[T]he problem with moderate Muslims is not that they are jihadists but that they are Muslim

Right Now 59% of Americans Have a Favorable View of Muslims – Wait for a Few More San Bernardinos

(There is no way to ascertain whether 59% of Americans have a favourable view of Muslims. I find that claim rather doubtful.– SY)

By Bernie / Plancks Constant

sharia of liberty
Which Will America Choose?
Photo Credit: The EOS Horizon


Ihave long maintained that the United States should not allow Muslims into our countrynor to build mosquesnor allow them to join our military.

Those who do not understand Islam will argue that 99% of Muslims are peaceful and that only a small percentage are extremist. In my article Deporting Muslims and Banning Mongoose, I wrote:

[T]he problem with moderate Muslims is not that they are jihadists but that they are Muslim.

Jihadists will not turn America into a Muslim country no matter how many cities they blow up, no matter how many buildings they bring down, no matter how many innocent lives are lost in a coffee-shop suicide bombing; no, I am not worried about extremists, there are only a few hundred thousand of them at most anyway. The problem is the tens of millions of moderate Muslims who infiltrate a country.
Once we have imported a few million more Muslims, then the natural process of immigration and fertility will take over. Muslim immigrants will bring their wives, sisters, mothers, brothers, uncles, fathers and any other relatives. These other family members, once here, will achieve what the terrorists with their suicide vests cannot: the conversion of our land into an Islamic craphole.

Won’t happen? It happened to the more than 50 countries that were at one time Muslim-free and are now Islamic nations.

That is why Trump is right about banning Muslim immigration. Those who understand the threat posed by Islam agree with Trump. Liberals have a mental disease which prevents them from seeing that threat clearly. That is why Republicans tend to agree with Trump while Democrats, sad to say, do not.

An NBC/Wall Street Journal survey found that 57 percent of all those polled opposed Mr. Trump’s idea. Wait until we have an epidemic of San Bernardinos, then we will see how many turn in favor of a ban on Muslim immigration. I believe one day the western world will have to begin deporting Muslims when it becomes unbearable.

Listen to his reasons why a ban is necessary in this video:

I found this comment interesting:

As usual the media have it wrong. Even the right leaning FOX News has it wrong. Trump said stop all Muslims from entering the country until we figure out what is going on. He did NOT say round up all Muslims. He id NOT say stop all Muslims from entering the country forever. He could not have been more clear, except to add that many Muslims (those who believe and subscribe to the Islamic “religion”) may belong to that group of Islamists who believe in and practice a political takeover of other ideologies, countries and religions.

Firstly, Islam is NOT a religion. But, IF it were, it would also have to be declared as also a political movement. Yes, we do not want a political movement coming into the USA that has the intent of destroying the USA.

(That comment suggests that a religion has to be ‘good’,  or for the ‘common good’, which Islam is not. However, there is no requirement for a religion to be good,  and Islam doesn’t require its adherents to be good, except in spreading Islam and to relieve the unbelievers of their wealth and their heads.–SY)

Yes, until “we” (our totally politically correct and corrupt political administration) figure “it: out. “It” being the 5 simple (stupid-non-sense) vetting questions which allow practically anyone to jihadists enter the USA. viz “Do you intend to do any harm?” Duh? They are jihadists. They are going to KILL people. Of course they would not lie. Double Duh!

That’s a vetting process? Yes, let’s figure out what is going on, by God!

Trump as Hitler? Hardly. The media spun it so much that even Benjamin of Israel does not even want to see Trump. Wake up Benny! Krauthammer use your brain.

6 thoughts on “[T]he problem with moderate Muslims is not that they are jihadists but that they are Muslim”

  1. “Right Now 59% of Americans Have a Favorable View of Muslims”

    Define “favorable ” for me first.

  2. The problem with moderate Muslims is that unlike their Jihadi brethren, we don’t see them a s a threat. In reality, it is moderate Muslims, once are a majority, will vote for Sharia. And of opposed, all of them will become Jihadis.

    That will be the end of Western civilisation. Even the Nazis did not pose such an existential threat.

    1. I just had another leftoid tell me that Obama cannot possibly be a Muslim because he is clean shaven, and drinks and smokes. Hopeless.

      1. Daniel Pipes tried to scold Trump by asserting that he should “ban islamists, not muslims!” here:

        Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims

        http://www.danielpipes.org/16331/trump-ban-islamists-not-muslims

        He also tried to pretend Americans who want to control their own borders are being “un-Constitutional.” But since when did the US constitution cover non US citizens?!

