Hanson wants a royal commission into whether Islam is a religion or a political ideology

Better get that right. If this backfires we are in deep shiite.

Hanson calls for no more mosques to be built and a royal commission into Islam

Senator-elect Pauline Hanson spoke to the media in Brisbane on Monday saying she wants a royal commission into whether Islam is a religion or a political ideology.

She says it’s clear from Saturday’s vote for One Nation that a significant number of Australians back what she has to say on that issue.

Hanson has called for no more mosques to be built and also to stop Muslim immigration into Australia.

Ms Hanson also wants to abolish the Racial Discrimination Act and wants a referendum on changing the part of the constitution that protects the free practice of religion.

She says Australia is a Christian country and it’s time to take a look at the rise of Islam, and what is being preached inside mosques and Islamic schools.

“You have our values, our culture, and our way of life,” she said in Brisbane on Monday.

“You don’t have a full burqa.

“You don’t keep putting up mosques.

“I’d like to know what they are actually teaching in those schools and what’s being said in the mosques. You can’t deny the fact that in these mosques they’ve been known to preach hate towards us.

“Is this a society we want to live in? I don’t believe it is.

“Do you want to see terrorism on our streets here?”

 

AU.NEWS.YAHOO.COM

The soon-to-be senator is also confident her One Nation Party will win at least four, and possibly even as many as six Senate seats, and says Family Law reform, creating jobs and putting the brakes on foreign investment are among her top priorities.

She said she would also like a Royal Commission into the banking and finance sector.

“Again we have families that are losing their family homes, their properties, by the banking sector that I believe needs a full investigation into it.

“Because documentation that I have seen clearly shows that signatures have been forged.”

Ms Hanson says that 20 years after her maiden speech to the federal parliament, when she warned Australia was in danger of being “swamped by Asians” some in places like Hurstville in Sydney would agree that’s played out.

“They feel that they have been swamped by Asians,” she told reporters in Brisbane.

“And regardless of that now, a lot of Australians feel that Asians are buying up prime agricultural land, housing.”

She said she was not in favour of returning to a White Australia policy, but a return to the old-fashioned values that made the nation great.

“Clearly the way our nation is going is not in the right direction.”

Earlier today, Pauline Hanson said senior Liberal George Brandis has called her office as the major parties open talks with crossbenchers amid the uncertain election result.

The One Nation Party leader says she’s yet to speak to Senator Brandis, but will listen to what he has to say.

She’s promised to work with either a Labor or coalition government, even if they don’t want her in Canberra.

“I know they have all said that they won’t work with me or I’m not welcome in parliament. I am entitled to my seat as much as any other elected member of parliament,” Hanson told the media in Brisbane on Monday.

Back from the political graveyard, the Senator-elect was not afraid to assert her newfound authority.

Hanson told media she will urge whichever party forms government to have an inquiry into the banks – a platform Labor’s Bill Shorten stood for before the election, but one Malcolm Turnbull has ruled out entirely.

Perhaps that is why the former fish-and-chip shop owner has not heard from the Prime Minister since the election count entered a deadlock on Saturday night.

“I think he’s lost my number,” the Queenslander told Sunrise host Sam Armytage when appearing on the broadcast on Monday morning.

Asked if the opposition leader had been in contact, Ms Hanson laughed.

“You’ve got to be kidding,” she told Seven Network.

“At this point I am totally independent, maybe not like everybody else.”

That is certainly true for some of her party’s other policy positions.

The One Nation party also wants to ban the burqa and the niquab in public, ban the building of mosques until an enquiry is held and the ban Halal certifications.

The One Nation leader is also believed to be reaching out to unions and workers before she decides her stance on the Australian Building and Construction Commission and the Registered Organisation Bill.

Hanson served one term as an MP from 1996 to 1998, but the short stint started a movement.

In her return, Hanson could bring another One Nation party member, running mate Mal Roberts, to the upper house.

Green leader Richard Di Natale has already said his party will make the One Nation leader’s time in the Senate easy.

“We will take it right up to her, to show that in a modern Australia there is no place for racism, there is no place for bigotry, for the sort of hatred that she is spreading through her views,” Senator Di Natale said.

Hanson will join a number of Senators on the crossbenchers, including Derryn Hinch, Jacqui Lambie along with Nick Xenophon and another member of his team.

Hinch said he “spent 50 minutes on the phone last night with the Prime Minister of Australia” Malcolm Turnbull.

