“Europe needs mass Muslim migration to pay its pensions”

UN chief unveils plan to promote global mass migration

This header could just as well read “UN chief unveils plan to conquer the world by Islam”

Reminder:

 Out of the 1.2 million migrants who flooded into Germany in 2016, only “34,000 or 2.8% have found a job,” while only one-third of 1% found jobs in Sweden. In Britain, migrants were found to be “a net drain…on the order of between £115 and £160 billion.”

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres has unveiled his plan to promote global mass migration in the left-liberal Guardian newspaper…His article, titled ‘Migration can benefit the world. This is how we at the UN plan to help’, makes the bold claim that mass migration “powers economic growth, reduces inequalities and connects diverse societies”

His plan will be accepted unquestioningly by those who have difficulty comprehending the difference between responsible immigration and reckless immigration policy. To oppose a policy of leaving the gates wide open for any and everyone to enter, including those who have openly issued jihad threats, is not anti-immigrant.

Not all visible minority immigrants are mass rapists, jihadists, misogynists and haters of the West. So to imply that it is anti-immigrant to responsibly control borders is irrational. Europe is a mess, thanks to a globalist agenda which is destabilizing free societies and endangering the freedom of free speech and the rule of law.

The truth is that the UN is a stalwart friend and partner of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which has long abandoned the UN Declaration of Human Rights for the sharia-driven Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which God made the best nation that has given mankind a universal and well-balanced civilization in which harmony is established between this life and the hereafter and knowledge is combined with faith; and the role that this Ummah should play to guide a humanity confused by competing trends and ideologies and to provide solutions to the chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.

In mid-December, the OIC weighed in on mass migration into Europe — not surprisingly supporting the hijrah — with the lie that Europe needs mass Muslim migration to pay its pensions. Out of the 1.2 million migrants who flooded into Germany in 2016, only “34,000 or 2.8% have found a job,” while only one-third of 1% found jobs in Sweden. In Britain, migrants were found to be “a net drain…on the order of between £115 and £160 billion.”

So now, OIC puppet and socialist António Guterres is out to convince all that “Migration can benefit the world.” President Trump has rejected Guterres’ plan as “simply not compatible with US sovereignty.”

“New United Nations Boss Unveils Plan to Promote Global Mass Migration”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, January 12, 2018:

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres has unveiled his plan to promote global mass migration in the left-liberal Guardian newspaper.

Guterres, a former Socialist Party prime minister in his native Portugal, took over the top job at the UN on January 1st, having previously served as the institution’s High Commissioner for Refugees.

His article, titled ‘Migration can benefit the world. This is how we at the UN plan to help’, makes the bold claim that mass migration “powers economic growth, reduces inequalities and connects diverse societies”, in order to promote the Global Compact for Migration.

“This will be the first overarching international agreement of its kind,” he boasted — but claimed it would not “place any binding obligations on states”, but rather serve as “an unprecedented opportunity for leaders to counter the pernicious myths surrounding migrants”.

These assurances have failed to convince the Donald Trump administration in the United States, with the White House rejected it as “simply not compatible with US sovereignty”, and President Trump summarising it as “no borders, everyone can come in!”

Prime Minister Theresa May’s government in the United Kingdom has not pulled out, however — apparently unconcerned by its implications.

Guterres said it was crucial to “recognise and reinforce the benefits of migration … Migrants make huge contributions to both their host countries and countries of origin.”

He made the contentious claim that migrants “take jobs” that local workers “cannot” fill, and asserted that this is a positive thing. He also attempted to spin the fact that migrants send huge sums of money straight out of their host countries and back to their countries of origin as a kind of supplement to foreign aid.

The new secretary general is not the first senior UN figure to extoll the supposed benefits of mass migration. The intergovernmental institution has promoted it as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” through its #ForMigration campaign for some time…..

In 2012, he infamously remarked that the European Union — which he had previously served as a European Commissioner — should be doing its best to “undermine national homogeneity” and promote “multicultural states” through mass migration.

 

2 thoughts on ““Europe needs mass Muslim migration to pay its pensions””

  1. The UN is in my opinion a corrupt organization, how can it stand for Human Rights if countries that have none are allowed to sit on the committee? Saudi Arabia and China,the Saudi’s have also formed an all male group for women’s rights,how have the other member countries accepted this? it is so laughable and doesn’t make sense.
    ‘Migration can benefit the world? ‘ islamic migration has ruined our once freedom loving countries as intended when they declared world ‘jihad’ we would be committing genocide by opening our borders ,Antonio Gutterres also says ‘migrants make huge contributions to both their host countries and countries of origin’? in Australia money that should be going to our hospital,roads and schools is being diverted to security to protect us from the enemy within ,something very unfamiliar to us ,we have lost some of our freedoms since welcoming some migrants as they are easily offended, such as freedom of speech which we Australians value highly,I can’t think of any gains we have made.
    Islam is not a religion ,an ideology which like religions consists of people from all countrie and cultures and is therefore also not a race, why is the UN insisting on other countries taking more muslim migrants Australia being one ,when the Saudi’s refuse to take any? dam hypocrites,the teaching and beliefs of Islam are not ours ,why are we civilized countries having this barbaric ideology forced upon us by the UN , what are the other members of the UN doing about it? if anything.

Comments are closed.