What? The Freedom Sack Is Compulsory?

Here in the West the Islamoprops keep telling us that the Freedom Sack is voluntary, that they do it for god  Allah or just to rub it in. But in Iran they have had it since 1979, and the women don’t like it at all.
https://www.facebook.com/StealthyFreedom/photos/a.859102224103873.1073741828.858832800797482/1121398024540957/?type=1&theater

A user's photo.

متن فارسی را در انتهای متن انگلیسی بخوانید و شما هم نظرتان را برای وزیر امور خارجه استرالیا که چهارشنبه همین هفته به ایران می رود بنویسی      We the Iranian

See More

Text English read the English text at the bottom and you have your opinion for the Secretary of State this week to Iran Wednesday Australia goes here

We the Iranian women call on Australian foreign Minister Julie Bishop to challenge the compulsory hijab when visiting Ir.

Ms Bishop’s visit to Tehran on Wednesday.

“This is the time for her to ask the Iranian government about the compulsory hijab and human dignity.”

There are a lot of women in Iran who are going to be following her when she talks about this. This is an opportunity for us. We have been waiting for it,”

Ms Alinejad said foreign officials often take the line they don’t want to interfere with domestic politics. Just last year the security forces issued warnings to 3.6 million women about their non-proper hijab. Eighteen thousand women were arrested and sent to the courts. So the hijab is a “human rights” issue which needs to be addressed.

Australia’s Foreign Minister goes to Iran Wednesday and reportedly one of the most Australian media audience of women on this page that is to say in a meeting with Iranian officials about the law تبغیض-violent protest against the veil now because more than three million Iranian women just in the past year, and get a hint for eighteen thousand women for the sake of the veil in the judiciary was formed in. ..You can either make your letter addressed to the Secretary of State to visit Australia and to Iranian authorities that women not a politician to write process:

Text of interview with Australian media page Admin
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/masih-alinejad-calls-on-julie-bishop-not-to-wear-hijab-when-visiting-iran/story-fnq2o7dd-1227279725258

#آزادی‌یواشکی
#mystealthyfreedom

4 thoughts on “What? The Freedom Sack Is Compulsory?”

  1. Why aren’t ‘progressive’ muslims with a public profile who are purportedly concerned with muslim rights taking up this issue in support of Iranian (and other muslim) women?

    People like Keysar Tra, Waleed Aly etc etc.

  2. Why not just consult the Qur’an?

    HERE ARE THE FACTS ABOUT WOMEN COVERING UP IN ISLAM, ACCORDING TO THE QUR’AN, AHADITHS, AND SHARIA LAW ITSELF:

    Here’s everything you never really wanted to know about female head-coverings (hijabs, niqaba, and burkas) as officially defined by only the most “sahih” (official) doctrines of islamic sharia jurisprudence. Read it and laugh.

    Or cry.

    The Hijab (or Niqab, as in this specific case) is not a religious duty or fashion trend, it’s only a prison uniform!

    It’s also a victim-blaming insult to both sexes; from Qur’an Sura 33:59, it is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad himself allegedly was) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it’s always the women’s own fault for not covering up.

    It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!

    “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’ân 33:59)

    So, exactly HOW will they “be known,” in the freedom sack?!

    Certainly not as in: “Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!” – but “known” as muslimas – as members of the gang!

    And why is this important? “So as not to be molested!”

    Which again implies that muslims DID and always WILL “molest” (i.e: rape,) all the NON-muslim (“infidel”) women!

    That it’s the infidel women’s faults, because they don’t cover up, that the muslim men “must” molest (rape) them!

    And the Qur’an itself confirms their holy right and duty to rape infidel women.

    Muhammad also said women are created by allah as domesticated animals, created for men’s pleasure, and like fields to be tilled at will by men.

    So islam is also the “Religion of Rape!”

    ;-(

    Before Muhammad, covering up was optional; any fool could ignore it if they wanted to.

    The tafsir ahadith isnads (supplemental, explanatory material appending the Qur’an) explain that the Sura in question (33:59) arose because Moe’s wives were seen by moonlight as they went potty outside his tent one night.

    But, quite unlike any other self-respecting warlord, who would have had the peeping tom executed for spying on his wives, Moe agreed with the man and blamed his victims, (his own wives) perhaps because the peeper was a rich or influential member of an allied tribe.

  3. Thanks, Uncle Vladdi.

    You are using a common translation which is preferred by Muslims in the West, because it is not quite as explicit as this one from the Saudi “Noble Koran:”

    Quran – 33:59 Allah says: O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies (tanslated to close) – i.e. screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye to see the way). That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed.

    And Allah is Ever of Forgiving, Most Merciful.

Comments are closed.