“Europe on ‘BRINK OF WAR’ as Turkey gathers boats to ship migrants to Greece over EU anger,”
Charlie Hebdo’s surrender is not a new development. After jihadis opened fire on our free speech event in Garland, Texas in May 2015, Charlie Hebdo staffers attacked us, not the jihadis. Charlie Hebdo editor-in-chief Gérard Biard rejected any comparison between our event and Charlie Hebdo’s Muhammad cartoons: “The difference between us and these people is that these people are organizing contests, anti-Islamist contests. It’s an obsession … We are not obsessed. We are just obsessed by the news, and by how the world is going on. The difference with Pamela Geller, she is obsessed by Islam. She waits [sic] every morning and thinks, What can I do today to defy these people?”
That was bad enough, but it could be dismissed as the typical Leftist fear of being associated with anything described, however inaccurately, as “right-wing”: indeed, it was absurd to think there was any difference between what they did and what we did. Both of us drew Muhammad to defy violent intimidation; there is no “right-wing” and “left-wing” defiance of violent intimidation, it is the same motion.
But now Charlie Hebdo has not just surrendered; it has switched sides and become part of the problem: “Take Charlie’s recent covers. Against terrorists? No. Against those who called them “racists”? No. It was against Éric Zemmour, the brave French journalist at Le Figaro who has led a public debate about French identity. ‘Islam is incompatible with secularism, incompatible with democracy, and incompatible with republican government,’ Zemmour wrote. Laurent Sourisseau, aka “Riss,” now the publishing director and majority owner of Charlie, was shot during the 2015 attack on the magazine, and lives under police protection. He depicted Zemmour on the cover with an explosive vest, effectively comparing him to a terrorist. Charlie Hebdo also recently satirized Nadine Morano, a critic of Islam, depicting her as a baby with Down Syndrome. Riss also recently published a comic book attacking another easy target of submissive conformists, entitled ‘The Dark Side of Marine Le Pen.’ Le Pen leads France’s National Front party, with a platform fighting for national sovereignty and Europe’s Judeo-Christian identity. In Charlie, the political leader of the French ‘right’ is dressed as Marilyn Monroe.”
In Garland, jihadis tried to murder those of us who were standing for the freedom of speech, but they failed; in Paris, they succeeded. I can understand how that difference can change one’s perspective. Nonetheless, I can only hope, no matter what happens in the future, that on none of the days I have left will I surrender and grovel, and shy bricks at those who are still fighting the fight, as Charlie Hebdo is doing, rather than stand for what is right.
“Islamists Won: Charlie Hebdo Disappears,” by Giulio Meotti, Gatestone Institute, November 30, 2016:
Sounds like these “refugee workers” are totally in the bag for the Mohammedan enrichment. On top of that the Merkel gubmint employs a “flirt-coach” who teaches Mohammedan rapefugees how to hook up with German women.
This shouldn’t surprise anyone, and many more will be found as well. This is because few things are more abundantly attested in Islamic law than the permissibility of child marriage. Islamic tradition records that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.
Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:
The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.
Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”
According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.
“Child brides discovered in Germany – but refugee workers say marriages should REMAIN,” by Jon Rogers, Express, November 26, 2016:
Perhaps there is more to it than stupid. Considering that the Caliphate News Network is heavily infested with Muselmaniacs, could it be that Alisyn Camerota is bonking one of them?
Where is Alisyn Camerota’s concern for Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill herand harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?
Who is standing in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?
(Thanks to Pamela Geller for the video.)
Everywhere in the world, the jihad rages on. Here in Australia, our political clown-gallery is like a dear in the headlights when it comes to Islam.
HE WISELY WAITED UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION
… but the Don won anyway
It is of no consequence that his name was Abdul Razak Ali Artan and it doesn’t matter that he was a refugee from Somalia. And of course the fact that he had driven into a crowd of infidels before taking to eleven of them with a butcher’s knife just happened to be an instruction straight out of the ISIS handbook… it still wasn’t enough for authorities to declare this a terrorist attack, much less an Islamic terrorist attack, before they viewed his suicide notes (above). Presumably, Obama is still President!