“On Friday, I got a call from Bill Shorten wishing me well,” he added.

Lower house independents say no deals with Labor of Liberals 

Two of the crossbenchers who could decide the next federal government won’t commit to supporting the coalition or Labor before the new parliament sits.

Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie told ABC radio on Monday he would sit through a confidence motion debate on the first day of parliament before deciding who to support for government.

Similarly, Cathy McGowan says she’ll apply her personal moral compass along with a sense of what is best for her Indi electorate and the nation in deciding how to vote.

 

10 thoughts on “Hanson wants a royal commission into whether Islam is a religion or a political ideology”

  1. If Islam’s tax free status as a religion is revoked, this would change everything.
    Also – it would be interesting to try the apostasy laws in the International Court of Justice.

  2. This is so simple even a leftist can (but probably won’t want to) get it:

    Muhammad rode around Arabia robbing enslaving and murdering people for “disbelieving” in his “unknown and unknowable god.”

    HOW THE FUCK CAN ANYONE ‘BELIEVE’ IN AN ‘UNKNOWABLE’ GOD?!

    If and when you claim your god is unknowable, you’re the one who is limiting it’s ability to explain itself! You’re the one who is basically saying it doesn’t exist! You’re the one saying that your “god” isn’t a personal or compassionate one, but is one which either can’t or chooses not to relate to its subjects! You’re the atheist, and your version of a ‘god’ doesn’t exist!

    When your ‘god’ is really only generally “everything!” then it’s also only specifically NOTHING!

    CASE CLOSED!

  3. Islam is not even a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) much less a “superior” one.

    Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

    “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

    -Muhammad-

    Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

    Islam itself is only a gigantic, convoluted, victim-blaming slanderous example of an Argumentum Tu Quoque theodicy!

    “Muhammad isn’t an evil criminal because we all (i.e: you, ALLAH) do it, too! Whee!”

    Just look up all the “In the Way of Allah” references: what do they have in common? As also described explicitly in the Qur’ime manual, “allah” is both unknown, and unknowable – he’s just evil random violence and sudden death! Chaos!

    The whole chapter / sura about Moses, shows how “allah” kills off innocent people who “would have” otherwise become “evil,” and replaces them with “better” people. And the whole “moral” of the story is: YOU do not know; only “allah” knows, and he only tells Gebril to tell Muhammad to tell you about any of it!

    Sura 4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
    “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

    Allah’s supposed “oneness” with his creation is thus crucial to Muhammad’s eternal theodicy alibi-excuse for his many crimes, and it’s also blatantly, inherently ANTI-God, because when one’s “God” is generally ‘EVERYTHING!’ then it’s also implicitly, specifically ‘NOTHING!’ Existentialism IS Nihilism!

    Islam IS Atheism!

    The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is ever really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

    “The Allah Made Me Do It!”
    “In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

    [8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

    “Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them” – 9:14-15

    And, more, Islam has sentenced all the world’s non-muslims to “Death By Muslim” for our crime of not being muslims.*

    Obviously, the muslims have no “faith” in even their god’s own power nor desire to enforce even it’s own basic us-versus-them and might-makes-right principles, because while, at worst, all real religions only say:

    “Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

    ONLY islam says:

    “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

    Obviously, a forced “Faith!” isn’t any kind of a “Faith!” whatsoever – islam isn’t a religion at all, it’s only extortion!

    And extortion is ALWAYS a CRIME!

    *Of course, for all you selfish subjectively-oriented libertine “liberals” out there, this sad fate can be easily avoided by mumbling some magic words called “the shahada” in Arabic, and by adopting proper attire, but there’s still an unfortunate degree of risk involved, in that you will then also have thereby personally become part of that “death by muslim” function yourself, as they fit you out for your very own shiny new suicide vest with its integral explosive belt. Be proud of your new fashion-statement accessory; you’ve certainly earned it.

    😉

    Christianity, on the other hand, represents free-will conscience and so potential guilt for not doing one’s best; so since liberals, being criminals, hate all notions of personal, self-reliant responsibility, and in stead choose to favor pre-deterministic alibi excuses to pretend they had no choice but to commit their crimes, must hate Christianity and its symbols, whether or not it’s true. Same for muslims, who are also morally delinquent atheists, because their idolatrous version of a god doesn’t give them free-will responsibility, but only enslaves them and forces them to do both good and bad things! Idolatry is immorality because it’s only an alibi-excuse for one to avoid all self-reliant responsibility. Religion is idolatry.

