Motoon expo in Londonistan makes Mustards and Guardianistas spin wild tales

“Far-right Gates of Vienna website” is also promoting upcoming London exhibition of Muhammad cartoons which it is feared is intended to incite Islamist violence

Wow. That’s a mouth full.  Not Mohammedan assassins cause the problem, “it is feared” that cartoonists make them do it, otherwise the soldiers of allah would be peaceful. Practice self censorship, infidels, then we don’t have to slaughter you now, we will kill you later in your sleep. (SY)

Imran Hussain
 Imran Hussain, one of six Labour MPs calling for action to be taken ‘if anyone involved [in the website] is deemed to be promoting terrorism and civil disorder’. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

A group of MPs have called for an investigation into a far-right website described as a training manual for anti-Muslim paramilitaries – amid fears that an upcoming exhibition of cartoons of the prophet Muhammad in London is designed to incite Islamist violence.

The Gates of Vienna website has been heavily promoting the exhibition, which is understood to feature the same drawings shown in Texas in May when two gunmen attempted to storm the event and were killed by police.

It has been organised by the former Ukip parliamentary candidate Anne-Marie Waters and is set to take place at a location in central London on 18 September with tickets priced at £35. Organisers say among those attending will be Geert Wilders, the Dutch rightwing politician who has espoused controversial views on Islam.

In a report on the so-called British counter-jihadist movement, published on Monday, the anti-fascist group Hope Not Hate called for the exhibition to be banned.

Nick Lowles, Hope Not Hate’s chief executive, said: “Our concern is that the event is intended to provoke a reaction from British Muslims. It is not about freedom of speech, it is about incitement. The authorities cannot allow this event to go ahead. Communities shouldn’t rise to their bait, we must stand together as a show of strength.”

Lowles also said he had serious concerns about material published on the Gates of Vienna website. The site – the name of which refers to a 1683 battle between European forces and the Ottoman empire – contains detailed descriptions of how anti-Muslim paramilitary groups could operate during a conflict with European Muslims.

One entry is a fictionalised account of a predicted race war, described as “a hard look at the near future in Britain”, with a section entitled “A guide to amateur bomb-making”. Waters is a contributor to the site and has written a lengthy post about the London exhibition.

Lowles said he believed the site was hosted on British servers. “If a Muslim had a similar website, which includes bomb manuals and details about assassinations and establishing paramilitary groups, then you can be sure action would be taken,” he added.

The Labour MPs Ian Austin, Ruth Smeeth, Imran Hussain, Paula Sherriff, Wes Streeting and John Cryer have written to the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, asking her to consider if the site’s owners are breaching the law.

The letter reads: “It is clear that these are the ideas that inspired Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik and as such it is deeply troubling that they are available to inspire others. We would urge you to investigate the Gates of Vienna website and take appropriate action if anyone involved is deemed to be promoting terrorism and civil disorder.”

Austin told the Guardian he would also be raising the issue with Theresa May. “I am shocked that the Gates of Vienna website can publish articles promoting a strategy for civil war,” he said. “At a time when we should all be concerned about terrorism it is imperative that the police investigate this website and those behind the calls for civil war and I’ll be raising this with the home secretary.”

He added that the exhibition of Muhammad cartoons was “clearly [intended] to provoke a reaction from British Muslims and we must all ensure this does not happen”.

Wilders was also present at the exhibition of the cartoons in Texas, which was run by the anti-Islam American Freedom Defense Initiative and hosted by the group’s co-founder, Pamela Geller, a US blogger and speaker who is banned from entering the UK over her anti-Muslim views.

Vive Charlie, an online magazine set up after the attacks by Islamist extremists on the offices of the satirical publication Charlie Hebdo in Paris, is co-hosting the exhibition along with Waters’ website Sharia Watch and the fringe far-right party Liberty GB. The magazine, which has no connection to the French title, is calling for artwork submissions.

Waters said in a statement on Sharia Watch: “It is vital, in this era of censorship and fear, that we stand together in defiance and demand our right to free expression … We will not, and cannot, succumb to violent threats. The outlook for our democracy depends on the actions we take today.”

A spokesman for the Metropolitan police said an appropriate policing plan would be put in place for the event but would not comment further.

32 thoughts on “Motoon expo in Londonistan makes Mustards and Guardianistas spin wild tales”

  1. “In a report on the so-called British counter-jihadist movement, published on Monday, the anti-fascist group Hope Not Hate called for the exhibition to be banned.”

    If any thing needs to be banned than it needs to be the Koran.

    It is the only way to remove Hate and Increase Hope-yes that is Hope Not Hate.

    http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chi1.htm
    1. The petitioners are the citizens of India and are engaged in various types of social work.
    2. The Government has a public duty to forfeit every copy of a book, which
    incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
    3. The Koran, also spelt as Quran, the so-called religious Book of the Muslims the world over,
    4 The Book has verses which preached cruelty, incited violence and disturbed public tranquility
    5 The Book promotes religious enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities in India.
    6 The Book insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
    ….

