Quality Reporting From George Soros’s Fake News Media Complex

THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY !

The Fake News Media Complex  has got together to organise resistance to what THEY call Fake News…. just listen to them, this is scripted and rehearsed from Soros HQ. The good thing though, is they KNOW they are losing control of the means of information.

Paul Weston

Corrupt, mindless sock puppets, all of them!

In other news:

Massive anti-India protests erupt in southern Kashmir 

Now it makes sense: one big Concealment ,Child Abuse, Files Missing, Denials, Lies, Deceit, Whitewash, just one big Deception, very sad:

UK gives $28,300,000 to “Palestinian” schools glorifying jihad and Islamic martyrdom 

They are pretty far gone:

UK teachers blast attempts to ban hijab in schools as “racism dressed as liberalism”

UK: Authorities in Telford still failing to investigate Muslim rape gangs properly 

Nigeria: Muslim family returned escaped Christian girl to jihadi captors 

More from the Religion of Peace:

Girls in Germany Told to Wear Hijab to Deter Muslim Harassment…
World Cup Massacre Plot Came Together in a Mosque…
British Taxpayers Funded Hate in Palestinian Schools: £20 Million…
Hindu Prosecutor ‘Disappears’ After Taking on Killer Islamists…
Middle East Violence Spills Over into German Streets…
RCMP Won’t Arrest Canadians Who Tortured American Hostage…
20% of Babies in France Born to Muslim Parents…
(Germany) Syrians Charged with Mosque Arson…
Kuwait’s ‘Unified Sermon’ Slams Yoga as a “Call to Atheism”…
Italy: Illegal Arrested After Trying to Drive Stolen Car into Church Crowd
(Nigeria) Muslim Family Returned Kidnapped Christian Girl to Captors
Ahmadi Minorities Attacked at Mosque by Sunni Mob…
Swedish Student Suspended After Discovering ‘Migrants’ Responsible for 95% of Sex Crimes…
Man Kidnaps Daughter, Joins ISIS with ‘More Religious’ Nanny…
UK Labour Turned Down Diversity Training from Jewish Group…

6 thoughts on “Quality Reporting From George Soros’s Fake News Media Complex”

  1. Even the most vile leftopaths are starting to get it! See here:

    http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/gormley-fake-news-and-inconvenient-news-arent-the-same-thing

    (Shannon Gormley is usually one of their most rabid, islamo-pandering SJW “journalists” but even this troll gets it – a bit)!

    “The news media, which has historically endeavoured to discern which of a politician’s statements are false and which are true, has been outmatched by the modern officeholder who is determined to discern which news item is fake and which is trustworthy.

    This is not a fair fight, of course. The media could only ever deliver its judgments through speech; the politician now enshrines his in law.

    But never mind! The matter before us isn’t about fairness in speech, says the man attempting to regulate speech in his favour.

    Nor is it about free speech, says the same man attempting to restrict speech for his benefit.

    This, as ever, is about democracy.”

    😉

  2. “HATE SPEECH!”? What’s that all about – HURT FEEWINGS!?

    All anti-hurt-feelings “laws” are only put forth by literal psychopaths, who pretend that “feelings HURT!”

    i.e: that fear CAUSES pain, simply by being a vague, general memory of past specific pains, future-projected.

    Psychopaths are all criminal hypocrites who CHOOSE to experience ALL emotions – even soft ones like sadness and sympathy – AS pains, and so also pretend they then have a “right” to counter-attack others for “causing” them!

    But as physiologists, psychiatrists and psychologists know, pain is quickly forgotten, by default, in humans.

    It’s why some of us don’t learn from mistakes, sometimes not even by direct, “hot-stove” scenario incidents!

    Therefore, all claims of others’ words or deeds making people “uncomfortable” and “causing trauma,” are false.

    At the very most, they are subjective and unprovable, (and further: not permanent, as one can be acclimated or habituated to any non-physical damage-caused ‘pains,’ including all normal and abnormal fears) and as such, one cannot attack innocent others in advance by making “laws” to prohibit their free expressions, just because they might at some future time, in some unknown place, cause some sort of emotional “offense” to persons unknown.

    Any and all attempts to do so are subjective hypocrisy, claiming only one’s own chosen group has any real rights, while everyone else only has the responsibility to be enslaved to them, and no rights of self-defense against it.

    Therefore any and all such “laws” are crimes, in attacking innocents first: so those making them are criminals.

    ….

    “The whole concept of “hate speech” (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society.”

    – Patrick1984 –

    ….

    But Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992), Virginia v. Black (2003), Snyder v. Phelps (2011) These SCOTUS cases show that unpopular speech is still protected speech.

    SO: What is “hate-speech” and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?

    If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!

    Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!

    ALL “Hate-Speech Laws” ARE CRIMES!

    “Progressive” criminals – who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims’ rights – pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).

    So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!

    Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?

    NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.

    Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.

    Such criminal leftists who try to make “h0ate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!

    Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats … and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!

  3. Making “hate” into a crime, really only makes it “illegal” to hate crimes and the criminals who cause them.

    “HATE” isn’t the problem, it’s a symptom they have to address to distract us from what they’re really trying to ban.

    Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals insist they have no choices because we’re all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don’t, they insist pity is always good and anger is always bad.

    Since criminals expect that all is generally allowed unless and until it is very specifically disallowed in advance, the only real crime is trying to prevent them from doing whatever they want to do, to whomever they want to do it to, and whenever they want to do it. Such attempts are always seen by them as “mean!” or more recently, “HATEFUL!”

    But as Robert Spencer noted:

    Incitement to violence is easy to spot – but incitement to “hostility” is in the eye of the beholder; so all anti-free-speech initiatives conflate (anti-crime) free speech and even (what they call “hateful”) feelings with actual violent crimes; for instance trying to criminalize speech against a religion or race (say, against someone for their simply noticing that islam isn’t really a race or a religion at all, but is only a global crime-gang).

    The whole notion of “hate-speech” and “hate-crimes” IS a crime! Having “hate” isn’t a criminal act, it’s EITHER the perfectly natural and neutral human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing injustices (like islam), OR it’s a victim-blaming slanderous HABIT; but either way, it’s only an effect, and not a cause of anything. I hate crimes & the criminals who commit them; so what?

    “Hate crimes” are really only thought-crimes, which is a victim-blaming slanderous assertion made by criminals to deflect everyone’s attention away from their own crimes (since criminals are psycho-paths who hate thinking, of course to them nobody else should ever be allowed to indulge in potentially “dangerous” thinking, either) by asserting that anyone merely considering or feeling that one should dislike something bad – ANYTHING bad, aka crime and criminals – should be accused of committing the only “illegal crime” in itself: “Hate!”

    So, hadn’t you heard?! Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

  4. This ILLEGAL and wholly subjectivist “HURT FEELINGS” nonsense has got to stop!

    Offense can only be taken, never given! If someone says something mean and untrue about you, you either consider the source and scornfully laugh it off, file a lawsuit for defamation, (slander and libel are forms of fraud) or a crime report for inciting violence, if they went that far.

    But these recent fake judge-made “laws” are really only onus-reversing crimes, as in:

    “You have to prove you DIDN’T hurt my feelings, or else you owe me money! Nyah!”

    And there’s no such thing as a state of permanent, ongoing “emotional distress” that isn’t deliberately and willfully, habitually obsessed about – because our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!

    Further, libertine “liberal” criminals have to resort to whining about their hurt feewings, simply because they don’t have any actual facts to justify their many crime excuses!

    So, being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is now to be deemed the highest moral virtue!

    So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

    So any and all legislators, judges, and educators who put criminals’ hurt feelings above facts should be fired and JAILED.

    And that includes using the words “Respect!” and “Dignity!”

    Objectifying people as “victims!” is what really “disrespects their dignity!”

    Any and all “laws” criminalizing hurt feelings should be repealed and their originators fired and JAILED, too!

    Because all subjectivist “laws” are really adversarial crimes, seeking to use fraudulent slander to extort and enslave others. Fraud, slander, extortion and slavery (aka “Political Correctness”) are already crimes.

    Who complains about hurt feelings (aka defending their “dignity”) anyway?! ONLY criminals!

    They always feel hurt and left out when others try and succeed and they don’t, so they feel jealous and entitled to demand an equality of outcome and permanent rights (like, to your stuff) without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like to earn or otherwise have to pay for it) over an equality of opportunity! i.e: to extort a right to remain irresponsibly wrong – to be able to angrily, “hatefully” attack others first while demanding a false right to be pities for their chosen stance!

    Which is why they invented the whole nonsensical and emotive concept of “HATE CRIMES!” – because, in making “hate” into a crime, they extortively try to make it “illegal” for their potential victims to hate their crimes!

    Any law-abiding person who gets robbed or extorted doesn’t feel “sad” or “uncomfortable” about it, they feel righteously ANGRY! So their constant demands for pity is one really good way to tell an extortive victimology-spewing criminal from a real victim of same!

  5. Logically all criminals demanding equality of outcome (enslaving their victims) must also demand that other people (their victims) must not hurt the lazy criminal parasites’ feelings!

    Hurt “feelings” are all any criminal has as an excuse, as the cause-and-effect facts are always against them.

    Therefore they are also the only thing that ever matters to criminal (leftist) legislators, lawyers, and judges.

    Feelings aren’t important – they’re not thoughts, much less virtues or morals! They can be wrong: one can feel love for someone who means one harm, and distrust of someone who has only one’s best interests at heart. Our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending! As such, emotions of feelings are also neutral “virtual objects,” which one can (and manipulative psycho-paths frequently do) use as weapons against others, at will.

    Victimology is where the highest moral virtue is to PITY all criminals as “fellow victims” and the only crime is to get ANGRY at them! It is emotional extortion and cause-and-effect reversing victim blaming idolatrous slander!

    Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals insist they have no choices because we’re all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don’t, they insist pity is always good and anger is always bad.

    Always promoting pity in response to crime only condones, enables, and encourages it while defaming its real victims. Banning anger towards criminals also re-victimizes and extortively enslaving their victims.

    So promoting hurt feelings as the most vile crime, and defending them as the highest virtue, IS a crime.

    Any and all legislators, judges, and educators who put criminals’ hurt feelings above facts should be fired and JAILED.

    And that includes using the words “Respect!” and “Dignity!”

    Objectifying people as “victims!” is what really “disrespects their dignity!”

    Any and all “laws” criminalizing hurt feelings should be repealed and their originators fired and JAILED, too!

    Because all subjectivist “laws” are really adversarial crimes, seeking to use fraudulent slander to extort and enslave others. Fraud, slander, extortion and slavery (aka “Political Correctness”) are already crimes.

    Who complains about hurt feelings (aka defending their “dignity”) anyway?!

    ONLY criminals!

    They always feel hurt and left out when others try and succeed and they don’t, so they feel jealous and entitled to demand an equality of outcome and permanent rights (like, to your stuff) without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like to earn or otherwise have to pay for it) over an equality of opportunity! i.e: to extort a right to remain irresponsibly wrong – to be able to angrily, “hatefully” attack others first while demanding a false right to be pities for their chosen stance!

    Which is why they invented the whole nonsensical and emotive concept of “HATE CRIMES!” – because, in making “hate” into a crime, they extortively try to make it “illegal” for their potential victims to hate their crimes!

    Any law-abiding person who gets robbed or extorted doesn’t feel “sad” or “uncomfortable” about it, they feel righteously ANGRY! So their constant demands for pity is one really good way to tell an extortive victimology-spewing criminal from a real victim of same!

    So, hadn’t you heard?! Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!

    Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, they must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking – through an emotional, sub-conscious “narrative” – so much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:

    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

    Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!

Comments are closed.