Why would you take a case to court if you don’t accept the authority of that court?

Something – could be a person – leaves court yesterday
Something – could be a person – leaves court yesterday
COURTROOM CAPERS CONTINUE

Moutia Elzahed says she “won’t stand for anyone except Allah”. District Judge Audrey Balla won’t stand for Elzahed’s grandstanding.

The story so far: Moutia Elzahed is suing NSW police over a 2014 raid of her home, but won’t give evidence on her own behalf unless she’s allowed to wear a bag on her head.

Now she faces a potential $1100 fine every time she refuses to stand for the judge hearing her case:

District Judge Audrey Balla told her yesterday that it was an offence under new “disrespectful behaviour” laws introduced in response to other radical Muslims thumbing their noses at NSW courts …

Judge Balla challenged Ms Elzahed for not standing each time she entered and left the bench.

“I noticed on Wednesday and today the first plaintiff doesn’t stand as I come to and leave the bench. Is there a reason?” she asked.

“It is to do with a religious belief your Honour,” Ms Elzahed’s barrister Clive Evatt said.

Mr Evatt asked to be excused so he could take instructions before telling Judge Balla: “According to my instructions she won’t stand for anyone except Allah, which I am not particularly happy with.”

Judge Balla asked Mr Evatt if he had told his client about the law which made it an offence not to stand in court and warned that the ­decision to charge Ms Elzahed would not be made by her but by others: “Each occasion she doesn’t do it may be a separate offence.”

Odd that someone should bring a case to court if they don’t accept the authority of that court.

4 thoughts on “Why would you take a case to court if you don’t accept the authority of that court?”

  1. Unlike God the Father, the Creator of all matter who has always existed and will always exist, Allah is an imaginary being , having neither spiritual nor physical existence except in the minds of believers. For this reason Allah has no power to do anything either real or supernatural.

    However, the authority and power of the court is real. It is bestowed by God: “Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God”. (Romans 13:1)

    Refusing to stand before the God given authority of the court is disrespectful to the democratic laws of Australia and ultimately disrespectful to God as sovereign Lord of all creation.

    This Muslima has had repeated chances to obey Australian law but implies sharia is the only law she respects when she truculently insists that she will only stand for her god Allah.

    This Muslima, by refusing to abide by Australian law, is implying that she doesn’t want to be in Australia but rather in an Islamic country under Sharia.

    An Australian disrespecting a court of law in another country would probably be deported.

    Time to put us out of her misery. Save time and money. Pay her airfare to the nearest country under sharia.

    1. This Muslima has had repeated chances to obey Australian law but implies sharia is the only law she respects when she truculently insists that she will only stand for her god Allah.

      This Muslima, by refusing to abide by Australian law, is implying that she doesn’t want to be in Australia but rather in an Islamic country under Sharia.

      You are right: sharia is the only law she respects.

      But wrong on this one: she wants to be in Australia because the world belongs to allah, who has promised great rewards for those who migrate to make the world Islamic. She is on a mission to make Australia an Islamic country under shari’a.

      That’s why the demo prayers in the streets; that’s why the shrouds, the beards, the kaftans.

      “Terror made me victorious’, said Muhammad. This woman terrorises us with her shrouds and her litigation jihad.

  2. Muslims are never patriots; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims. Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, component of islam.

    No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

    Islam’s Sharia is either compatible with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

    Sharia denies freedom of speech, freedom of religion and equality. It requires corporal punishments. It requires perpetual war. It also requires that elected and appointed officials be Muslims.

    There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime (‘law’) and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

    There is really only one Qur’an, one islam, and one sharia.

    And since islam is inherently SEDITION against ALL sovereign national countries (which it regards as only temporary man-made false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the global muslim Ummah, ruled by their theocratic Caliphate government – Sura 18:26) because since the Qur’an and subsequent sharia elaborations embody “god’s” perfect laws which are to apply to all mankind everywhere, why would anyone ever need any merely human legislators (even ‘democratically elected’ ones)?!

    So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity and global crime-gang, why on earth are any of its holy mobster “muslim” gang members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

    Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

    Nation-hating leftist racists love islam because it’s full of poor oppressed angry violent noble swarthy savages who hate the idea of nations as much as they do! They think they can control muslims by coddling them, and aim the muslims at their mutual enemies – at the hard-working civilized patriotic nationalists.

Comments are closed.