Decolonizing, de-whitefying and de-bougeoisfying

IF TONY JONES IS ISLAM’S ENEMY, THEN WHO ISN’T?

A Muslim on Q&A speaks of wanting people to be “afraid” of him. Yet when host Tony Jones anxiously gives him the chance to explain that he means he wants to be feared for his words rather than actions, it is Jones who is accused of damaging the image of Islam:

Speaking as a guest on the panel, Michael Mohammed Ahmad, author of The Lebs, was railing against racism and Islamophobia, saying bigots “should be afraid of him” and “the majority of people” who will “stop the bigotry and hatred that they’re spreading”.

Jones interjected and said: “In your case, you’re talking about with your pen or your typewriter, correct?”

Ahmad fired back: “What, because you’re worried that I’m implicating some kind of violent action?”

“I’m giving you the opportunity to say that you aren’t,” said Jones.

“Of course I’m not,” said Ahmad. And then, in a dig at Jones’ request for clarification, he added: “I just find it really cheap when there’s a concern that Muslims are inciting violence, because if you looked at the foreign policies of the West they are the most violent people on the planet.”

The tense exchange did not go unnoticed on social media, with many Twitter users deeming Jones’ remark “offensive” and “unbelievable”.

We are in dangerous times, where even Islam’s excusers are treated as the enemy. And, my the way, the media is in dangerous territory, too, when it takes its cues from social media.

Why does news.com.au think this person’s view is worth reporting above those of millions of other Australians?

Naturally, a professional victim much touted by the ABC leaps in:

Jones assumed nothing. He offered the opportunity for clarification to a man ranting about wanting people to be “afraid” of him in the context of more than a dozen Muslim Lebanese here having been jailed for terrorism.

Anyone who does not see this as Jones trying to help Islam’s image rather than besmirching it is part of a very big problem.

UPDATE

Naturally, a professor at Melbourne University applies a modern racist and reheated neo-Marxist analysis:

I daresay it is because of arseholes like Ghassan Hage that we have a Muslim problem in the first place.

3 thoughts on “Decolonizing, de-whitefying and de-bougeoisfying”

  1. Vile Putrid Malevolent Deceitful Vicious islam criminal Michael Mohammed Ahmad, an islam biased [so called] “author” determinedly spreading sick islam propaganda and yet another “Sick Guest” on QandA, was [as usual for islamophiles islams and marxist SJW”s] railing against racism and Islamophobia, saying
    • bigots “should be afraid of him” and
    • “the majority of people” who will “stop the bigotry and hatred that they [the bigots] are spreading”.

    They (the islamophiles and their SJW’s and the islams) keep telling us what they are going to do to us (non-islams) [exterminate us] yet we don’t listen (we ignore at our peril) to what they keep tell us they are going to do to us … why why WHY do we keep ignoring their clear statements of evil and criminal intention !!!

    and the islams are allowed continual immigration and residency in Australia assisted by Australia’s islamophile “authorities
    (aka the assisting coward politicians unamazingly including THE Derryn Hinch and THAT Pauline Hanson with one very notable heroic exception – Fraser Anning … and his face reality anti-islam immigration inaugural speech which was vilified by EVERY islamophile and EVERY islam member of Parliament and ALL the usual marxist mind controlled SJW’s on their social media accounts) !!!

    non-islamophile/non-islam Australians stop being suicidal …
    get rid of the deathly islamophile and islam plague infecting our country and threatening the existence of each and every non-islam citizen
    !!!

  2. ALL muslims are criminals, as being members of the ancient, ongoing global extortion racket called islam.

    In sharia law texts, muslims are SUPPOSED to be regarded as threats (as “objects of fear”) by all the unbelievers, whether or not the individual muslim has itself actually committed any crimes.

    (As documented in the Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, INSTITUTES, on pages 154 & 157); Qur’an 8:57 & 60.

    And of course The Prophit said he was “made victorious with terror”[Bukhari 4.52.220] and Allah said he would and did “cast terror” [3.151, 33.26].

    From the main Hanafi sharia manual, The Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, INSTITUTES, on pages 154 & 157:

    154 I N S T I T U T E S. Book IX.

    S E C T I O N.

    Protection granted by a single person is valid.

    IF a free person grant protection to an infidel, or to a body of infidels, or to the people of a fort or city, the protection is valid, whether the person granting it be a man or a woman; and no person of the Mussulmans is afterwards at liberty to molest them; because the prophet has said “if the least among the MUSSULMANS grant protection to an infidel, and make a compact with him, it behoves the whole to observe such protection and compact, and not to break it;”** and the learned agree that the word adna, [the least,] in this saying, means a single person; — and also, because any single Mussulman is empowered to make war upon the infidels, wherefore they fear him, since he is competent to oppose them; by his granting protection, therefore, protection is established as from him, since he is one of whom protection may be asked; because the object of fear is the object to which to look for protection; and a single Mussulman is the object of fear,

    SINGLE MOSLEMS ARE TO BE FEARED, AS THEY ARE EMPOWERED TO MAKE WAR ON INFIDELS. THIS MEANS ALL MOSLEMS ARE TERRORISTS; IT ALSO MEANS THEY CAN RAPE THE LOSERS’ WIVES.

    ;-(

    (according to what was before asserted, that “the infidels fear him;”) by his granting them protection, therefore, protection is established as from him, and it then extends to all others besides the person who grants it; in the same manner as in the case of seeing the new moon at the commencement of Ramzan*; — for, if a person testify to seeing the new-moon of Ramzan, saying “I see it,” the fast of Ramzan becomes incumbent upon him, and the obligation then extends to all others; — and so in the present case likewise, the protection becomes binding upon all others besides the person who grants it, — and the obligation of it extends from him to all the rest, — and they are not at liberty to infringe it. — Moreover, the cause of the validity of protection is the act of protecting; and as that is not of a divisible nature, so the

    i.e: PROTECTION OF INFIDELS IS NOT AUTOMATIC; IT’S SITUATIONAL!

    ;-(

    * The ninth month of the Mohammedan year, during which a strict fast is enjoined, commencing from the first appearance of the new moon.

    AKA: RAMADAN.

    ;-|

    ——-

    MORE DIRECT PROOF MOSLEMS ARE ALLOWED TO ENSLAVE OTHER MOSLEMS:

    (A) slave may also be a believer, and may consequently possess a power of resistance*: the protection granted by an unlicenced slave, therefore, is valid, in the same manner as the protection granted by a slave who has been permitted to engage in war; – and in the same manner, also, as a contract of fealty or subjection is valid; (for, if an alien were to execute a contract of fealty before a slave, and the slave agree thereto, the contract is valid†; and so here likewise.) — The reason why a slave, not licenced to engage {157} in war, is held in the same light as one who is licenced, is that the cause of the validity of the protection granted by the licenced slave is his being a believer, and consequently capable of resistance; and this circumstance is constituted the cause, on the ground that faith is conditional to piety, and war [with infidels] is an act of piety.

    SO: (NON-DEFENSIVE) “WAR WITH INFIDELS IS AN ACT OF PIETY.”

    ALLAH = EVIL.

    ;-(

    — This power of resistance, moreover, is made a condition, in order that the protection may be established as from its proper source, since the object of fear is the object to which to look for protection.

    AGAIN CONFIRMS ISLAM IS EXTORTION AND ALL MOSLEMS ARE EXTORTIONISTIC TERRORISTS.

    😉

    ——-

    See also Tirmidhi, Chapter 15, # 1277:

    Umm Malik Al-Bahziyyah narrated that the Messenger of Allah mentioned Fitnah, such that it was drawing near. She said: “I said: ‘O Messenger of Allah! Who is the best of people during it?’ He said: ‘A man among his livestock, who pays what is due on them, and worships his Lord. And a man clutching the head of his horse, terrified of the enemy, and they terrified of him,'” (Hasan)

  3. And, re: “DECOLONIZING, DE-WHITEFYING AND DE-BOUGEOISFYING:”

    Leftopaths hate “painful” thinking.

    “The Left hates the West. This is why they want so desperately to replace our population with foreigners. This is why they want us to abort our children, and sterilize our women. This is why they want to tax and regulate our economy into the dirt. This is why they want to remove our historical monuments. This is why they cheer for masked anarchists who assault cops and reporters. This is why they want us disarmed.

    Greatness indeed requires discrimination. Without discrimination, greatness is impossible. Indiscriminate hiring does not an elite workforce make. Indiscriminate immigration does not improve the quality of a population. Only the lowest of the low have sex indiscriminately.

    The Left doesn’t want the West to be great. They want us to eliminate all standards, and reduce us to one uniform, genderless, brown slime, wholly dependent on the largesse of the State for our sustenance.”

    – A Now-Infamous, Former Libertarian –

    😉

Comments are closed.