    …….

    When you run around robbing enslaving and murdering everyone for their “disbelieving” in your “unknown and unknowable” god, it’s obviously only an excuse for your crimes. Because the only god which is presented as “unknowable” is one that cannot exist; your claims are putting limits on its own ability to explain itself to you and others; Muhammad was basically resorting to childish violence in order to claim his “god” didn’t really exist! So he was either a serious atheist (&/or Satanist) saying “you must disbelieve in a comprehensible, conscious and compassionate god or I will prove it doesn’t exist by injuring you and thus demonstrating that it won’t stop me!” or he was just making up his alibis for his crimes as he went along.

    Or both!

    Seriously, how can anyone be rationally accused of disbelieving in an unknowable god?!

  4. Moslems do not admire, love, nor reason with their god, but only fear and obey Muhammad’s version of a fake god, which, since it’s described as both unknown and unknowable, doesn’t actually exist at all (when your ‘god’ is generally “everything,” then it’s also specifically “nothing;” existentialism IS nihilism). If it’s not separate from it’s alleged creation, and you can’t communicate with it, nor does it respond to your prayers (even Muhammad, while he prayed to allah, was only answered by Gebril, and angel, because allah doesn’t even directly answer prayers) then it doesn’t actually exist at all! A non-interactive god isn’t a god, it’s only an idol – an excuse for their own fearsome crimes.

    Next, all moslems are atheists, because they have absolutely NO FAITH at all in their ‘god,’ even in its own ability nor desire to uphold even its own us-versus-them and might-makes-right creed. At worst, all real religions only say:

    “Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

    But ONLY islam says:

    “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

    😉

  5. Moslems have no real “faith” because their description of their allah is that he/it is unknown and unknowable (so why listen to Big Moe?) and since allah has been generalized as the indivisible EVERYTHING, it is also therefore specifically NOTHING! Existentialism IS nihilism!
    It isn’t Ha-Shem, only Shit-Happens!

    4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
    “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

    Moe said allah is unknowable to us; he cannot make himself understood to us! Which leaves only Moe’s words in the Qur’an as a substitute for god! And the Qur’an says only those who kill others and die for Moe, will go to heaven, while those who do not kill and die for Moe, implicitly deny his version of a god, and so will go to hell! And this is also why islam doesn’t separate the religious and secular realms: because Moe’s word concerning “allah” is absolute extortion, and it’s not open to individual interpetation. It’s: Submit, or die!

    As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

    Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

    “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

    -Muhammad-

    Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

    The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is every really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

    “The Allah Made Me Do It!”
    “In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

    [8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

    So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

    Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

    “God told us to commit these crimes! Whee!”

    ;-(

    (Capisce?)!

    Since allah planned everything, and allah IS (only) everything, then he is also not outside of everything, and so cannot be appealed to. Like Muhammad, one may pray to allah, but at best only one of his angels (Gebril, in Moe’s personal case) will ever actually bother to answer you. As even Muhammad admitted, Allah (God) Himself never actually spoke directly to Muhammad.

    Contrast that with Christianity, which posits that, just because God might be too complex for us to understand Him, doesn’t mean that God can’t understand us, nor that He can’t make Himself understood to us on our own terms, through His incarnation as Jesus. And Jesus said we weren’t to kill each other, but to learn to progress through trust and cooperation. Therefore Jesus, the Jew, advised we separate the church from the state, and the individual’s spiritual development from the drudgeries of earthly maintenance, with his ‘Render Unto Caesar’ speech.

    And it’s always a case of Authority VERSUS true Morality!

    In general, no force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can (or will) govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT (or will not) govern themselves.

    This notion isn’t a new one, either:

    “Good people don’t need laws to tell them to act responsibily, and bad people will find a way around laws.”

    -Plato

    The two creeds are EXACT OPPOSITES. Islam is God-Is-Good-denying Satanic atheism; SATANISLAM!

  6. You can’t separate the secular from the “religious” in islam, simply because it’s really always been ALL only a secular (us-versus-them, and might-makes-right) affair anyway!

    Moslems ARE atheists!

    While all “real” religions, at WORST, only say:

    “Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

    ONLY islam says:

    “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

    So obviously, moslems are only atheists because they have NO faith in their god’s abilities or desires to pay any attention to them or to anyone alse ever anyway, not even a desire nor ability to enforce even it’sown us-versus-them, might-makes-right creed.

    Allah is described in the Qur’an as a big, bad, remote, scary thing, so the group called “islam” and it’s rule-book, the Qur’an, are the only gods they can worship and obey.

    So, static islam itself is the false idol they continue to worship – and it’s about as responsive to human needs as the rocks they used to worship!

    The moslems only Submit – to Pain as their “god!” They Submit to Failure, to inferiority, to victimology, and pretend that Giving Up is a ‘holy virtue, inshallah akhbar!’

    MOSLEMS FEAR ALLAH, AS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO IMAGINE ANYTHING WORSE THAN AN OMNISCIENT, OMNIPOTENT, CAPRICIOUS UNKNOWABLE AND UNKNOWN BEING. COMPARED TO SUCH A THREAT, EVEN THE HOPE OF IT’S OPPOSITE – OF A RATIONAL SET OF PRINCIPLES AND PHYSICAL LAWS LIMITING SUCH A BEAST – SEEMS DANGEROUSLY NAIVE AND IN FACT LIKELY TO FOCUS ITS WRATHFUL AND PAINFUL ATTENTIONS ON THE IMAGINER.

    THUS ALLAH IS PORTRAYED AS ONLY HATING THE NOTION THAT IT’S POWER IS LIMITED OR SPLIT; THAT IT IS, IN FACT, LESS THAN OMNIPOTENT. SO ALL SHARIA ‘LAWS’ BASED ON THIS SUBJECTIVE FEAR ARE NATURALLY AND BY DEFINITION, DELIBERATELY IRRATIONAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT CANNOT BE HELD TO CONSTRAIN ALLAH’S POWERS OF INFLICTING RANDOM PAIN)!

    THUS TO MOSLEMS, ALL FACTS ARE ONLY OPINIONS, BECAUSE NO ONE CAN EVER KNOW ANYTHING, SINCE ALLAH IS IN CHARGE AND HE CAN ALWAYS CHANGE HIS MIND ABOUT ANYTHING &/OR EVERYTHING ANYWAY!

    IDOLATRY is an excuse to remain criminally, negligently, delinquently irrational; to enjoy the “right” to remain ignorantly, irresponsibly WRONG! (“The Allah Made Us Do It”)!

    To criminals who pretend to believe that all facts are only opinions, of course all laws are also held by them to be only suggestions! AND VICE-VERSA!

    THEY HAVE NO PRINCIPLES BEYOND THIS CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT, DELINQUENT TREASON TO RATIONALITY!

    IF SOMETHING HAPPENED, THEN ALLAH WILLED IT TO HAPPEN, SO IT CAN’T HAVE BEEN BAD, BY DEFINITION! MIGHT MAKES RIGHT, EVERY TIME! And if I’M BAD (as a delinquent criminal moslem) since I got away with it, then it was really ALWAYS a GOOD thing anyway, so no one has any right to attack ME by accusing me of anything, either!

    “I didn’t do it – the allah made me do it!
    In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

    [8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

    This is why these criminals (and their liberal enablers) push for their backwards “anti-Blasphemy” notions that it should be “illegal” to accuse any criminals (moslems) of their crimes, if doing so might hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

    Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

    “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

    -Muhammad-

    Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

    Sura 4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
    “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

    As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

    Criminals believe in idolatrous group-might-made-rights (which is of course only what all criminals pretend to believe in – if they can take your stuff by force, then they have a ‘right’ to it) which automatically deprives all real human citizen individuals of theirs!

    So lying (fraud) is also their favorite tactic, because it’s the most basic form of theft (it’s the theft of the Truth) and theft IS crime! Of course, their first lie is to them selves: “I have a right to your stuff, simply because I have the ability to take it without asking you!”

    Muhammad’s islam pretends that objective, right-and-wrong morality are all false concepts which don’t really exist – because, as moslems, only the big bad scary capricious unknown and unknowable idol of allah is responsible for everything, including both “good” and “bad,” as their main #1 excuse for their crimes!

    Islam is NOT A RELIGION (at all, much less one “of peace”)! It’s ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate!

    The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no ones is every really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims anyway:

    “God told us to commit these crimes! Whee!”

    ;-(

    So, islam’s moslems have NO legal right to “practice their faith” whether it be in public or elsewhere – because everything moslems pretend to hold as “holy” is already a crime.

    ;-(

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *