Let´s make it absolutely clear that what we fight against is terror, not islam

Did I say stupidity is the basic building block of the universe? I did.

Here, from the fever swamp of the United Nations on International terrorism:

Asset.aspxJan Hammacek, the president of the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic.

…this scourge has developed on an unprecedented scale. I am convinced we can effectively face it only by not repeating mistakes of the past. Therefore let´s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds, that what we fight against is terror, not islam.

That islamophobia is as abhorrent and dangerous as racism and antisemitism and is to be suppressed by all legal means. That we all perceive islam as a shining diamond in the crown of mankind, along with other religions, cultures and civilizations.

Thank you for your attention.

17 thoughts on “Let´s make it absolutely clear that what we fight against is terror, not islam”

  1. “That we all perceive islam as a shining diamond in the crown of mankind, along with other religions, cultures and civilizations.”

    Why do people go all flowery when it is related to Islam?

    And when flowery statements are made it is made by people who have very little knowledge of Islam.

    “shining diamond in the crown of mankind,”
    Really? Evidence any ? Based on Reality? Based on Current Events? Based on History?

    Why did Jan Hammacek not make a “neutral” statement?

    When did Judge Sweeney become an expert on Islam? ( see below)

    See how this judge made his flowery statement about Islam.

    Who was he impressing.?

    Was there a need to make this statement in his Judgment?

    How did Judgment Sweeney know that Adebolajo and Adebowale views were a “betrayal of Islam.”?

    Where is the evidence required in court for the Judge to say this?

    Where is elsewhere?

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/02/uk-judge-tells-jihad-murderers-of-soldier-that-they-betrayed-islam-they-start-screaming-allahu-akbar-and-fighting-prison-guards

    “He told them: “You each converted to Islam some years ago. Thereafter you were radicalised and each became an extremist, espousing views which, as has been said elsewhere, are a betrayal of Islam.””

  2. Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy. The intent is to scare us witless so as to render us incapable of mounting an effective defense.

    If Jan Hammacek, the president of the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic was an intelligent human instead of an analencephalopath, he would read page 60 of S.K. Malik’s “The Quranic Concept Of War” and get a God blessed clue.

    Jan: in what book, chapter and verse are these terms found: “I will cast terror”, “Allah cast terror”, “to strike terror”, “to terrify thereby” & “made victorious with terror”????? What do those texts define & exemplify??

    Politician and ShitHead are synonymous terms. 🙁

  3. If we did state that we were fighting Islam as a whole, we would lose all cooperation with all Muslim countries. This is quite unnecesary.

    The right strategy is to fight Islam by stating that we are only targetting radical islam – whatever that is.

    Now Musims know that there is no radical Islam. But they are now snookered, and unable to deny our narrative. We vcan mow go after islam proper but maintain a fiction. The only downside of this strategy is that we have to continue allowing Muslims to settle in the West.

    If we wish to name the enemy as Islam, then it requires that we not only stop Islamic immigration, but repatriate, deport and banish all Muslims, and ban Islam from the West. If we do not wish to go this way, then there is no point in naming Islam as the enemy, for it just makes enemies of all Muslims, while leaving them resident citizens in the West.

  4. “The only downside of this strategy is that we have to continue allowing Muslims to settle in the West.”

    Why do we even have to do that, though??
    Why can’t we just say – as the decal states so succinctly – ‘F@ck off – we’re full!’ ??

  5. DP111: Cowardly sniveling drivel!

    It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

    No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and we aren’t doing even any of these muslims (whose own ancestors were among Muhammad’s first victims) any favours by going along with any of their historic lies and alibi excuses for their crimes.

    Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

    1. Clues for the clueless:
      Surah At-Taubah 9.123 “fight those of the disbelievers nearest you” that is Shari’ah; Muslims must obey it.

      Moe attacked Jewish settlements surrounding Medina. At Khaybar Oasis, he burned their date palm plantation as a means of terrorizing them. He had Kab Ashraf assassinated to terrorize Jews in Medina. That is Sunnah, Muslims must emulate it.

      Let the few elected oficials intelligent and sane enough to get a clue read “Islam 101 For Politicians” to learn the damnable details.

  6. “That we all perceive islam as a shining diamond in the crown of mankind..”

    That really is one of the most insane, sickening and cowardly things a politician has ever said.

    “WE all perceive…”
    Really? Who the f$ck does this clown think he is???

  7. “Let’s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds, that what we fight against is terror, not islam. That islamophobia is as abhorrent and dangerous as racism and antisemitisim and is to be suppressed by all legal means. That we all perceive islam as a shining diamond in the crown of mankind, along with other religions, cultures and civilizations. ” — Jan Hammacek, the president of the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic.

    “we fight against is terror, not islam.”

    Who is WE?

    “we all perceive islam…..”

    Who is WE ALL?

    1. Daniel Diamond

      As you point out, it was Jan Hammacek, the president of the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic, who made a glorious non-discriminatory and laudable statement.

      In the meantime the Czeck republic has stated that it will not accept EU quotas. However it will accept just 1500 refugees over a three year period. I think there is also a condition of what sort of refugees. Their neighbourSlovakia will accept only a few hundred but they have to be Christian Syrians.

      With politicians one has to be careful. The more they shout they will be doing something, the less it is they are likely to do, and viceversa.

      1. “..“Let’s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds, that what we fight against is terror, not islam….”

        “it was Jan Hammacek, the president of the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic, who made a glorious non-discriminatory and laudable statement.

        Yes, by naming ‘terrorism’ as the enemy while saying islam is great – he’s actually doing the right thing because it hamstrings muslims from doing their regular ‘muslim persecution’ routine? I get it.

        But I’d bet Jan Hammacek doesn’t know he’s doing the right thing. Or are Czech politicians far cleverer than we think?

        1. Nay: he gives them a tent to cover their guilt as they pursue their genocidal Jihad.

          We must rip off the tent and expose the mercenary mission & martial methods of Islam to the eyes of the world.

          Regardless of our approval or disapproval, the bloody doctrines on display in “The Book Of Jihad” and clearly evident in the videos published by the Isdamnic State, come directly from the Koran & sunnah.

        2. “Let’s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds, that what we fight against is terror, not islam. That islamophobia is as abhorrent and dangerous as racism and antisemitisim and is to be suppressed by all legal means.

          The czech politician stated “Let’s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds,

          Yup deeds. Lets lets see further..

          Poland, Czech Republic Join Slovakia=> Will Only Accept Christian Migrants From Syria

          http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08/poland-czech-republic-join-slovakia-will-only-accept-christian-families-from-syria/

          and just 500 a year. Only Christians need apply.

          Thats what counts – deeds .

          As I’ve said before for a long time , there is a duplicity everywhere in this war. Orban from Hungary is breaking ranks, and he is being criticised for it.

  8. Uncle Vladd

    Thank you for your response.

    As I said, if one names Islam as the enemy, then there is no alternative but to stop all Muslim immigration. This may be just about feasible at the moment. But, we have to also remove all Muslims from the West, if Islam is the enemy. That is not politically feasible at the moment. It may be if one correctly plays the step by step approach, but at the moment is it is not.

    Therefore to name Islam as the enemy is pointless ,as it serves no useful purpose – quite the contrary.

    1. Camel Shit!!!! A wise Chink said “know your enemy”. He was correct.

      Western Civilization can not survive it it maintains PC.

      The political will required to deport enemy invaders and stop the invasion will never develop until the identity of the enemy is widely understood.

      The political will required to make Islam extinct will never develop until Muslims are identified as the enemy and Islam as the doctrine set that makes them inimical.

      No sane person would paint a skunk black or cut off a snake’s rattles. Pretending that Islam is passive and anodyne is suicidal; we must quit doing it!!!

  9. What the media does not want to admit is that this is not a “war” problem, but an Islam problem. Just like WWII was not a “war” problem but a Nazi problem. Have maintained this since 9/11, as Sheilkh might remember from early LGF days.

    However, we have not yet arrived at the stage where Islam can be stated as the problem, and acceptable in the West as a whole. GWB stated that this war will last 50 years or more. Many a thing can happen before that – politics, strategies and policies will change.

    The refugee migrant crisis is one such. One can see the politics changing. When one hears from a leadingf p;olitician , “Therefore let´s make it absolutely clear not only in words, but especially in deeds, that what we fight against is terror, not islam”, then one knows that he felt it necessary to say so.

    There is a long way to go yet. Western coivilisation will survive as long as our politicians do not believe in their own propaganda.

    The refugees are feeing Islam, even though the refugees themselves wont admit it.

Comments are closed.