocated the duty of a Muslim to defend his land”.

The world and everything in it belongs to allah and his profit. That includes all land, even land that is not yet conquered by Islam. Therefore, if Muselmaniacs wage jihad to drive Christians or Jews, Hindus or Buddhists out of their homes they are simply “defending their land”.(SY)

“We are therefore concerned that the proposal has serious implications on free speech and will have a chilling effect on legitimate religious and political debate,” the council – representing 250 imams – said in a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security.

Free speech for me but not for thee, the old Islamic supremacy is coming through, again.

Appearing in front of the committee on Wednesday, members of the Muslim Legal Network said the laws, introduced by Attorney-General George Brandis, should target the extreme fringe, not mainstream Muslims.

But all Muslims share the same goals, so they must apply to all.

They said any religious community could face being charged with a terror-related offence “if they refer back to stories in the Quran, Bible and Torah in their sermons”.

No matter how often a Christian or a Jew reads Bible or Torah, he will not start beheading people in the name of his god.

It is documented the al-Qaeda handlers of the 9/11 suicide pilots had urged them to dwell on passages in the Koran in which God promises to “cast terror into the hearts of those who are bent on denying the truth; strike, then, their necks!”

But some scholars have pointed out that the Old Testament is just as violent in its imagery, including Psalm 137 which threatens Babylonians that “blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rocks”.

Rubbish. The Christians follow Jesus. in the New Testament, and the Jew’s don’t base their actions on tales in the OT.

In its submission, the Islamic Council of Victoria said the new law would incriminate Muslims who support “legitimate forms of armed struggle”, including resistance to the Assad regime in Syria and the Palestinian conflict with Israel.

“The broad definition of ‘terrorism’ and the way in which it is sometimes selectively applied to such groups is problematic … [and] the power of the Attorney-General to list terrorist organisations without oversight and consistency exacerbates this problem,” it said.

“Broadening this definition to include ‘foreign incursions’ and ‘treason’ when Australia already has laws which deal with these further muddies the water on the issue of what can be considered terrorism and what should be considered legitimate resistance to oppression.

“Criminalising the act of ‘advocating terrorism’ adds another layer of complexity to this issue. The scope of what constitutes ‘advocating terrorism’ is unclear.”

It starts with Muhammad who said “terror made me victorious”- and “strike terror in the hearts of the enemy”, among other things.

The council identified what it says is a double standard in Muslims wanting to go to Syria and Iraq to provide aid having their passports cancelled “while ignoring the travel of Zionist Jews wishing to travel to Israel – a state which illegally occupies Palestinian territory with intention of fighting in a war against Gazans and has been accused of war crimes”.

BS on steroids. Jews have every right in the world to defend Israel against Mohammedan aggression. Koranimals who invoke ‘allah’ and wage jihad to make the world Islamic are psychokillers who need to meet their virgins, asap.

8 thoughts on “Oz Mustards worried anti-terror laws could prevent teaching from Koran”

  1. Korans should be burnt and dirty mosque bull dozed

    Oh the irony a hate filled book used for peaching hate banned now thats a great idea

  2. The Queeran should be labeled hate material and banned.

    Really simple to see what that so called Religious document contains. A manifesto for world dominance, DUH.

  3. Love your red comments.

    Told your before .

    Keep it up.

    Education is the key to tackle jihad and Islamism.

    1. Daniel Diamond,

      “Education is the key to tackle jihad and Islamism”

      True, But you know what else seems to work tout suit?

      Having the misfortune of living near muslim colonizers. Suddenly, even the most Liberal and (wink) tolerant become NIMBYS.

      The change from Liberal Apologist, do gooder to angry ranter is fun to watch.

  4. Muslims warn anti-terror laws could prevent teaching from Koran

    http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chi1.htm

    1. The petitioners are the citizens of India and are engaged in various types of social work.

    2. The Government has a public duty to forfeit every copy of a book, which
    incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.

    3. The Koran, also spelt as Quran, the so-called religious Book of the Muslims the world over,

    4 The Book has verses which preached cruelty, incited violence and disturbed public tranquility

    5 The Book promotes religious enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities in India.

    6 The Book insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.

    7 While the Koran abounds with saying which incite violence, insult the religious beliefs of other communities and even exhort the Muslims to kill and murder non-Muslims, the problem is aggravated by yet another fact which has been true in the past and is universally true in our own times that unlike other communities Muslims are, and even fresh converts tend to become, highly orthodox people and follow the sayings of the Book with a fanatical zeal with the result that whichever country has their sizable number amongst its population can never have peace on its soil.

    What, about hate?

    And about the other things like inciting violence, insulting other religions, promoting religious enmity, disturbing public tranquility, promoting on ground of religion feelings of enmity- ( see below)

    The real issue raised by the Petition was not what Muslims believe about the Quran but what behaviour patterns the Quran inculcates in its votaries vis-à-vis the unbelievers.

    http://sultanknish.blogspot.com.au/2009/05/can-we-ban-islam-legal-guidelines-for.html

    Wilders’ demand for consistency, recalls the Calcutta Quran Petition of the 1980s.
    Like his Hindu predecessors, Wilders was fed up with Muslim abuse of similar Indian laws, and simply saying if one bans hate speech, in accord with existing Dutch Law, then the Koran is hate speech.

    The Calcutta Quran Petition chronicled how it was the abuse of hate speech laws by Muslims seeking to impose Sharia mandates on non-Muslim majorities that was the source of the problem.

  5. The Koran! A book of fiction that inspires the bizarre teachings of some dead murdering desert dwelling paedophile!

Comments are closed.