Pat Condell: a word to the criminal (Muslim) migrant

Youtube censored this vid almost immediately after its release.If you don’t watch anything else today, watch this and watch it again. Pat is not only a wordsmith like no other, he seriously hits  nails into the heads of our would be slave masters, just like Vlad Tepes (Dracula) did when the Ottoman emissaries came to collect the jiziya.

A Word To The Criminal Migrant from Pat Condell on Vimeo.

15 thoughts on “Pat Condell: a word to the criminal (Muslim) migrant”

  1. Absolutely bloody brilliant. Where the dickens has this man been all my life, he makes Nigel Farage seem like the Angel Gabriel, although they are both clearly speaking from the same hymn sheet.
    This needs to be spread amongst all the decent minded people the world over to put a permanent stop to the spread and eradication of those vile Muslims who follow the way these particular human vermin do.

  2. WHAT A GREAT SPEAKER, HOW CAN ANYONE DISAGREE WITH HIM. HOW LONG BEFORE HE IS SHUT DOWN. A GREAT MAN WHO TALKS SENSE.

  3. To John Garvey and others, Pat Condell and his message have been around for quite a long time, but he’s been kept OUT of the limelight by those same, all-knowing influential paragons of wisdom in society who have been responsible for allowing the delightful demographic providing Mr. Condells’ subject matter IN; and Youtube apparently agree with them because Youtube would seem not to want to upset them. The fact that Mr. Condell and (I guess) the millions who probably entirely agree with him are clearly already very upset indeed is apparently of no consequence.

  4. Pat gets it. I wish the do nothing sick ,perverted Politicians in Europe and some here in America would GET IT.
    These animals need to be put down in a thick bed of bacon and that they burn in Hell.
    These terrorist perverts need to be gone along with the Politicians that brought them here.

  5. In a way you cannot blame them entirely, as they are only carrying out their “prophet’s” wishes contained in a book called The Koran, which contains the most vile instructions, perpetuating the hatred of westerners and non believers.
    To properly understand the minds of their followers, I recommend a paperback book called “The secrets of the Koran” by Don Richardson. I have given this book to two ardent Moslems and asked each one to refute it’s contents. The result, it went very quiet! It contains passages from the Koran of 119 WAR verses and instructions on how to mutilate, subjugate, and eliminate any one who disagrees with Mohamed. He was betrothed to Aisha at the age of 6 and waited some time until she was 9 before consummating this “marriage” all with “Allah’s” consent. The book goes into great detail about all his other disgusting female conquests, and about how he got round taking his own adopted son’s wife away from him.
    Once read, you will understand how they can become violent and disgusting! those who bother to read the Koran! I’ve read through it, and found it to be the biggest load of rubbish printed. Happy reading, or not!!

  6. What are you calling a disgusting tissue of lies? Are you referring to the Koran, then I can agree with you! Including all the hadiths which are again all made up lies! You reap what you sow.

    1. There are more violent passages in the Bible than in the Koran! e.g. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/violence-more-common-in-bible-than-quran-text-analysis-reveals-a6863381.html.
      As any anthropologist, or common experience, will tell you, humans are one species and we all have the same hopes, fears and faults. Immigrants are not more criminal than any other type of human being, indeed there is evidence to suggest that they are less so. e.g. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/immigrants-do-not-increase-crime-research-shows/
      Generally they enrich their host country, at least after a short period of adjustment. e.g. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000681/068180eo.pdf. Just consider how Ugandan Asians have enriched the U.K. – if you dare!
      Even a very superficial examination of Swedish rape statistics reveals that it is nothing close to the “rape capital of the world”, as some would have it. e.g. https://www.snopes.com/crime-sweden-rape-capital-europe/
      You only have to look at the facts and put aside your preconceptions, something that most people find very difficult!

      1. Do understand the difference between descriptive and prescriptive? Are Christians, or Jews, or Buddhists for that matter, commanded to wage war against the world until all the people submit to their faith or are killed, Mr Anthropologist?

        1. Judaism is not a proselytising religion, but most are. Jews have had their equivalent of “Sharia Courts” -as they are incorrectly called for many years.
          Look at Deuteronomy 17 if you don’t think the Bible is just as intolerant of other religions as the Koran:
          “If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant; 17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded; 17:4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel; 17:5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.”
          Not that I’m religious, quite the contrary, but I do have a sneaking admiration for Bhuddism’s non-violent principles. I certainly condemn Islam, or any religion, where it encourages intolerance and violence, but that is by no means all of Islam. Look at the Sufi tradition, for example. The mistake is two-fold: condemning all the adherents of a religion for the actions of a few, and condemning those same adherents because of some violent passages in their holy book. You might as well consider all Christians to be murders because of the above-quoted passage, or, equally, on the basis of the killing of abortion doctors by the Army of God!
          I am not defending Islam: all religion is delusional, but Islam is not monolithic – it embraces many different strands and traditions, liberal and repressive, but most importantly, people are people, regardless of their religion.
          Not that everything in religion is bad. Christianity teaches (at least in some parts) compassion for those who by no fault of their own have fallen on hard times. Refugees – and this can include “economic migrants” in most cases – may be numbered amongst these.
          Which do you prefer, compassion or hate?