        … so Dajjal and I decided to set the record straight, with this:

        http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/226955

        What defines a “muslim?” What is a “muslim” supposed – by their own rules – to do and think, and not to do and not to think? Let’s look at their own most sahih (official) scriptures’ definitions of “muslims:”

        Muhammad, as “Al-Insan al-kamil,” is set up by 33.21 and 68.4 as the role model for all Muslims to emulate. He said that he was “raised for Jihad and not for tillage”. He said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear; look it up in Fath al-Bari if you don’t know what that means. He said that he was “made victorious with terror”. He commanded his followers, speaking for Allah, to “strike terror” and “terrify thereby”. He said that Allah would cover the Muslims with a blanket of disgrace if they abandoned Jihad in favor of trade, commerce and agriculture.

        The role model for all Muslims to emulate burned the date trees of one Jewish settlement to terrorize them. He terrorized the Jews of Medina by having Kab Ashraf assassinated. He terrorized one Arab tribe into submission by having Asma bint Marwan assassinated. He sent extortion letters to regional rulers threatening to kill them and enslave their children if they did not submit. That is what Islam is; what Muslims do.

        The few who will read 8.67, 109.2 and Sahih Bukhari 4.52.164 will know that Allah is not God.

        Islam has a standard: Qur’an & Sunnah. Its what Moe said and did according to the oral traditions of his companions. 2.85 prohibits dividing the Qur’an, its all or nothing. 2.216 ordains Jihad for Muslims. 8.39 commands perpetual war against pagans until Allah has a global monopoly. 8.57 & 8.60 command terrorism. 8.67 requires “great slaughter” as Moe’s price of admission to Allah’s celestial bordello. 9.120 promises Brownie Points for any “step” taken to “injure or enrage” disbelievers. 9.111& 49.15 define believers as those who fight in Allah’s cause. 33.21 sets up Moe as a role model for Muslims to emulate. Read the TOC of “The Life Of Muhammad” to see what he did. One attack every six weeks for the last decade of his life.

        A Muslim who does not support Jihad including terror as a battle tactic, is a hypocrite, 4.89, not a believer as described in 8.1-5, 9.111& 49.15.

        3.110 makes Muslims out to be the “best of peoples for the people”. Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 explains that they are the best as they drag us to Islam with chains on our necks.

        Is Muhammad representative of Muslims? Got a clue what he did? Got a clue what he said about terrorism? Got a clue what Allah said about it?

        If they sincerely denounce terror, they are hypocrites or apostates, not Muslims. I direct your attention to “Reliance Of The Traveller” o8.0–8.7 which specifies the death penalty for any of a list of 20 attitudes and actions including denial of any part of the Qur’an. In this case 8.12, 57 & 60; 9.111, 120; 33.26-27 & 59.2.

        NOW, LET’S LOOK AT WHETHER BANNING “MUSLIMS” IS “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” – OR NOT:

        Most basically: Since islam requires its muslim members to adhere to criminal principles which are in direct conflict with the US Constitution, and Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution requires the President elect to take the Oath or Affirmation to: “… preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” the only sane and logical way to keep that oath, is to REQUIRE the crime-gang of islam be banned!

        For instance:

        Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or abridging the free exercise thereof.

        Islam demands that it be the only recognized religion, that all others be suppressed.

        That contravenes the Constitution.

        The first amendment also provides congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech and press.

        Islam demands the death penalty for reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.

        Islam contravenes the Constitution.

        Art. 6 proscribes religious test for office.

        Islamic law requires that all officers be Muslim, declaring that infidels have no right to authority even over infidels.

        Islam contravenes the Constitution.

        Islam pretends to be the law of universal application, to be imposed upon the entire world by force. 8.39, 9.29 & 9.33 are clues for the clueless. See also Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

        The Constitution is not a suicide pact. It does not require us to harbor enemy combatants and fifth columns.

        Islam is permanent war. In 1778 Barbary Pirates attacked our shipping. Adams & Jefferson asked why and were told it was written in their laws that all who had not submitted to Islam were fair prey. Look up the Barbary Wars at Wikipedia and read the full quote.

        The hadith which substantiates that quote is long and convoluted, but when you get to the paydirt, you will recognize it easily. http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/004.053.386.html

        Islam is an enemy at war against us, no more protected by the Constitution than Nazism. It can not be tolerated.

        Moreover:

        Islam was banned from the USA in 1952, but Obama doesn’t want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law.

        The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”

        This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

        All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.

        Now the politically correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion.

        Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

        FINALLY:

        U.S. Code § 1182 – Inadmissible aliens

        (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President:

        “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Comments are closed.