Australia Grants “Extremist” & “Controversial” Dutch MP A Visa

His Visa has been granted in time for the ALA Party launch. 

Controversial Dutch MP Geert Wilders granted visa for Perth anti-Islam party political launch
EXTREMIST Dutch member of parliament Geert Wilders has been granted a visa to come to Australia.–NEWS.COM.AU
.

This is so perverse. A Newscorp scribbler calls Geert Wilders “extremist”, a man who already suffered more than 10 years under so called fartwas (religious death sentences)  in his home country; a man who stands for freedom, equality, democracy and western civilisation. So really, he has been “granted a visa”, as if there was any reason to withhold it! And what exactly is “controversial?”  To oppose Islamic savagery, FGM, polygamy, child marriage, wife beating and honour killings? WTF is “controversial” or “extremist” about opposing the head choppers and the global jihad? The journallie is despicable. These people are the dumbest swine on earth.

EXTREMIST Dutch member of parliament Geert Wilders has been granted a visa to come to Australia.

The right wing politician will come to Perth to help launch a party that’s core aim is to “stop the Islamisation of Australia”.

National president of the Australian Liberty Alliance Party, Debbie Robinson, confirmed on Thursday night that Mr Wilders’ visa had been issued and his visit would go ahead as planned.

It is the second time the leader of The Netherlands’ Partij voor de Vrijheid — Party for Freedom — has visited Australia.

On his last visit in 2013, Premier Colin Barnett said Mr Wilders was “not welcome” in WA and his talk in Melbourne erupted in violent protests.

During this trip, Mr Wilders will give the keynote address at the party launch of Australian Liberty Alliance on Tuesday, October 20 in Perth.

As revealed by The Sunday Times last year, City Beach orthopedic surgeon Anthony Robinson and his wife Debbie are among five directors of Australian Liberty Alliance.

Ms Robinson is also president of the Q Society of Australia, which describes itself as “Australia’s leading Islamic critical movement”.

Ms Robinson welcomed news of Mr Wilders’ visa being granted.

Originally published as Anti-Islam Dutch MP granted Visa

5 thoughts on “Australia Grants “Extremist” & “Controversial” Dutch MP A Visa”

  1. Yes I always wondered what was “controversial” or “extremist” about Geert Wilders.

    Especially since the word extremist is issued now to replace Islamic terror.

    1. Resisting the Islamic expansion project makes us just like Islamic terrorists. This harebrained BS has been the meme of Islamic taqiyya gigolos and leftist loons for a long time.

  2. I hope Mr. Wilders will be well guarded during his trip to Australia. Mr. Turnbull’s cultured new friends can not be trusted.

  3. HERE IS A COMMENT (NOT MINE) LEFT ON A BLOG DESCRIBING THE TIME-LINE OF EVENTS LEADING UP TO “CLOCK-BOY”‘S 15 MINUTES OF FAME.
    _________________________________________________________________