        2. Francis Banks, I don’t usually engage with posters unless I get the impression that they are genuine. A little knowledge can make a person believe that they have now become experts in a subject matter of which they know little. Your exegesis on Islam gives me the impression that you know next to nothing and that your knowledge is infused with a fair bit of naiveté.

          But I’ll bite:

          Islam is the most fiercely proselytising religion/ideology there is.

          Sharia councils are not equivalent to Beit Din in the Jewish community because Sharia, unlike Jewish law, asserts authority over unbelievers, as well as authority for governance. Moreover, with its sanction of wife-beating (Qur’an 4:34), devaluing of women’s testimony (Qur’an 2:282) and inheritance rights (Qur’an 4:11), allowance for polygamy (Qur’an 4:3), mandate of warfare against and subjugation of unbelievers (Qur’an 9:29), Sharia is incompatible with secular legal systems in numerous ways. Britain is in denial about that, as is the rest of the West. But sooner or later it will be quite painfully obvious to everyone. No Christian or Jew goes out to murder people quoting Deuteronomy.

          Deuteronomy or other parts of the OT are irrelevant because no Christian or Jew acts on it. The verses are descriptive, whereas the Qur’an is prescriptive in its entirety. No Christian or Jew goes on the warpath to murder unbelievers because of Deuteronomy. Muslims who murder infidels follow the Qur’an to the letter.

          You obviously know next to nothing about Islam, quoting the old chestnut “condemning all the adherents of a religion for the actions of a few, and condemning those same adherents because of some violent passages in their holy book”.

          We don’t need to do that, because Islam condemns itself in that it commands perpetual warfare until all the world submits, until all the people are subjugated under the sharia of Islam.

          “You might as well consider all Christians to be murders because of the above-quoted passage, or, equally, on the basis of the killing of abortion doctors by the Army of God!”

          This is gibberish and you know it.

          Here’s another handful of manure, directly copied from the steaming pile of taqiyya that Muslims regularly throw at gullible Westerners:

          ” Islam is not monolithic – it embraces many different strands and traditions, liberal and repressive, but most importantly, people are people, regardless of their religion.”

          All Muslims read the same Qur’an, they follow the same path and none of their “strands & traditions” has the wellbeing of the disbelievers, the kafirs, the mushrikeen, at heart.

          No Muslim is a refugee. All Muslims are soldiers of allah. Christian, or Jewish compassion for that matter, is totally misguided. The Islamic invasion is deadly for Western society, culture & civilisation. AYAH al-Anfal 8:7 makes that clear: wipe the unbelievers out, by their roots!

          Yes, lets look at the Sufi traditions:

          My personal favourite is Al-Ghazali (1058-1111) a Persian jurist who contributed significantly to the development of Sufism and is one of the most celebrated scholars in the history of Islamic thought.

          …[O]ne must go on jihad (i.e. razzias or raids) at least once a year … one may use a catapult against them when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire to them and/or drown them. … If a person of the ahl al-kitab [i.e. People of the Book] is enslaved, his marriage is revoked. … One may cut down their trees. … One must destroy their useless books. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide … they may steal as much food as they need…

          Ahmad Sirhindi (d. 1624) was an Islamic scholar and a prominent Sufi. He is regarded as having rejuvenated Islam, due to which he is commonly called “Mujadid Alf Thani”, meaning “reviver of the second millennium”.

          Shariat can be fostered through the sword.

          Kufr and Islam are opposed to each other. The progress of one is possible only at the expense of the other and co-existences between these two contradictory faiths in unthinkable.

          The honor of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects kafirs, dishonors the Muslims. To respect them does not merely mean honouring them and assigning them a seat of honor in any assembly, but it also implies keeping company with them or showing considerations to them. They should be kept at an arm’s length like dogs. … If some worldly business cannot be performed without them, in that case only a minimum of contact should be established with them but without taking them into confidence. The highest Islamic sentiment asserts that it is better to forego that worldly business and that no relationship should be established with the kafirs.

          The real purpose in levying jizya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that, on account of fear of jizya, they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honor and might of Islam.
          . . .
          Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam

          In light of this, your phoney question about my preference of hate or compassion is rejected out of hand. Mohammedans suck the hatred in with the mothers milk. They don’t deserve compassion. As I have a G-d given right to love all that is dear and precious to me, so do I have a sacred right to hate those who intend to destroy my world and everything in it. Islam dalenda est!

  7. Sensational .speaker ! He is the child who calls out ….but the emperor has no clothes on!..perfectly obvious to all but the fool’s making the big decisions..

  8. Wasted words Pat. Sadly though they are correct but wasted on the sub-human creatures they portray. The real reason we have the problem is not these cretins, the real problem is the politicians who bend over backwards to destroy our society. Politicians who provide the keys to the castle for the enemy to enter. No, “enemy” is not the wrong word here, because that is what we are being confronted with. To get rid of the disease we need to cure the cause.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *