Those Self-Appointed “Anti-Racist” Crusaders

Everyone & everything is “racist”
Migrants who say they’re hell bent on escaping ‘racist’ France for UK
Some 6,000 migrants were dispersed when the Calais Jungle was demolished.…
The New Anti-Racist Racists

by Douglas Murray

  • There is a trait campaigning groups have that is well known. Once they have achieved their objective, they continue. Usually it is because there are people with salaries at stake, pensions, perks and more.
  • Suddenly the SPLC seemed to spy a new fascism. The SPLC saw this new fascism in people who objected to people flying planes into skyscrapers, decapitating journalists and aid workers and blowing up the finish line of marathons.
  • One got the impression that it had become immensely useful for some people to be able to smear those concerned about Islamic fundamentalism, and try to make them akin to Nazis. The only other movements who find this equally useful are, of course, Islamic extremists.
  • Here is this “anti-racist” organisation, largely made up of white men who present themselves as being anti-racists, and yet who spend their time attacking Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a black immigrant woman. At the top of any list of “hate-groups,” the SPLC must in future be sure to place itself.
  • The SPLC’s list of “anti-Muslim activists” also includes a practising Muslim, Maajid Nawaz, one of the most principled and courageous people around calling out the extremists in his faith for their bigotry and hatred. He does so, like Hirsi Ali, at no small risk to himself.
The Southern Poverty Law Center decided to turn itself into a racist organization, with its attacks on principled and courageous critics of radical Islamism such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali (left), a prominent ex-Muslim writer, and Maajid Nawaz (right), a moderate practising Muslim writer, radio host and politician. (Images source: Wikimedia Commons)

Muslim Imperialism Reaches the United Nations

by Denis MacEoin

UNESCO has joined forces with Islamic State. The fundamentalists now have a new weapon: resolutions passed by servile international bodies.

    • An earlier delay and the opposition of UNESCO’s chief, Irina Bokova, had raised hopes that this act of jihadist, barbaric, unjust, and, frankly, arrogant supremacism might be voted down. It was not. Now a new lie was given the sanction of the world’s largest and most unaccountable body whose reason for being is to preserve significant sites, not to bowdlerize them.
    • Lies by UNESCO to rewrite history, erasing all traces of Judaism and Christianity to favour a jihadist Islamic fancy, were already under way in 2015. UNESCO fraudulently renamed two ancient Biblical Jewish sites, Rachel’s Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs, as Islamic sites. Historically, Islam did not even exist until the seventh century.
    • This is the history of Islam, how it takes over — with both hard jihad (violence) and soft jihad (usurping history, migration [hijrah], political and cultural infiltration), and intimidation (soft jihad with the threat of hard jihad underneath it). What is even more saddening is that often, as with this vote, it is done with the West’s cooperation and voluntary submission.
    • Before the United Nations, with its authoritarian, anti-democratic voting blocs, finishes eradicating Western, Judeo-Christian civilization, as it is clearly trying to do, it is high time for Western democracies to run, not walk, away, before further harm comes to them too, as it surely promises to do.

    UNESCO last August planned to vote on the historical status of Jerusalem’s Temple Mount and its associated Western Wall. Back then, this author stated that UNESCO’s plan was to deny any Jewish link to this most central of all Jewish holy sites, to trash a history going back thousands of years, and to claim the Mount and the Wall as Islamic sites.

    Islam believes that it is eternal and had therefore preceded the other two great monotheisms, Judaism and Christianity, even though it was only to become visible to the world through Mohammad in the seventh century AD, but entitled to elbow out the two older religions.

    Lies by UNESCO to rewrite history, erasing all traces of Judaism and Christianity to favour a jihadist Islamic fancy, were already under way in 2015. UNESCO fraudulently renamed two ancient Biblical Jewish sites, Rachel’s Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs — abracadabra — Islamic sites.

    Historically, Islam did not even exist until the seventh century.

    This is the history of Islam, how it takes over — with both hard jihad (violence) and soft jihad (usurping history, migration [hijrah], political and cultural infiltration), and intimidation (soft jihad with the threat of hard jihad underneath it). What is even more saddening is that often, as with this vote, it is done with the West’s cooperation and voluntary submission.

    The Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron is now, according to this deeply compromised body, supposedly the “Ibrahimi Mosque,” and Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem is supposedly the “Bilal ibn Rabah Mosque,” even though it never could have been a mosque. As the saying goes, “calling a cat a pig does not make it one.”