  2. It is noticeable that the Guardian has disbled teh comments section for this article.

    It has been evident for at;east a year that even Guardian readers have become hard line Right wing Islamophobes.

    1. Yes, you are seeing comments disabled a lot more. BBC, Guardian, many media sites in the US. They really don’t like the public to comment because it proves the public is over Islam and not buying the baloney being peddled by the MSM.

      1. Then we need to increase the lobbying efforts on our politicians. The corrupt editors we can jail later, but we need to win our countires back first.

        1. http://sheikyermami.com/2014/08/headchoppers-fear-backlash-and-behead-a-few-more/#comment-8339

          http://sheikyermami.com/2015/05/muslims-are-australian-citizens-they-have-a-right-to-look-at-changing-the-system/#comment-91199

          http://sheikyermami.com/2015/07/useful-idiot-watch-4/#comment-100178

          http://sheikyermami.com/2014/03/we-need-a-cull-of-nasa-funded-mathematicians/#comment-5395

          kaw … (the great NOT understanding)
          You keep posting the same comment …
          and expect …
          what ???

          Oh! …
          you expect the islam Appeasing “Authorities” to just stop islam Appeasing !
          and the islams to stop islaming !
          Why ???

          because …
          islam Appeasers and islams …
          are a sympiotic Repugnant relationship !!!

  3. Re: “The Labour MPs Ian Austin, Ruth Smeeth, Imran Hussain, Paula Sherriff, Wes Streeting and John Cryer have written to the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, asking her to consider if the site’s owners are breaching the law.”

    There’s where you should start.

  4. Somebody may make you angry. They may make you so angry that you would like to do them bodily harm. But when you actually commit violence against them, that is your decision and your responsibility. And the consequences should be on you.

    1. Muslims are taught a very different way of thinking. We are taught to develop self-control, for example. They are not. We admire people with an “internal locus of control”, while Islam encourages an “external locus of control”. Read articles by psychologist Nicolai Sennels eg:

      http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/63122/sec_id/63122

      Muslims and Westerners: The Psychological Differences
      by Nicolai Sennels (May 2010)

    2. Not protecting yourself against …
      THE KNOW Vile Putrid Malevolent Deceitful islam THREAT !
      Well … it IS tantamount to suicide !!

      it is not a crime to protect yourself against repugnant islam !
      it is a crime to NOT protect yourself against repugnant islam !

    1. Their government has made no open statement on this issue to my knowledge, but the law enforcement people have hinted that illegal entry points into the USA from Mexico are utilized by islamists. This does not imply that the islamists have an arrangement with Mexico, rather that a conduit seems to exist and that it should be shut down if it exists. However, Iran does have consderable influence south of Mexico and one should be concerned about the growing importance of iran in this region – it does not bode well!

      1. @kaw,

        I know someone, who is in the military that trains with the border control.

        He says, they are already in the US and in the wind.

  5. .Just so that the rest understand what mr daniel cannot wrap his thick skull around… – rather than continually post here you need to make your concerns known to those you voted into power – why do you think the muslims are getting their concessions – because they make sure that they are heard and most of you with very valid concerns about islam are keeping quiet. If you want democracy to work for you you have to be involved … you CANNOT sit on the sidelines. If we wait for too long then we will not be able to speak! Many here claim that politicans are actively helping muslims however the truth is that muslims are making a far louder noise than you are – so how should (or can) the politician hear your concerns??? BTW Mr. Daniel – I do not know what authority you claim but, apart from appearing like a rank red neck, you have said precisely nothing that those who are informed do not know. You want to pick a fight – fine – you will not be left standing – but I would rather that you worked towards the common goal we seek rather than behaving like a moronic twit. Another point to people reading this blog – we are in a war not of our making – those that seek to sow the seeds of dischord amongst this group who share very real and justifiable concerns about islam need to be considered with a great deal of suspicion!

    Incidentally John Dill – if you cannot understand or comprehend a comment then ask for an explantion – do not bother making a comment until you understand what was intended.

    1. @kaw,

      RE: “Another point to people reading this blog – we are in a war not of our making .”

      -True. We are at war, but you and people like us, who come to this site, and others, like Bare naked Islam, Gates of Vienna and Moonbattery.

      We, my friend, we are the prescient…the Kassandra’s, who speak the truth that no one wants to hear or know.

      We know…we know what is coming. It is the winds of war. With each wave of invaders that wind grows stronger and gains momentum. In the last 5-10 years, they (invaders) grow bigger, bolder and more aggressive? My God, who would ever have thought that in the year 2015, that Britain would be assaulted by an invasion attempt by over 2,000 people? What ever lies and denials the media and the modernist want to call it, The attempt to use the channel tunnel as an entry way into Britain; was an invasion. Expect more attempts to come, 70 years ago, when it was the Huns, without hesitation, the British military would be there to counter such an attack. Now we are stifled by niceties and weakness and don’t want to seen to be harming those who would harm us.

      Eventually, it will spill over where the invaders actions can’t be excused or spun by the media and government, that these acts are the actions of an a select few aberrations, like the murders of 7/7, 9/11, Lee Rigby and Kriss Donald. They are brigands, the advance war party.

      To our shame, and arrogance, many within our modern society are so caught up with their own sense of modernity, they smugly believe that they are above such violence, that words and negotiations will stop the invasion or the violence. Or worse, their arrogance in the manner in which they think that IF we only issue acts of charity or help with jobs in their own country it will stop. Or even worse, if the modernist show just how cool they are -hip to diversity, it will all be good.

      Fools that they are, these modernist, live in a post modern world and think the rest of the world lives that way too. They are lulled into believing their own sanctimony, that just because they are open and accepting of others. That the other will be open and accepting of them. This makes the modernist dangerous. Dangerous to themselves -which I don’t care what happens to them, but when their naivety affects us (me and mine), they become dangerous for the rest of us.

      Lastly, IMHO neither your civilized attempt to reach out to our political class or john Daniel’s aggressive pathway matters in the NOW. (please note: Kaw and jD, these are not criticisms, but observations.) Because, as outliers, no body cares. Nobody really gives a fuck until they become a NIMBY. This truth has been proven and reiterated time and time again, in the a fore mentioned events and murders cited above, or in the rape and deliberate violence towards a thousand defenseless young girls in one country alone. If a thousand acts of violence will not wake one up to the wickedness that is Islam, then that means the threshold for the ugly awakening has to be much much higher. Until that happens, all of us here and on other sites, offline and in the real world, where the truth is just far too unnerving and ugly, in this bizarro world, the truth tellers have become the baddies.

      And we will continue to be labeled so, until the tide turns.

      -Hill

      1. I agree with you Hill to a considerable extent however there are many ways to fight a war. We are trying to change the direction of a train which already has consiserable intertia. We can only do this by using an intelligent approach – john daniel for example does not seem to realize this and the last thing we can afford is a direct conflict with the “elite”. We need to change the direction of the train, but we are not in a position to do this with violence. We need to exploit every weakness than we can deduce and the most obvious of this is the loss of electoral office. Muslims lobby intensively (most of the money the Saudi scum put into the US goes to buying people of) and this is what we need to do. CAIR is principally a mechanism that muslims use to lobby the elected representatives to make decisions than benefit muslims – CAIR is effectively a weapon in the muslim arsenal and our silence allows this weapon to operate efficiently. The best way we can fight is at the grassroots level – and we also need people with experience in consitutional and criminal law on board. People do not realize that democracy, not perfect but probably the best system of governance that we have, only works when people are involved. Every muslim “victory” today has not been a victory in the standard sense, rather we have allowed the muslims to dictate on an issue – one example being the building of mosques in areaa where people did not want them. Here councils were allowed to override public concerns and a clear carrot/stick approach would have probably reversed the decision if the electorate really followed its concerns. If we want to reclaim our countries we have to take our fight to the enablers and make them realize that they have the most to loose – and this is usually a loss of political office or funding. We can take the muslms on and we will win, but we will have to do this time and time again until we remove the routes that they can use to enter our homelands. It is, in my opinion, better to attack this problem by removing support for the muslim cause from the people in public office. Understand this John Daniel – if we use violence now we will loose. The muslims and their left wing bed buddies understand this – this is why the left wing scum attack any public meeting where these issues are discussed – they are trying to provoke an incident that the media can report in their terms (and yes – the media has been bought and cannot be trusted). We can still fight this war but while violence is not necessary some clear stratgic and tactical thinking is! Okay the message here is serious but I cannot resist one little final dig – small print only in this message – no capitals apart from those required by rules of grammar – now why would that be JD?

        1. We can only do this by using an intelligent approach – john daniel for example does not seem to realize this and the last thing we can afford is a direct conflict with the “elite”.

          WHY …
          Oh Great and Powerful Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle

        2. and the Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle continues using its (low) definition of “intellectual” aggression !!!

        3. “… we need to resort to what we can use and control to great effect – our political system.

          But here in lies your lie
          it is not our political system
          it is your “elites” political system

          So what you suggest is impossible !

          Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle
          go and properly research !
          instead of spreading your insatiable need to feed your hubris along with meeting the demands of your masters !

