London’s Muslim mayor says Trump’s rhetoric is like that of the Islamic State
Islamo-shysters accuse us all the time because for them we are the enemy. Those of us in the frontline, like Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and many others including myself, have at one stage or other been accused of “being just like the terrorists”. The game of these Islamo-agitprops is obvious but based on falsehood and deception.
When Khan praises “contribution(s) American Muslims had made to the country, including as students, artists and politicians”, we must reject that. Muslim students benefit, they don’t contribute. There are no Muslim artists we couldn’t do without, and Muslim politicians are a great danger to us all. So is Khan. A sly deceiver in the service of the Muslim umma.
Khan to Trump: “They [the Islamic State] say that there is a clash of civilisations, it is not possible to be a Muslim and a westerner, and the west hates us. And you are inadvertently playing their game, you are helping them.”
This is a straw man. Trump has never said that it is not possible to be a Muslim and a Westerner. He is merely trying to keep jihadis out of the country. As people enter the country from jihadi hotspots, there are only two choices: keep out some harmless people or let in some harmful people. Trump is choosing the former; the entire political establishment is choosing the latter, on pain of charges of “racism” and “hate.” Khan, by setting up this straw man, is trying to intimidate people into thinking that it is a moral failing to oppose the “refugee” influx or try to take steps to resist jihad terror.
“Sadiq Khan: Trump’s language about Muslims is similar to Isis rhetoric,” by Anushka Asthana, Guardian, September 24, 2017:
Sadiq Khan has accused Donald Trump of adopting language similar to that used by Islamic State when he suggested a “total and complete shutdown” of US borders to Muslims.
Speaking at a Guardian Live event at the Labour party conference in Brighton, the London mayor said he was a “reluctant participant” in the continuing hostility between himself and the US president.
But Khan made it clear that he was offended by Trump’s call for a ban on Muslims and claim that he would make an exception for the Labour politician.
“My view was firstly ‘I’m not exceptional’ and secondly ‘Think about what you are saying.’ Because what you are saying is not dissimilar to what Daesh or so-called IS says.
“They say that there is a clash of civilisations, it is not possible to be a Muslim and a westerner, and the west hates us. And you are inadvertently playing their game, you are helping them.”
Speaking to the Guardian’s editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner, Khan praised the contribution American Muslims had made to the country, including as students, artists and politicians.
He said Trump’s ban on travellers from a number of Muslim-majority countries gave the “wrong impression” of the religion.
“I’m a westerner, but also a very proud Muslim. There are some people who want to divide our communities – I’m not going to let them,” Khan said….
This claim is absurd in the age of absurdity. Khan is a Paki Muslim, the son of a chora, a street sweeper. He is a 100% Muslim, nothing else. Islam divides the world in believers and disbelievers, nothing we can do about it. And Khan is lying into our face if he claims it isn’t so.