Islamic Blasphemy Laws to Censor All of Us

Trump hits Google for skewing results against him, Google denies — but evidence shows Trump is right

Robert Spencer

President Trump is, not surprisingly, getting a lot of flak for this. CNN, as objective as ever, has a risible article entitled, “Debunking Donald Trump’s latest conspiracy theory on Google.” In it, Chris Cillizza complains about the original article revealing Google’s search bias against Trump because in it, “every major mainstream media outlet in the country — from CNN to The New York Times to The Washington Post to Bloomberg is cast as left-leaning.”

Uh, yeah, Chris, because they are.

More below the fold.

Bokhari: Social Media Platforms Don’t Actually Need to Ban Anyone

Why Masters of Universe Don’t Actually Need to Ban Anyone
Twitter Suspends More Accounts for ‘Engaging in Coordinated Manipulation’
Facebook, Google, Twitter Fight Net Neutrality: ISPs Shouldn’t Censor, But We Can

Trump Vows to Defend Citizens from Masters of the Universe!

 Silicon Valley Censorship Could Have ‘Big Influence’ on Elections
Google, Facebook, Twitter ‘Have It RIGGED’

Google, Facebook, Twitter

“I think what Google and what others are doing – if you look at what is going on with Twitter and if you look at what’s going on in Facebook, they better be careful, because you can’t do that to people,” Trump said. “You can’t do it.”

Google Responds to Trump: ‘No Political Bias in Google Search’

Google Responds to Trump: ‘No Political Bias in Google Search’

Caroline Glick: German-led E.U. Sides with Iran Against America

Glick: German-led E.U. Sides with Iran Against America

Israeli Officials Hail Trump Move To Cut Aid To Palestinian Refugees

Pakistan to press UN, OIC for international restrictions on speech in line with Islamic blasphemy laws

“We need a similar policy for this matter so that people do not repeatedly hurt our sentiments.”

What group has any protection against those who hurt their sentiments? No group. But Islamic law forbids criticism of Islam, and Pakistan is intent upon forcing that aspect of Sharia upon the rest of the world.

“Muslim countries have failed to tackle matter of blasphemous content, says PM Khan in Senate,” Dawn, August 27, 2018:

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Monday said that the absence of an international policy against the generation of blasphemous content is a “collective failure” on part of the Muslim countries.

Robert Spencer: The Left Moves Fast to Silence Me

Companies are still trusting the Southern Poverty Law Center. I’ve started an Indiegogo page now to finance a suit against the Southern Poverty Law Center. Will the SPLC pressure Indiegogo to drop a page critical of the SPLC? We shall see. My latest in PJ Media:

Robert Spencer, continued:

Anyway, on July 26, 2017, I posted this at Jihad Watch: “Google bows to Muslim pressure, changes search results to conceal criticism of Islam and jihad.” In it, I recounted Texas imam Omar Suleiman’s successful effort to compel Google to drop search results about Islam-related terms and topics that reflected negatively upon Islam. Turkey’s Anadolu Agency reported happily: “Google’s first page results for searches of terms such as ‘jihad’, ‘shariah’ and ‘taqiyya’ now return mostly reputable explanations of the Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which describes the circumstances under which a Muslim can conceal their belief in the face of persecution, is the sole term to feature a questionable website on the first page of results.”

“Reputable”: i.e., acceptable under the Sharia prohibition on criticism of Islam. “Questionable website”: i.e., one that tells hard truths about Islam and jihad.

So this has been going on for quite some time, as it is virtually certain that Google wasn’t skewering the results only about Islam and jihad in July 2017. Only now is it being discovered by the general public. Trump is right to call the social media giants out. Let’s hope he can stop them before the make the First Amendment an entirely dead letter.

“Trump: Facebook, Twitter, Google are ‘treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful,’” by Ryan Browne, CNBC, August 28, 2018:

President Donald Trump doubled down on threats against Facebook, Twitter and Google Tuesday afternoon, saying the social platforms are “treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful.”

“Google has really taken advantage of a lot of people and I think that’s a very serious thing and it’s a very serious charge,” Trump told reporters after a meeting with the president of FIFA. “They better be careful because they can’t do that to people.”

A Twitter spokesperson, when asked to respond to Trump’s comments, pointed to previous statements and congressional testimony denying any form of conservative bias on the platform. A spokesperson for Facebook did not immediately return request for comment.

Trump earlier Tuesday accused Google of altering search results to prioritize negative coverage and left-leaning outlets and warned that the issue “will be addressed.”

Trump said in a tweet that the tech giant’s search engine had “rigged” news story results to show mostly “bad” stories about him and other conservatives.

“Google search results for ‘Trump News’ shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake New Media,” the president said.

“In other words, they have it RIGGED, for me & others, so that almost all stories & news is BAD. Fake CNN is prominent. Republican/Conservative & Fair Media is shut out.”

Trump added: “Illegal? 96% of … results on ‘Trump News’ are from National Left-Wing Media, very dangerous. Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives and hiding information and news that is good. They are controlling what we can & cannot see. This is a very serious situation-will be addressed!”

Around 11 a.m. ET, Trump deleted the original tweets and reposted practically identical language.

“When users type queries into the Google Search bar, our goal is to make sure they receive the most relevant answers in a matter of seconds,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday.

“Search is not used to set a political agenda and we don’t bias our results toward any political ideology. Every year, we issue hundreds of improvements to our algorithms to ensure they surface high-quality content in response to users’ queries. We continually work to improve Google Search and we never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment.”…

2 thoughts on “Islamic Blasphemy Laws to Censor All of Us”

  1. Isdamnic blasphemy law is found in Reliance, book o, chapter 8. o8.0-1 prescribe the death penalty. o8.7 lists twenty acts and attitudes entailing blasphemy. 011.10 applies it to us; o9.14 specifies the penalty applied to us.

    G.A. & HRC resolutions are not enforceable. International human rights covenants such as ICERD can be enforced in the World Court.

    The HRC’s Ad Hoc Cmtee. On Elaboration Of Contemporary Standards m meets each year to discuss coding a protocol to ICERD. The next meeting is from Oct. 8-19 in Geneva. See this pdf file for the disgusting details.

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/110660182/AdHocCmteOnCompStds

    In Ash-Shifa, there is a discussion of the legal necessity of killing anyone who disses Moe. It is in the area of page 717. Read it and get more clues.

  2. Hey, Sheik!

    (Apologies in advance: While I’m sorry to have to go all “Don Laird” or “John Daniel” on you, some things just need to be said, albeit in perhaps greater detail than is usual for a mere comments section)!

    With a title like “ISLAMIC BLASPHEMY LAWS TO CENSOR ALL OF US” … didn’t you mean to reference THIS JW article?!

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/pakistan-to-press-un-oic-for-international-restrictions-on-speech-in-line-with-islamic-blasphemy-laws

    Sure I see you mentioned it at the bottom of the above rant, with this little snippet:

    “Pakistan to press UN, OIC for international restrictions on speech in line with Islamic blasphemy laws” – “We need a similar policy for this matter so that people do not repeatedly hurt our sentiments.”

    What group has any protection against those who hurt their sentiments? No group. But Islamic law forbids criticism of Islam, and Pakistan is intent upon forcing that aspect of Sharia upon the rest of the world.”

    But (and there’s always a “but”) … WELL, actually, re: “What group has any protection against those who hurt their sentiments?”

    FAR TOO MANY GROUPS IN OUR LIBERTINE VICTIMALITY EXTORTING WORLD OF IDENTITY POLITICS have “LEGAL” protections defending their groups’ “HURT FEEWINGS!” enshrined in our Western, pity-based “laws,” these days!

    Law began as Religion, as religious law; we have not yet managed to shake off those superstitious chains.

    SO MANY OBJECTIVE LAWS ARE BASED ON DEFENDING SUBJECTIVE HURT FEELINGS (“DIGNITY;” “RESPECT” synonyms)!

    Too many supposedly objective laws these days are devoted to defending subjective “hurt feelings!” (insert synonyms like “dignity” and “respect”)!

    How and why are our laws still based on EMOTIONS?!

    Thanks to Judeo-Christianity in the West, and islam in the East, law is based on idolatry: on the static, “abstracted” from its dynamic situational circumstances, form of the emotion of fear known as despair.

    Such processes of the habitual Submission to a literally psychotic, thought-killing pre-judicial ritual imitation of rational thinking – where such insane notions as “mercy” and “compassion” (pity) in the West, and of intolerant anger in the East, render humans into mindless animals, enforced by “law!”

    Re: “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you…”

    Pity your enemies instead of their victims?! Only criminals say that!

    Always turn the other cheek; Vengeance is the Lord’s alone; Love your enemy; Judge not – ever; and my own favourite: Resist ye not evil men!

    Useless Pity (aka mercy; compassion; forgiveness) is the highest of Christian virtues, while useful anger (aka “Hate!”) is the most vile sin.

    Conclusion: Christianity is a form of slave-making thought-control, too.

    Now pitying the victims and the criminals AS victims, is the highest moral virtue, while being angry or “hateful” towards criminals and crime is the most vile sin.

    (But, haven’t those always been the most basic boilerplate Christian tenets!)?

    So Christianity is just as bad as islam!

    Christianity falsely attempts to permanently tie morality to our emotions (anger: bad; pity: good).

    Christianity simply tries to sucker us into substituting useless pity for useful anger “to have peace!”

    It’s a form of government thought-control (just see Psaul openly advocating for our self-enslavement).

    It is a form of idolatry, where static absolutes avoid all dynamic circumstantial, situational realities.

    Who demands that we should always have victim-betraying pity for criminals rather than their victims?! Only criminals do such things! Even if they say we should pity both equally as fellow victims, it only denies the fact that the commission of crimes can only come through the exercise of free-will choice!

    And if we have no free will (“forgive them for they know not what they do”) then god is only a slaver.

    Perpetual pity IS “Corruption” of rationality, not true morality; and so is “mercy”-based Christianity.

    It’s just as much a form of slavery as is perpetual anger-based islam; they are COMPLEMENTARY opposites!

    Both Christianity and islam are forms of idolatry, where a pre-existing static pattern of literally psychotic, thought-killing ritual behaviour is urged to be imposed in advance on all dynamic situational circumstances which can ever occur in our lives; such “religions” are pointless and destructive slavery to our fears: one advocates pointless eternal anger and the other pointless pity; both Submitting to the mindless, static form of the emotion of fear known as despair, surrendering our free will to the external, inevitable force excuse for perpetually criminally negligent delinquency they both call “God.”

    All victimology-based extortion rackets are based on despair – the greedy fear that hope does not exist.

    “Since” there is no hope, one can only compromise with and Submit to the despairing notion of PITY for all the helpless “fellow victims” all the time.

    To counter the fact that fear, being “solid” static and so apparently reliable – at least when experienced through a shallow, emotional point of view, not a logical one, which might realize that all things being cyclical, from static to fluid to nebulous and back again as the universe expands and time passes – the hope itself is in the end just as “certain” as out fears, and in fact today’s hope pretty-much instantly if not automatically usually becomes tomorrow’s fears again anyway!

    This notion of a “solid” version of that which always feels like nebulous hope, (aks the “holy spirit) can be and often is angrily posited by people who deny automatic despair as the religious idol called “FAITH!”

    😉

    But pretending the nebulous and situational dynamic process of hope is idolatrous static faith is a lie.

    The only way you could be saved is if your god judged you as guilty as he is for your predicament, because before you left heaven you were part of him and had made an informed decision agreeing to come down here!

    But then again that’s false, as even your god can’t really love having to PITY you mortals all the time!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.