UNESCO’s latest resolution to deny any Jewish link to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, the most central of all Jewish holy sites, is not the first time the body has tried to rewrite and falsify a history going back thousands of years. UNESCO had previously declared the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron (left) as the “Ibrahimi Mosque,” and Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem (right) as the “Bilal ibn Rabah Mosque.” (Images source: Wikimedia Commons)

Continue reading Muslim Imperialism Reaches the United Nations

Paul Weston & Pat Condell

America’s Moment Of Truth by Pat Condell

 

Polish Patriots Invite the French and Other Europeans to Their Independence Day Rally

by 

Every year on November 11 the Poles celebrate their independence day with a huge march and rally on the streets of Warsaw. This year they are inviting patriots from other European countries to join them to celebrate the free and independent nation-states of Europe.

The following video specifically invites the French to Polish Independence Day. Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

Continue reading 

Afghan welfare seekers complain: no halal meat, French care more for cows than for migrants

Nothing in the French constitution says French citizens have to feed Mohammedan welfare seekers or provide them with halal food.  The French have every right to reject the Mohammedan hordes that their irresponsible gov’t dumps on the countryside:

‘There’s no halal meat’ Migrants brand France “racist” and say they want to come to Britain

MIGRANTS recently evicted from the Calais Jungle have branded France racist and says they will do anything to come to Britain.

Calais migrant FranceGETTY

Migrants have branded France racist and say they want to come to Britain

The migrants claim they were hoodwinked by French authorities, who told them they would be given a “big house in a big city”, but found themselves holed-up in a dirty former children’s home in rural Normandy with no halal meat in sight.Before they arrived, locals dumped manure outside their soon-to-be-home and lit a bonfire by way of protest.Rahmat Ahmadi, 18, says conditions are so bad that many migrants are looking to escape in a bid to find their own way across the Channel.

Rahmat said: “They lied to us migrants.

“They promised we would go from the Jungle to a big house in a city. But they dumped us here in a place with no halal meat in the meals, no internet, and where we sleep ten to a bedroom and the kitchen is covered in flies.

“The cows over the fence are better cared for than us. We were tricked and we are going to walk out.

Continue reading Afghan welfare seekers complain: no halal meat, French care more for cows than for migrants

Bosnia-Herzegovina: Arab Muslims Only!

Town in the heart of Europe where ONLY Arabic can be spoken and Arabs can live

“The owners do not want to mix with local population”–Local Estate Agent

PROTESTS are taking place in a town in Bosnia-Herzegovina because only Arabs are allowed and most of the houses contain the third or fourth wives of wealthy sheikhs.

Locals are fuming because they are are only allowed into the site in the south-eastern Europe country if they are servants or cleaners.

The complex is surrounded by heavy security, gates and high walls and the locals think it is unlawful for foreigners to buy up part of the country and then ban them from entering.

Women reportedly bring up their children there and their husbands are just occasional visitors.

Bosnia housing site CEN

Locals are furious they can’t access the site 

The Resort CEN

The resort is five miles from Sarajevo

Continue reading Bosnia-Herzegovina: Arab Muslims Only!

Australia’s Poisonous Wahhabi Aly

Waleed Aly writes for the New York Times to shit-can Australia

Images (2)
Australia’s Poisonous Wahhabi Aly

.
Australia doesn’t execute people Muslims for not being like us.  Islam does.  As a paid Islamist PR you’d reckon Waleed Aly might open up a bit about that central tenet of the system he pushes.

We couldn’t give a rat’s about other people’s religion as long as they don’t want to hurt us.

And we don’t decide who’s in or kept out of our country on race, gender, sexual orientation or how they say their prayers.

In our democracy what goes on here is what we the people of Australia want to go on here.    Not Muhammad.   Not Buddha.  And certainly not the views of Sunni Islam’s head office, Saudi Arabia spouted through slick PRs like Waleed Aly.

We don’t like it when people get killed because of something we did.

We are revolted when it’s children who have no say in getting on board leaky boats only to drown at sea while en route to claim a prize for mum and dad.

We’re more Hippocrates than Muhammad.  First do no harm.  We want to know a bit about who’s coming here and their intentions.  We don’t want them dead on arrival.  And self-selection or queue-jumping isn’t on.

