Germany: ‘Allahuakbaring’ Savage Ruins Wedding Day

Frankly, It is a disaster if a people don’t have the resolve to beat a a muselmanic savage to death on the spot when he desecrates their holy sites on their wedding day.

Mohammedan Migrant screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ bursts into a wedding in a German church and tears down decorations
  • Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike married in Duisburg, Germany
  • They were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests at a church
  • A 23-year-old Syrian man appeared at the back of the church 
  • Groom claims he ‘fondled the statue of Mary’ and destroyed flowers 

“After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.”

Because clearly a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” and disrupting a Christian religious service must be insane, right? There couldn’t possibly be any other motive. Jihad? Islamic supremacism? Hatred and contempt for the unbelievers whom the Qur’an designates “the most vile of created beings” (98:6)? Don’t be silly, you greasy Islamophobe! This is just another instance of the global outbreak of mental illness.

“The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’” The poor dear! Good thing they were there to comfort him!

A newlywed couple have claimed their big day was ruined when a man burst inside the church shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and then started tearing down wedding decorations.

Groom Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests in the Karmel Church in Duisburg, a city in western Germany.

Lochbeck said: ‘At the beginning of the ceremony, a man with a thick jumper and a hat on came into the church and sat in the back row.

‘Shortly afterwards, he stood up and wandered around the candles. He laughed in a disturbing manner and then fondled the statue of Mary.

‘He had been speaking in Arabic and partly English. He then started destroying the flowers and kept shouting “Allahu Akbar”.’

Two newlyweds have complained that their wedding day was ruined when a man burst inside the Karmel Church in Duisburg shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (file photo)
Two newlyweds have complained that their wedding day was ruined when a man burst inside the Karmel Church in Duisburg shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ (file photo)

Police officer Ludger A., 57, the uncle of the groom, reportedly tried to intervene along with the church sexton.

The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’

After the man again refused to leave the church, there was a fight in which the police officer got slight injuries to his face.

Yet he managed to restrain the man until his colleagues from the Duisburg police could arrive.

After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3874108/Does-object-marriage-Migrant-screaming-Allahu-Akbar-burts-wedding-German-church-tears-decorations.html#ixzz4ODuQ1cGx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

11 thoughts on “Germany: ‘Allahuakbaring’ Savage Ruins Wedding Day”

  1. There were something like 90 people at the wedding? Maybe about half of the adults were men? Just for guessing’s sake, let’s say there were 30 men there. Now, what is the problem with this story? No, not the moslem part, the other part.

    1. “Muslims are people”.

      Yes. But who are the “fringe?” Are the jihadists the fringe, or the da’awa gigolos, or those who are islamic in name only?

      And who, according to islamic scriptures, pray tell, are the Muslims ‘fellow man?’

      What does the Qur’an say about the disbelievers, and how do the Muslims see them?

      Are they not ‘the vilest of creatures?’

      The vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve. (8.55)

      And again, what does the Qur’an say about befriending disbelievers?

    2. WTF???

      Hitler was a person. So was Stalin.

      Nazis are people too.

      So were Ghengis Khan’s hordes.

      So are ISIS.

      Come up with a cogent argument instead of that idiotic but deceptive ruse you’re trying to use on people who can clearly discern the outcomes of islam..

      1. I think you know what I mean. You’re just playing dumb.

        Hold individuals responsible for their own actions, not those of people with whom they share a demographic. You know, the old personal responsibility and merit thing.

        This isn’t complicated except when people are searching for an excuse to hate a lot of people.

        If I posted stories all day long about bad things that people named James had done around the world, you’d end up hating everyone named James.

        But we don’t do that. Every person named James is only held accountable for his own aciotns.

        Treating people as human beings. It’s not a hard concept. concept.

        http://grovesofspears.blogspot.com/

        1. People named James don’t do bad things because there is a set of writings urging people named James to do bad things. OTOH Muslims revere a man who did bad things and hold his behaviors as exemplars to be followed for all time by everyone, because that man told people that God had told him that he was the perfect example.

          Most systems of ethical thought, laws and religions contain teachings and rewards for good behaviors and sanctions for bad behaviors, putting an intellectual break upon emotional urges to behave badly. Islam allows and encourages such behaviors when directed against non-innocent people, i.e. those who have not submitted to Islam.

          Or to put it another way this perp didn’t run into the wedding ceremony and yell ‘Grooms named James are the best’ but yelled ‘my god is greater than your god’.

          If this was about hating people it is the quisling dhimmi traitors in the media and political classes who are hated, not some pathetic brainwashed Syrian. However it is not about hating people but about hating an ideology which promotes hate of people, and based on whether or not they belong to the tribe.

        2. “…If I posted stories all day long about bad things that people named James had done around the world, you’d end up hating everyone named James. ..”

          Is that the extent of your logic? Really? How about taking it a step further? Instead of throwing your arms up in the air and saying that James’s activities are allah’s will and we can’t do anything about it – perhaps suggest we look into the reasons why all the James were doing bad things. And what if you found a common link? Say, a little green book of arabian ignorance which gives licence to or actually promotes such activities? Though it is understandable that if you yourself actually followed the recommendations in such a book which suited you – it would be a bit of a stretch for anyone to expect you to criticise this source of ‘inspiration’. You’d be more incline to play down the activities of all the James’s – telling people that the James’s are misunderstanding what they read, not like all the true understanders such as yourself.

          “This isn’t complicated except when people are searching for an excuse to hate a lot of people.”
          Why do you think that people who oppose the spread of your cult’s ridiculous beliefs necessarily hate muslims? Is your world a somewhat binary place ? dar al harb, dar al Islam? Non-muslim, muslim. Sharia, laws of the infidels. Hate, love?

          “Every person named James is only held accountable for his own aciotns.”
          Each individual James and the group of James’s as a whole, is responsible. As are all the people that aid and abet the mindset that the James’s follow and do nothing about curtailing the James’s actions.

          “Treating people as human beings. It’s not a hard concept. concept.

          That’s a truism put in a somewhat patronising way. How about you throw in ‘stop treating people as idiots?

          People who do not feel the need to evaluate or base their lives around 7th century arabian desert fables and for all practical purposes worship a long dead bedouin child molester , do not need to be lectured to by those who do.

    3. Muslims are people.”
      In biological shape …
      but the islam infection of the brain/mind separates them from Human Civilisation (people) !

      Purge everything islam … Globally !

      (There can Never be enough fitnah … ever !)
      Fitnah is the Qur’anic word for what has been dubbed Islamophobia in the REAL non-Islamic world.

  2. No mention by the cops of the bride being traumatised by her big day being ruined, just the poor Syrian.

    I didn’t mention the groom here for reasons associated with the point from Pray Hard.

  3. Swishy fickle and fey Euro-trash.

    If only the muzis burnt down their schools – which indoctrinate them with suicidal masochism as a virtue – they’d be doing them a favour!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *