Tell Mama‘s mendacious grievance monger, Fiyaz Mughal, who should have had his funding withdrawn in 2013, is at it again. Here he attacks outspoken Islam critic Katie Hopkins for this tweet:
Was Muhammad a rapist? Were his companions rapists? Is the rape of infidel women forbidden or permissible under Islamic law?
Katie Hopkins, ever the self-publicist, has done it again. In the desire to play to an audience that is distrustful of Muslims and who may never have taken the time to get to know Muslims, Hopkins has once again, pushed the boundaries in packaging Muslims as being deviant.
“Muslim men raping white women is consistent with the teaching of Islam. Revoke their citizenship and deport the bastards. Asian my arse.”
The tweet infers that Muslims (note that she makes no distinction between Muslims), rape white women and that it is a religious directive of sorts. The text is clear on the following. That Islam teaches Muslim men to rape white women. On this point, there is no wiggle room on the tweet. It is clear.
Taking this point alone, the statement does not stand up and if we were to use the same logic, it could be said that Christian men were raping Muslim women in Bosnia in line with the teaching of the Christian church.
Tu quoque and a logical fallacy. It is disputed that “Christian men” raped Muslim women in Bosnia. However, rape of infidel women is sanctioned in Qu’ran and the sunna. Rape is certainly is not in line with the teaching of the Christian church. The argument falls flat on its face. (SY)
Not only would such a statement by inflammatory, it would also be wrong. Whilst it could be strongly argued that the Church in Serbia sanctioned the brutal war against Croatia and Bosnia and in some instances, specific churches and priests sanctioned the use of brutal violence and sexual violence against Muslims in Bosnia, suggesting that Christianity drove such a lust for rape against Muslim women in Bosnia would be incendiary and deeply inflammatory. Yet, you can see the support for such rhetoric that is out there on social media which is deeply troubling and worrying.
There is no evidence for these claims. The Church in Serbia sanctioned no such thing, especially not ” brutal violence and sexual violence against Muslims in Bosnia”.
Hopkins also plays to the ‘impulsive’, ‘uncontrollable’, and ‘sexually predatory’ tropes that were associated with the Black man who was enslaved in plantations and which has been a constant in the framing of men from non-white communities. Native Americans were also framed in this way, Jews were framed in this way in Germany in the 1930’s and young African Caribbean men were and continue to be framed in this way since they arrived in our country in the 1950’s.
Fayaz Mughal’s fantasies are running wild. His imagery is remarkable. His victimhood schtick second to none. This is tripe from a trained Mohammedan agitprop.
So there is nothing different here, yet it must also be acknowledged that the activities in Rotherham, Rochdale and Oxford need to be looked at in light of the perpetrators and we must stand front and centre with the victims who suffered the most brutal abuse and worst still, being denied justice for so many years. It is telling that Hopkins chooses not to stand on this point but to punch buttons around all Muslims being potential rapists.
“Tell Mama” never stood “front and centre with the victims who suffered the most brutal abuse”. On the contrary, they whined about victimhood and “Islamophobia”. If Katie Hopkins points out that Muslims rape infidel women because Muhammad, the perfect man for all time and any place did it, she is right on the money.
We would also like to add that we will be writing to the Metropolitan Police Service today on this material. This is not a one-off and there are a series of tweets that have been made before that are deeply troubling.
Sure. The Met will crack down on Katie Hopkins “hate speech”. Just like they went after the producers of “Undercover Mosque”, instead of cleaning up the Muslim mosques.
pig sty’s .
Furthermore, we will be writing to Twitter to take action in relation to accounts that promote such wide sweeping bigoted statements and which are more about playing to an audience, than remembering about the victims of such abuse who deserve our support.
Twitter is already owned by the Mohammedans, so there goes freedom of speech again.