Residency or citizenship in Australia is a glittering prize.  Many want it.   Let it rip and ruthless people smugglers will quickly fill the leaky boats again.  That’s what happenned last time Wahabbi Aly’s preferred system was running.  And thousands drowned.

Australians could see that our system was killing people.  Mohameddan fatalist culture might cop that sweet as the will of a vengeful creator.   But just like we do in most things – or overdo at work – it’s Safety First here and decent Australians won’t be a party to industrial scale killing.

I won’t cop two-faced criticism of our caring culture from a paid promoter of its opposite.   The least worst option is the stable one we have now.

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s strong border protection and denial of the prize of residency to those who try to buck our system by arriving illegally by boat is working.   Lives are being saved.

We can’t offer refuge to everyone on earth from those who’d attack or persecute them.   But we can manage Australia and remove further unacceptable temptations and risks to life from our system.

Michael P. Smith is an Australian with a website and unfunded opinions.

Here’s the pretend proud Australian Waleed Aly using the pages of the New York Times to attack Australia and most of our population:

Read it and weep!

Continue reading Australia’s Poisonous Wahhabi Aly

Hugh Fitzgerald: “Meet Your Muslim Neighbors”

adil-najam

Ever since 9/11, mosques and “Islamic centers” have been conducting campaigns of determined “outreach” to non-Muslims. The point of this “outreach” is to present Islam as the least threatening of faiths, one which has been too often misunderstood and its adherents unfairly maligned, and those adherents are only too glad to clear up misconceptions about their faith. One such gathering was held on September 16 at the Islamic Center of Boston in Wayland, Massachusetts, billed as “Meet Your Muslim Neighbors.”

The first “misconception” that the Muslim hosts thought needed to be cleared up had to do with how long Muslims have been in America. “People think that Muslims have just come here to this country,” said Shaheen Akhtar, who is an “interfaith liaison” and runs an “interfaith book club” at the Center. She told her audience that Jefferson and John Adams had both owned copies of the Qur’an. Her implication was clear: these men took a sympathetic interest in Islam. She even described Jefferson as “advocating for the rights of the practitioners of the faith.” This implies special pleading on his part for Islam. What Jefferson actually did was “advocate” for the principle of religious freedom in general, and famously quoted a line from John Locke’s 1698 A Letter Concerning Religious Toleration: “neither Pagan nor Mahamedan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.”

However, there were those whom Locke expressly excluded from toleration, and applying his own criteria, Muslims might well have been among them.

At the website of Apologetics Press:

Dr. Dave Miller has noted that in a section of A Letter Concerning Toleration dealing with those whom a civil magistrate “cannot” tolerate, Locke lists the following (page numbers refer to the 1796 edition of Locke’s Letter):Those whose religious opinions are contrary to “those moral rules which are necessary to the preservation of civil society” (1796, p. 53);

  1. The religion that “teaches expressly and openly, that men are not obliged to keep their promise” (p. 54);
  2. “[T]hose that will not own and teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of mere religion…and that they only ask leave to be tolerated by the magistrate so long, until they find themselves strong enough to [seize the government]” (p. 55);
  3. All those who see themselves as having allegiance to another civil authority (p. 56). Specifically, Locke gives the example of the Muslim who lives among Christians and would have difficulty submitting to the government of a “Christian nation” when he comes from a Muslim country where the civil magistrate was also the religious authority. Locke notes that such a person would have grave difficulty serving as a soldier in his adopted nation (cf. the 2009 Fort Hood shooting spree by a Muslim soldier who shouted, “Allahu Akbar” as he opened fire, killing 13 and wounding 32; see Stewart, 2010).
  4. “[T]hose are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God” (p. 56).

#1-#4 would all seem to disqualify Islam from such toleration.

But what did those visitors to the Islamic Center know about Jefferson’s reliance on Locke, and Locke’s criteria, that would have excluded Islam from “toleration”? And what did they know about, what could they reasonably conclude, from the Qur’ans owned by Jefferson and Adams?

Continue reading Hugh Fitzgerald: “Meet Your Muslim Neighbors”

Germany: ‘Allahuakbaring’ Savage Ruins Wedding Day

Frankly, It is a disaster if a people don’t have the resolve to beat a a muselmanic savage to death on the spot when he desecrates their holy sites on their wedding day.

Mohammedan Migrant screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ bursts into a wedding in a German church and tears down decorations
  • Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike married in Duisburg, Germany
  • They were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests at a church
  • A 23-year-old Syrian man appeared at the back of the church 
  • Groom claims he ‘fondled the statue of Mary’ and destroyed flowers 

“After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.”

Because clearly a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” and disrupting a Christian religious service must be insane, right? There couldn’t possibly be any other motive. Jihad? Islamic supremacism? Hatred and contempt for the unbelievers whom the Qur’an designates “the most vile of created beings” (98:6)? Don’t be silly, you greasy Islamophobe! This is just another instance of the global outbreak of mental illness.

“The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’” The poor dear! Good thing they were there to comfort him!

A newlywed couple have claimed their big day was ruined when a man burst inside the church shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and then started tearing down wedding decorations.

Groom Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests in the Karmel Church in Duisburg, a city in western Germany.

Lochbeck said: ‘At the beginning of the ceremony, a man with a thick jumper and a hat on came into the church and sat in the back row.

‘Shortly afterwards, he stood up and wandered around the candles. He laughed in a disturbing manner and then fondled the statue of Mary.

‘He had been speaking in Arabic and partly English. He then started destroying the flowers and kept shouting “Allahu Akbar”.’

Two newlyweds have complained that their wedding day was ruined when a man burst inside the Karmel Church in Duisburg shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (file photo)
Two newlyweds have complained that their wedding day was ruined when a man burst inside the Karmel Church in Duisburg shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ (file photo)

Police officer Ludger A., 57, the uncle of the groom, reportedly tried to intervene along with the church sexton.

The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’

After the man again refused to leave the church, there was a fight in which the police officer got slight injuries to his face.

Yet he managed to restrain the man until his colleagues from the Duisburg police could arrive.

After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3874108/Does-object-marriage-Migrant-screaming-Allahu-Akbar-burts-wedding-German-church-tears-decorations.html#ixzz4ODuQ1cGx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

The government of Gambia accuses Europeans of “genocide” of migrants on Europe’s shores.

Gambians also declared it amounts to “persecution and humiliation” of Africans.

You couldn’t make it up. No one asked them to come. Since when do failed African states have an entitlement to ship their surplus humanity to Europe?

“Thousands of young Africans in search of greener pastures have been dying on European coasts on weekly basis,” Bojang said. “For what crime – because they are black?”

.
“We depend on almighty Allah and Allah-willing all the racist, genocidal criminals responsible for the continuing mass slaughter of Africans will face justice,” he added.

Gambia pulls out of International Criminal Court, citing hypocrisy
The government of Gambia has declared it is leaving the International Criminal Court, accusing it of “persecution and humiliation” of Africans.  | News | DW.COM | 26.10.2016
escape-capitalism
Update:
.
What kind of ‘genocide’ is this?

Last year 1 million illegal immigrants from the Third World invaded Europe.

The number now is lower than that extraordinary high, but still so high that Europe will pay.

The International Organisation for Migration said 318,816 migrants and refugees entered Europe by sea in the year to October 16. The number of deaths recorded by the group (3,649) over the period is 532 more compared with the same time last year.

Austria:”Hate-speech” terror against those who oppose Islamisation

Editor of Austria’s Largest Paper Charged with ‘Hate Speech’ over Migrant Article

hate

Kronen Zeitung/Krone.at

An editor of Austria’s largest paper, Kronen Zeitung, is to be tried for hate speech over a commentary he wrote about the migrant crisis last year.

On 25 October 2015, Christoph Biro wrote of the masses of migrants who were travelling through the Styrian countryside and remarked on the assaults and property damage committed by migrants, reports Kurier.

Calling the majority of the migrants “testosterone-driven Syrians”, Mr. Biro recounted the multiple reports of migrants carrying out, in his words, “extremely aggressive sexual assaults”.

He also detailed Afghan men had slashed the seats of the trains that were transporting them to Germany because they refused to sit where Christians had previously sat.

In other news:

UK to Take Hundreds More ‘Child’ Migrants After French Pressure

Labour MP Freaks Out over Joke Poster Depicting Elderly ‘Child Migrant’

Labour MP Freaks Out over Joke Poster Depicting Elderly ‘Child Migrant’

The commentary provoked a negative reaction at the time with 37 complaints lodged against Mr. Biro. He took four weeks off from his position at the time, claiming that he had lost perspective and proportion of the situation.