These Women Will March As Long As Soros Pays…

Who bought all those pink hats?


Even the New York Times is commenting on the Astroturfed quality of the “Women’s March” against Trump.

Yes people,  spooky dude paid for the pink hats.

Pamela Geller’s article is below the fold.

WaPo & CNN are pushing this until the lights turn blue

Most of these females are too dumb to know what they’re protesting about, but they seem to be having fun. They are completely unaware of their “useful idiot” status. They are led by the nose by anti freedom and  anti democracy feminists. All of them are Shrillary supporters,  which comes with the democrat’s islamic agenda. The more noise they make, the stupider they sound and weaker they become.

Their message is rather incoherent, but their effort is admirable.

We men actually pay for our razors, but why would they care?

Soros Funds the “Woman’s March”

Meanwhile, Trump fights back against the ‘dishonest’ media
Reality Check: Sean Spicer hits the media over crowds

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer held an emergency press briefing on Saturday where he lit into the media for their “egregious” and “deliberately false reporting” of Friday’s inauguration of President Donald Trump and his first day in office.

Women’s marches: More than one million protesters vow to resist President Trump


Then there’s the harlot who can’t sing or dance, but believes she has something to say:

Madonna Drops F-Bombs at Anti-Trump Rally: ‘I’ve Thought a Lot About Blowing Up the White House’

Nasty: Networks Air Madonna F-Bombs at Anti-Trump Rally

‘I’ve Thought a Lot About Blowing Up the White House’– as a result, she is now being investigated by the FBI.

Asra Q. Nomani,  New York Times 01.20.17:

In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”?

The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”

It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace. But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump.

As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcomenixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda.

To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”?

Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march “partner,” told me his organization was “nonpartisan” but has “many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.” Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”

Really?, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”?

I found out: plenty.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.

On the issues I care about as a Muslim, the “Women’s March,” unfortunately, has taken a stand on the side of partisan politics that has obfuscated the issues of Islamic extremism over the eight years of the Obama administration. “Women’s March” partners include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has not only deflected on issues of Islamic extremism post-9/11, but opposes Muslim reforms that would allow women to be prayer leaders and pray in the front of mosques, without wearing headscarves as symbols of chastity. Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an “anti-Muslim extremist” in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its “anti-Muslim extremists” report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)

Another Soros grantee and march “partner” is the Arab-American Association of New York, whose executive director, Linda Sarsour, is a march co-chair. When I co-wrote a piece, arguing that Muslim women don’t have to wear headscarves as a symbol of “modesty,” she attacked the coauthor and me as “fringe.”

Earlier, at least 33 of the 100 “women of color,” who initially protested the Trump election in street protests, worked at organizations that receive Soros funding, in part for “black-brown” activism. Of course, Soros is an “ideological philanthropist,” whose interests align with many of these groups, but he is also a significant political donor. In Davos, he told reporters that Trump is a “would-be dictator.”

A spokeswoman for Soros’s Open Society Foundations, said in a statement, “There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections. There is no truth to these reports.” She added, “We support a wide range of organizations — including those that support women and minorities who have historically been denied equal rights. Many of whom are concerned about what policy changes may lie ahead. We are proud of their work. We of course support the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and petition their government—a vital, and constitutionally safeguarded, pillar of a functioning democracy.”

Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, “Kill Trump,” were not  “spontaneous,” as reported by some media outlets, the “Women’s March” is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, “women” have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was “sad” the march’s organizers masked their politics. “I want love for everyone,” she said.

The left’s fierce identity politics and its failure on Islamic extremism lost my vote this past election, and so, as the dawn’s first light breaks through the darkness of the morning as I write, I make my decision: I’ll lace up my pink Nikes and head to the inauguration, skipping the “Women’s March” that doesn’t have a place for women like me.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story has been updated to include a statement from the Open Society Foundations.

5 thoughts on “These Women Will March As Long As Soros Pays…”

  1. Wow,I bet they all felt the sense of liberation and belonging to the one common cause.
    Yes we’re well aware that you are equipped with vaginas,but Newsflash feminazis…..

    You can’t think with your pussies.
    You cannot be taken seriously when your emotions and opinions ebb and flow to your menstrual cycle..

    There there now, feeling better after your bleed?

    But in the name of all things equality,I will now turn my attention to the males who joined the precession/rally….

    Well you poor butt hurt Manginas,your game plan hasn’t worked out has it?
    You turned up hoping for popularity and acceptance from the girls,in return for a hopeful bit of pussy.
    What did you get?
    You absorbed all the anti-Patriarchy,-anti-so called white male privileged rants. All whilst being no more than emotional tampons to the feminazis. What a bunch of Fuds,and low value males you are.
    Commiserations are in the air for you!

    Enjoy the smelly yeast harbouring ugliness of your deluded self righteous marches against Western society.This modern thinking,and technologically developed society came about through Capitalism and Patriarchal guidance.
    It has afforded you increased life expectancy,generated wealth and opportunities,and Freedom.

    But if the this shower of shite would protest and riot in the countries where they practised
    Female Genital Mutilation.
    Raped women and children.
    Threw gays and lesbians from buildings.
    Practiced slavery….
    Then perhaps they’d be respected a little more. But then,they would most likely be shot or raped and beheaded.


  2. In Canada, a female conservative reporter was punched in the face by a socialist “male feminist” (aka CUCK) and the socialist women witnesses surrounding him hustled him off to safety while using every excuse in the book (which they claim to hate) to “justify” his public demonstration of “violence against women!”

    Leftists are criminal HYPOCRITES, and all feminazis are nothing more or less than slanderous victim-blaming extortionists!

    1. Uncle Vladdi,

      That is because the group politics of the Left are always Left first, then identity politics second.

      Which is why it is always amusing to see gay groups and feminist groups support muslims. Someday, in the future two of the three groups will have a very amusing reality check. It will most certainly be painful (literally) for the women and the gays…but..when you lay with fleas…

  3. Yes, because the Counterjihad movement is not far-right and support women rights (including abortion) and people’s right to protest in streets and… Oh wait.

  4. It was so wonderfully delicious that that amazing feminist pioneer Hilary Clinton showed the world just what happens when a feminist woman runs for the presidency and loses.

    She falls to pieces, has a tantrum, gets drunk and refuses to go out in public and lose gracefully. She ain’t no Maggie or Golda that’s for sure.


Comments are closed.