Tony BLiar gets himself a job “fighting anti-Semitism”

Double-talk. This is an EU-OIC ploy using anti-Semitism to go after Islam critics:

Tony Blair to head the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation to tackle anti-Semitism
291D879E00000578-0-image-m-4_1433379275303According to The Times, The ECTR’s model law includes a new crime of group libel, defined as “defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group. . .with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges”. ...

More slandering and ridiculing by Joe Millis at International Business Times thanks to Mullah, pbuh

 “The legislation includes giving greater power to judiciaries to prosecute hate speech, lowering the barriers to what constitutes incitement to violence, making Holocaust denial illegal, entrenching state funding for religious institutions into law, creating clearer definitions of what is racist and antisemitic, and securing educational programmes about tolerance in national legislation.” …

More clearer definitions of what is racist at The Guardian

To hell with that bastard.

  • Tony Blair is to take up role dedicated to fighting racism and anti-Semitism
  • He will be chairman of European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation
  • The organisation encourages countries to fight racism and xenophobia

More fighting fear of Xenon at Mail Online

3 thoughts on “Tony BLiar gets himself a job “fighting anti-Semitism””

  1. The mongrel Tony Blair belongs in prison for war crimes, about time all these politicians were locked up for treason.

    Sick to friggin death of it all. Just had it up to here.

  2. That treasonous cunt belongs in prison. The British government has know all about islam since at least the 1791 publishing of The Hedaya (their most official sharia law manual) which had been translated into English for the British Raj by Charles Hamilton.

  3. Re: ““defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group. . .with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges”. …” and ““The legislation includes giving greater power to judiciaries to prosecute hate speech, lowering the barriers to what constitutes incitement to violence, ” etc…

    NOTICE HOW GROUPS, BUT NOT PEOPLE, GET TO HAVE RIGHTS BUT NO CONCOMITANT COROLLARY RESPONSIBILITIES?

    Pam Geller was recently asked

    “Is there anything which ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?”

    NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.

    Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed, that’s just the packaging, but because it’s fraudulent slander.

    Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!

    Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats… and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

Comments are closed.