    1. John,
      Your diatribes do all a disservice. You have really nothing to say – there is a problem – a real problem – and you are not capable of resolving it or even offering useful advice. I

    2. John,
      Your diatribes do all a disservice. Please learn to think before acting – it is more effective. Why can’t we invoke a direct conflict with the elite – because they are too powerful if we seek to deal with them in the way you seem to advocate. At present they hold most, but not all, of the cards. They can be beaten but we need to resort to what we can use and control to great effect – our political system. It has been used against us because most don’t participate in the political process! Don’t bother replying – it is your call – but do try and think a little more deeply about the problem that besets us. You may be an problematic individual but you are our problematic individual and we need all hands to pull together if we wish to keep the future safe for our kids. Of course muslims are working to change our legal systems for their benefit – they have done this in every country they have established themselves in – and if one wishes to acheive dominance it is a logical step. Islam conducts itself in a rigorous fashion which quite similar to a military campaign so these actions by muslims should have been expected! We have to stop them and we do this through the process of law. John, I know you will not listen but if you want to contribute to helping Australia resolve this issue you need to start working in another direction . All that you have written has been known for a long time – so why has appropriate action against these people not yet started. A difficult question to answer but, I suspect, the answer lies in peoples unwillingness to become involved. John, you might, if you are smart enough, start introducing your concerns into community meetings but you cannot do this in the way you write! Simply give examples of bad muslim behaviour – there are enough – and ask to community how they plan to protect citizens against the typical islamic outrage. Then take their responses, which will mimic responses made by other communities, and show them how these responses failed in other communities. Then ask them to how to reconsider their original proposals. Read up on Sweden and France – there are so many examples there. If you want to find a solution that is fair to all then you need to involve the greater community – anything else will fall short. Now do us a favor and think a little before letting of steam again. You have not realized this yet, but a solution without violence is far more permanent than one with violence. However, that we will have to resort to violence at some point seems most likely and if that happens then we cannot turn away. Now do some thinking instead of stewing.

      1. The islams have one !
        Take note of your own words …
        Now do us a favor and think a little before letting of steam again.

      2. YOUR diatribes do all a disservice …
        Your diatribes do all a disservice. Please learn to think before acting – it is more effective. Why can’t we invoke a direct conflict with the elite – because they are too powerful if we seek to deal with them in the way you seem to advocate. At present they hold most, but not all, of the cards.

        Please heed … your “opinions” … are your own “opinions”!
        NOT MINE !

        … and you really haven’t understood a thing !!!
        other than your own opinion !

      3. “… You may be an problematic individual but you are our problematic individual … ”

        Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle
        Your head is on backward and your ‘brain’ is in upside down
        … go and “play” with your islam friends !

  6. the “… civilized attempt to reach out to our political class …”
    (a (previous) time and effort waster (of mine) and obviously not practised by … but promoted by the “Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle)
    is a (very) futile attempt to “Play Chess” with the ones guilty of Treason Sedition and Subversion of our countries !
    (these “authorities” intend for NOT nice things to happen to their citizens)

    the “… aggressive pathway …”
    is the simple act of (the very much needed) Self-Defense !
    (and is NOT original initiated Aggression) !
    (the (islam appeasers AND) islams constantly tell us what they are intending)
    … it is a crime to NOT mitigate a known life threat AND NOT prepare for AND NOT defend oneself against a know and self proclaimed and observable enemy !!!
    (which is “The Crime” our “authorities” are guilty of …)!!!

    and …
    a thank you (conscious and observant) Hill …
    and also for … for using the lowercase-j !

  7. Actually I have understood every thing you have written – you just not comprehended the comments I wrote. I could amuse myself by continuing the conversation but there is no point – you do not have much to contribute to a meaningful debate on how we can remove islam from our shores. I seem to have failed in trying to point you in more profitable directions in which you can expend your energy to addressing the problem we ALL face together – so I hope that someone else has the patience to direct you in a useful direction. I don’t really have the time to waste,

    1. blah blah blah …
      (in your small opinion)
      bye … Failure …
      (you judged yourself as such … and you are)
      I wish you luck … etc (in your continued slave life) … !!!

      and … you do take what you deserve so badly
      Mentally Insane Lama – aleisle
      NB: you are the one who tagged yourself for what you are ….
      NEVER a venerated spiritual master !
      (which is what blinds you to a real reality)

      Your hubris far outshines my venerable worthless self !

      OK …
      enough with play time …
      time to go … back to work !
      bye bye ! kaw …
      (with the lowercase ‘k’ )
      self fornicator … just like the islams … and …
      The PC (Cultural Marxist) Mind Controlled Twats n Twits

      and …
      (Sheik … thanks for the playground) …
      and for your tolerant moderation !

  8. Yawn!!! John …. you are quite literally the looser of the month!! Congratulations! Now catch your brain cell before it escapes!!!

Comments are closed.