Muslim, Buddhist or Christian… the real threat is Islam itself and what is required of a devotee of the cult. Each and every attack since (and including) 9/11 was by people who would never be suspected of unpaid parking tickets, let alone the killing of thousands, and that’s what makes Islam so dangerous.
Unfortunately the rhetoric that protects Muslims will remain until the 20th of January when Trump takes over and a new approach to Islam will catch up with Europe’s hard-learned lessons.
Obama’s cowardly refusal to face and deal with any damned problem will be his only legacy. Turnbull will follow him into historical oblivion as he too refuses to face and deal with our Western Sydney Muslims and Sudanese refugees rampaging through Melbourne.
The Left has infiltrated our Security Agencies over many years and they are demanding that we don’t blame Muslims and that Islam is an honourable faith. And you think Donald Trump has a lot of cleaning up to do? Australia’s Green Left has remained unchallenged while it infects every corner of Aussie society, and we are sans a Donald to fix it.
Where is Australia’s rebirth of sanity? Where is our Wilders, where is our Le Pen? There isn’t one. Those who see Pauline Hanson as a saviour will need to wait for another decade or two, she is leader of a micro party in the Senate, and micro parties are not known for their longevity, even in the Reps. Not even the Nats, as Coalition partners, are known for their bush bravery.
Australia is in danger of being left behind with the plasticine Turnbull and a UN besotted stick insect to lead us. Both have resolved to leave the centre-right Abbott sniping away on the back bench. They have learned nothing from the disastrous Gillard experiment with Rudd.
Our craven Conservatives, under fire, have fled to the Left hopping into bed with Shorten while he pretends to have gone off sex and starts domestic arguments over nothing. So, who the hell do we vote for? Shorten’s out, Turnbull’s out and Pauline’s confined to the obstructionist Senate.
Basically we are rooned, destined to drown in the wake of a reparative Trump tsunami with no-one in sight to deal with our Islamic terrorism or the UN’s massive global warming hoax which is designed to bash energy dependent nations into submission and allow Islamic OPEC to call the tune… which they are already doing.
All roads to destruction can be traced back to the UN where it planned a new world order as the defunct League of Nations. So what hope do we have with the stick insect photocopying Gillard’s infatuation with a UN seat where she can relax holding hands with her sleepy Mr Wonderful?
And Mr Turnbull? Well, while the rest of the sane world was lauding Trump’s win, he was emulating Gillard, snapping selfies and playing touchy feelies with Obama.
And Abbott? Well, if he was to be reinstated, which he won’t be, the main players and their roles would all still be the same. Abbott has suffered fiscal deprivation on the back bench and only a front bench Ministry can remedy that.
“No vacancy”, eh? Turnbull’s ridiculous appointment of Senator Marise Payne to Defence eventually had to be augmented with a novel “dual Ministry” that includes the 60 billion dollar submarine man from South Australia, Christopher Pyne! Neither is capable of the monstrously unwieldy Defence portfolio, whereas Abbott would be ideal.
Turnbull’s Australia runs last again!
But isn’t it nice that Abdul Razak Ali Artan held off his Islamic terrorism until after the Presidential election. I mean, any terrorist activity during the hustings would no doubt have assisted Trump and hurt Clinton, but the Don won anyway.
Yet it does make you wonder just what lovable links flourish between Islam and the Left.
The degenerati spring into action:
Here it is, fellas. The Islamic State issued this call in September 2014:
So O muwahhid, do not let this battle pass you by wherever you may be. You must strike the soldiers, patrons, and troops of the tawaghit. Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be….If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies. Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him….
Artan had a real issue with his university’s lack of Islamic prayer rooms, and the terribly unfair media:
Guys, it’s only the media putting bad thoughts in your head about Abdul Artan. He even says so.
The Somali terrorist, Abdul Razak Artan, was a peaceful Muslim “wrongly portrayed by the media”– Americans need to understand Somali culture. Stabbing someone is a sign of acceptance and friendship. Tweet #IllStabWithYou to show solidarity with the Somali community!
Somali refugee ranted about how he was ‘sick and tired of seeing my fellow Muslim brothers being killed and tortured’ on social media hours before wounding 11 in Ohio State knife and car attack
Nutroots and other self hating leftoids will buy this BS-argument and swallow it, hook, line and sinker.
Somali refugee Abdul Razak Ali Artan posted on Facebook that he was ‘sick and tired of seeing my fellow Muslim brothers being killed and tortured’ shortly before he went on a slashing rampage at the Ohio State University that left 11 injured.
Authorities are currently investigating the posts, allegedly made by Artan, which mention radical cleric Anwar Awlaki and accuse America of ‘interfering’ with other nations.
‘I am sick and tired of seeing my fellow Muslim brothers and sisters being killed and tortured EVERYWHERE,’ it stated. ‘I can’t take it anymore.
‘America! Stop interfering with other countries, especially Muslim Ummah (communities)… [if] you want us Muslims to stop carrying lone wolf attacks.’
‘We are not weak, remember that,’ the post said, according to NBC News.
Two hours before that, another post read: ‘Forgive and forget. Love.’
Artan left at least 11 injured – one critically – after he drove onto the sidewalk at the university on Monday, mowing down crowds of innocent bystanders, witnesses say.
He then jumped out of the car and began slashing victims with a butcher knife, according to police.
While the motive for the attack is still under investigation, there are questions about whether Artan, who was Muslim, may have carried it out in the name of jihad.
Wonderful. Now we have a complete list of Jew-hating, Pali-terrorist loving shiites in our gov’t that need to be kicked out of office asap. Spread it wide and far!
The ANTI ISRAEL CRUSADE HAS BEEN STARTED BY AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS:
49 Federal politicians signed a petition urging the end of Israel’s ill-treatment of Palestinian children in the military detention system. The politicians in question are Senators and MPs, primarily from the ALP and the Greens, but also a few from the Nick Xenophon Team, and Andrew Wilkie.
In the halls of Australian power, support for one of the world’s most oppressed people remains small, but is growing, writes Michael Brull.
On 28 November, 49 Federal politicians signed a petition urging the end of Israel’s ill-treatment of Palestinian children in the military detention system. The politicians in question are Senators and MPs, primarily from the ALP and the Greens, but also a few from the Nick Xenophon Team, and Andrew Wilkie.
No Coalition MPs or Senators signed the petition.
The petition makes several demands. It calls “for urgent action to end the ill-treatment of Palestinian children in the Israeli military detention system.” It concludes by calling “on the Israeli Government to comply with its obligations under the Convention on the rights of the child and to not arrest or detain Palestinian children unless this is a last resort, and if they are detained, to immediately institute protections for those children including that their safety and best interests are prioritised, and that they are permitted a fair trial.”
In effect, this call is symbolic. A minority of Australian progressive politicians signing a petition is unlikely to force the Israeli government to change long-standing policy. The primary effect, and interest of the petition is in drawing attention to certain issues.
The petition lays out their concerns:
“Israel is the only country in the world that automatically prosecutes children in military courts. And only Palestinian children. Up to 700 Palestinian children are arrested each year by the Israeli military, and this number is increasing. UNICEF reports that ill-treatment of Palestinian children is “widespread, systematic, and institutionalized throughout the process”. Children as young as 11 are detained by the military. According to well documented research, almost all children have no parent or legal counsel during interrogation; 75% report physical violence; a quarter are made to sign documentation in Hebrew, a language they do not understand; 60% are transferred into prisons in Israel meaning family usually cannot visit. Military courts have a 99% conviction rate for Palestinian defendants.”
It doesn’t mention the occupation. It doesn’t mention ill-treatment of adult prisoners. It doesn’t even refer to the West Bank. In effect, it floats without context. It damns Israel for the issue it draws attention to, without identifying the problem as either anomalous or symptomatic.– – New Matilda
Douglas Murry writing for the Gatestone Institute:
So farewell, then, Anjem Choudary. For two and half years at least. On September 6, the radical cleric was sentenced by a British judge to five and a half years in prison for encouraging people to join the Islamic State. If he behaves himself in prison he could be out in half that time, although whenever he emerges, it is unlikely that it will be as a reformed character. But the law has taken its course and in a rule-bound society has responded in the way that a rule-bound society ought to behave — by the following due process. So it is useful to compare the experience of Anjem Choudary and the way in which the state has responded to him with the way in which it has responded to another person.
SUKKUR: The secretary-general of Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan (JUP) – Noorani, Shah Ovais Noorani, has said that his party will not accept the recently adopted bill banning forced conversion because it is ‘against the spirit of Islam’. The bill, the first of its kind in Pakistan, was passed in the Sindh Assembly recently to promote religious freedom and protect the rights of minorities.
Addressing a press conference at Jamia Ghousia in Sukkur on Sunday, he said that any non-Muslim child who can differentiate between good and bad can embrace the religion of their choice, referring to a clause in the law that says conversions undertaken before the age of 18 will not be recognised. This clause has been added to safeguard the rights of children and prevent forcible conversions.
“Many Syeds and Pirs are sitting in the Sindh Assembly and I am confused how they have adopted such a bill,” wondered Noorani, who claimed he had contacted other religious parties to ‘carve out a strategy against the bill’. There are no representatives of the JUP in the Sindh Assembly.
Talking about the appointment of the new chief of army staff (COAS), Noorani said the whole nation is praying for the success of the new COAS and is ready to support him. He paid tribute to outgoing army chief Raheel Sharif and said he served with utmost professionalism and dignity. “Clash between different institutions is not good for national interest,” said the JUP leader. “The new COAS has to face many challenges, including successful completion of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), increasing violations by India on the Line of Control, working boundary and others.”
He attributed stability in country’s economy to CPEC, which according to him, on completion will open avenues for jobless youth throughout the country. Besides this, he said the Gwadar Port will also prove a game-changer for Pakistanis, especially unemployed youth in Balochistan.
According to Noorani, the wrong policies of former military dictators Gen Ziaul Haq and Gen (Retd) Pervez Musharraf have caused considerable damage to the country. “Pakistan Peoples Party’s democratic government completed its tenure and the Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz government, too, will complete its tenure,” he added. “This is good for democracy and democratic institutions.”
It is ironic that the Council of Islamic Ideology is not given importance and instead parliament is passing many bills to fulfil the agenda of the West, he said. “Pakistan was created in the name of Islam and therefore any un-Islamic law will not be tolerated,” he warned.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 28th, 2016.
You’re not supposed to know that.
The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission (ACNC) has booted the Islamic Development Organisation, known as I-DO, off its official register so it can no longer claim tax breaks.
The ACNC will also audit the powerful Australian Federation of Islamic Councils (AFIC) — which controls six Muslim schools and administers the lucrative Halal certification scheme for Islam-approved food.
The ACNC said it was concerned that AFIC “may not have been operating as a not-for-profit entity’’.
The federal government threatened to axe $41 million in education grants to AFIC-controlled schools this year after a Deloitte audit found taxpayer funds had been funnelled into AFIC.
The biggest — Malek Fahd Islamic School in Sydney — was stripped of $20 million in funding but is appealing the decision.
Funding was reinstated to schools in Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide after they agreed to “ensuring appropriate independence’’ from AFIC, which still lists them on its website.
AFIC’s most recent financial report shows it charged the schools $4.1m in rent plus $223,945 in administration fees and $240,000 in accounting fees last year. The Muslim charity also pocketed $794,263 in Halal certification fees and $126,446 in “supervision fees’’ to ensure animals are slaughtered facing Mecca.
AFIC’s new president Keysar Trad, who once worked for the Tax Office, said AFIC was co-operating with the charity regulator to fix issues of “poor governance’’.
“We’re cleaning up everything,’’ he said. “We want to make sure the federation is one of the cleanest and most transparent organisations in Australia.”
Never. They will continue to deceive the kafirs until we shut them down.
In other news:
Two teachers banned from teaching after being named as ringleaders in the ‘Trojan horse’ education scandal have returned to the classroom. Tahir Alam and Razwan Faraz were part of the ‘Park View Brotherhood’ of teachers, which exchanged some 3,000 messages in a WhatsApp group, including offensive comments about British soldiers, the Boston Marathon bombings and the murder of soldier Lee Rigby.