The Greens want to outlaw “Islamophobia”

“Islamophobia” is an imaginary disease, invented by the MuBros to stifle criticism about Islam. It is an insult to more than four fifths of the worlds population who find Islam revolting.

Nothing and no one can force you to like a genocidal belief system. We do not have an irrational fear of islam. We are not “phobic” and especially not “irrational”. We reject the revulsive ideology of islam. That’s the difference. 

fascists, cowards & morons

Perhaps that headline is misleading – as much as the concept of Islamophobia itself is. I understand in the ACT they want to outlaw criticism of Islam – but graciously extend it to criticism of religion in general.

This is a great leap forward – to the Middle Ages approximately – though the punishment by death or trial by social media resulting in painful death is still a few steps away.

Let me aid the Greens. Why not outlaw criticism of Global Warming / Climate Change. Outlaw criticism of Clinton. Outlaw criticism of the safe school teachings. Outlaw criticism of migration policy – heck – just outlaw dissent with the Greens policies in general, really.

Now, I have a serious proposal for the Greens:

Why not outlaw the teaching of homophobia and the call to violence against those who engage in it.

Why not outlaw the teaching of gender segregation – real, not imagined.

Why not outlaw the teaching that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s?

Why not outlaw the teaching of armed violence against “others” (and heck – explicit teachings about conquering others and denying their religious freedoms) as a guarantee of eternal salvation?

Why not outlaw parallel legal systems which act on a rather retrograde moral and ethical code which is forbidden from “progressing” and is hence stuck in the 7th century?

Why not outlaw teachings of hate towards people who tend to represent your voting base?

I know it makes a lot of sense – and yet you do the opposite? Why not take the time to listen to and study the materials which are at the heart of that which you seek to protect from criticism.

Your actions are disconcertingly illogical. All that can really explain it is the thought that the best way to explain the actions of an institution is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.

Having written that – I can now make sense of your actions. I only hope those who will be punished by your actions – and I do not mean the critics of your real ideological enemy – will wisen up to the disservice that you seek to impose upon their future rights.

Perhaps that headline is misleading – as much as the concept of Islamophobia itself is. I understand in the ACT they want to outlaw criticism of Islam – but graciously extend it to criticism of religion in general. This is a great leap forward – to the…
XYZ.NET.AU|BY KEATING

5 thoughts on “The Greens want to outlaw “Islamophobia””

  1. There is no such thing as Islamophobia.

    It is the right of every individual to question a religion or totalitarian ideology which claims to be peaceful, and yet whose co-religionists or practitioners are responsible for more terror attacks than any other.

    In the Islamic world, women are treated as second class citizens and bound by ancient laws that have no place in a modern world.

    The real problem is that Islam has a phobia about anything not Islamic.

    (adapted from the comments of a free thinker)

  2. I say they should outlaw hearing “Islamophobia” speech. Since Islamophobia simply doesn’t exist, but the Greens are hearing it, it must all be only in their minds, huh? Maybe they’re all schizophrenic.

  3. Sheik: How many political parties has the leftist HYDRA divided itself into there in Oz? I bet they want a “ranked voting” system too, so they can have multiple do-overs until one of theirs wins!

  4. I prefer to call it Islamonausea, the belief system and whining followers sure make me sick.

Comments are closed.