    The true story of Ahmed and his so called clock
    On the morning of Sept 14, Mohamed El Hassan Mohamed drove his son Ahmed to school and at that time, according to NBC Dallas/Ft.Worth, Mohamed “encouraged him to demonstrate his gift of technology” at the school. He was referring to a small plain metal case, inside of which contained the hastily arranged and unshielded electronic components of a 1980’s Micronta digital alarm clock. A device Ahmed would repeatedly insist he threw together the night before in just 15 minutes from of “scraps” laying around his house, a device that he himself considered to appear suspicious and threatening.
    Defying common sense, it appears that Mohamed, the man who runs the National Reform Party of Sudan, who is considered an enlightened scholar in Sudan, who ran for its presidency twice in the last 5 years, whose daughter was suspended from school for a bomb threat, whose son was detained and suspended for multiple disciplinary problems and electronic pranks, in a town recently rocked by a double murder honor killing and lies 25 minutes from the Garland TX Jihadi attack, on the first day back to school after the anniversary of 9-11, encourages his son to bring in a nondescript metal case with a timer and loose wiring inside without being asked to by any teacher, a device even his son admits looked threatening and suspicious.
    Next we are told by Ahmed that he shows the device to his 1st period Science teacher who sensitively and politely tells him the device is “nice” but it looks like a bomb and so he should put it away and not take it out and show it to anyone else at school.
    According to Mark Cuban who spoke with an Irving resident who’s friend is a teacher in Mac Arthur H.S., Ahmed proceeded to show off the device to each teacher all the way to 6th period where in English class, Ahmed claims to have plugged the device into the wall outlet and set the alarm to go off in the middle of class “to show a friend”. When the teacher reacted to the disruption he “unplugged it right away”. After showing the English teacher what caused the disruption, the teacher told him it looks like a bomb, that it is making her nervous and would make others nervous, and to put it away in his backpack, to which Ahmed said “I don’t think it looks like a bomb”. At the end of class the device was confiscated and the Principal alerted. The Irving school system adheres to a zero tolerance policy regarding threatening devices, and being that the possession of such a device with intent to alarm others is a criminal offense in Texas, the police were called to question Ahmed and determine what his intentions were. Later 3 teachers would sign a complaint to the police about a hoax bomb, as the Principal decided to contact the police on the issue.
    The police arrived at school and entered the conference room where Ahmed was detained and one officer claimed “that is who I thought it was”. Likely referring to Ahmed’s past troubles and his family’s notoriety. The police questioned Ahmed, and claimed he was not forthcoming, passive aggressive, and would not directly answer their questions. They decided to arrest him for possession of a hoax bomb and bring him to the police station where they would continue their investigation to determine whether he intended to raise alarm with his device, a Class A misdemeanor.
    Somehow or other it appears Ahmed’s 18 year old sister Eyman found out that Ahmed was being taken to the police station. There is an iconic photo of Ahmed in handcuffs taken by Eyman, and some captions under that photo indicate it was taken at the police station. This implies his sister arrived shortly after Ahmed arrived, because he would not have been in handcuffs after he was released without charge an hour later. There is also speculation Eyman took the photo as Ahmed was leaving the school in handcuffs.
    Ahmed’s father claims the first he heard of his son’s problem was from a phone call from the police. We do not know if he arrived with or separate from Eyman. It is hard to believe Eyman heard about the incident and arrived at the police station to take that photo and never alerted her father. If Eyman only knew through her father, this would mean they both arrived at the station in time to see Ahmed before he went in a private room for questioning. Improbable but possible. The father’s account follows.
    **The first he heard of it was when he received a call from police, who said his son was being charged with having a hoax bomb, Mohamed said.
    He rushed to the police station, where he saw his son “surrounded by five police and he was handcuffed,” the father said. Ahmed told his father he’d asked to phone him but the police told him he could not because he was under arrest, Mohamed said.
    “I asked if I could talk to or speak to my son and they told me, ‘No, not right now’ because they were taking his fingerprints and asking him questions,” Mohamed said. “I asked if I could see the thing they were calling a bomb. The police never let me even see it but I knew what my son brought to school. It was an alarm clock that he made. He wakes up with it most mornings. **
    Here we have Mohamed contradicting his son’s claim the device was hastily thrown together the night before. His credibility as a responsible parent and supervisor of his child already strained to the limit, he goes on to claim, “my son was hurt and tortured and arrested and mistreated in front of his friends at school”.
    After further questioning, the police could not find anything in Ahmed’s statements to indicate he intended to cause alarm, and released him without charge.
    The family went on to set off a social media firestorm portraying Ahmed as persecuted and harassed, “hurt and tortured” by Islamophobic xenophobic, vindictive officials from the school and police station, holding press conferences where suddenly their son was able to speak in great detail about the incident, as opposed to the “name rank and serial number” routine he gave the police.
    There was never a moment where Mohamed El Hassan expressed even a small fraction of responsibility as the parent the person at the center of this incident. No apology or humility, only strident arrogant and slanderous accusations issued from him. Even today as Ahmed has been seen laughing, joking, and smiling all across the USA as he visits dozens of august institutions and famous talk shows that roll out the red carpet for the self proclaimed “inventor of a clock”, his family insists Ahmed is “severely traumatized” and “lacking appetite and ability to sleep”. Furthermore Mohamed refused to accept the police repeated offer to come pick up the device, while hiring lawyers to sue the police, in part, for refusing to release the device to the family. The family has refused to sign a waiver allowing the school and police from telling their side of the story to the media, while they continue to offer a contradictory version that evolves daily, along side baseless and slanderous accusations against officials.
    According to Ahmed’s own words, his authority figure (Science teacher) confirmed Ahmed’s own perception and told him his device looked like a bomb and not to show it to anyone. Ahmed then set the alarm on the device in the middle of class. He appears to have had the intent to evoke some reaction. His actions were reckless, and arguably criminal. Yet the media continues to portray him as a persecuted victim, even as he and his family stood in NYC with the Mayor who proclaimed 9/29/2015 as “Ahmed day”, before flying to Mecca to thank Allah for their victory over the gullible infidels.
    In Heaven that day the Angels weeped while the founding fathers of America looked on in astonishment at how far their republic has fallen into absurdity.
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Don Laird
    Alberta, Canada

Comments are closed.