It’s her money only until leftists put out their hands
It’s her money only until leftists put out their hands

Tim Blair, The Daily Telegraph

The most sacred tenet of the leftist faith is unlimited access to other people’s money, for whatever purpose a leftist may desire. Any blasphemer who questions this holy entitlement will face a righteous condemnation.

For example, a few days ago I posted a brief item supporting former education minister Simon Birmingham’s veto of ridiculous grants, including:

$222,936 for a study of “post Orientalist arts in the Strait of Gibraltar”;

Nearly $1 million set to be wasted on “writing the struggle for Sioux and US modernity”;

and $226,811 earmarked for the examination of “musical heritage and cultural justice in the post-industrial legacy city”.


Reasonable people may have opposing points of view on the worth of academic grants and may argue in civil terms for their respective causes. This, however, was the response in comments from sweet leftist Mark:

You’re a dirty filthy disease Blair.

It doesn’t take much, does it?

Robert Spencer: What Will Happen When the Migrant Caravan Reaches the Border?

Robert Spencer in FrontPage:

It’s a lose-lose situation. Even if the military handles the migrants with kid gloves and no one gets so much as a hangnail, the establishment media will portray the American soldiers who are stopping the caravan as redneck thugs, mindlessly operating on the orders of the racist bigot in the White House. And if the migrants are not stopped, and enter the country, the same media will howl that Trump has not kept his word, and cannot be trusted.

President Trump has put the thousands who are advancing to the U.S. border on notice: “To those in the Caravan, turnaround, we are not letting people into the United States illegally. Go back to your Country and if you want, apply for citizenship like millions of others are doing!” But there is no chance that they will heed his words. They will continue to advance inexorably toward the United States, and what will happen when they get here? A likely answer to that comes from the recent border protests in Gaza.

The Jerusalem Post reported last May: “Some 40,000 Palestinians took part in violent demonstrations at 13 different locations along the fence, throwing stones, explosive devices and Molotov cocktails at the fence and IDF troops, as well as burning tires and launching burning objects such as kites with charcoal or containers of burning fuel with the intention of setting fires in Israeli fields, the IDF said.” Continue reading Robert Spencer: What Will Happen When the Migrant Caravan Reaches the Border?

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu: “This ruling is pleasing in all its aspects”

European Court of Human Rights says defaming the Prophet Muhammad exceeds permissible limits of freedom of expression

Ex-OIC chief welcomes court ruling on defaming Prophet

“The fight against Islamophobia and our opinions we have been voicing for years have been adopted and declared by the ECHR,” he said, adding: “This ruling is pleasing in all its aspects.”

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) recently ruled that freedom of speech must be balanced with “protecting the religious feelings” of others. Hence, Europeans are no longer allowed to call Muhammad offensive names like “pedophile,” even though he had sex with a prepubescent nine-year-old girl named Aisha. David Wood discusses the issue.


A former head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) welcomed a European Court of Human Rights’ (ECHR) decision that penalized defaming of the Prophet Muhammed.

“The decision, which shows that disrespect, insults and detestable enmities have nothing to do with the freedom of expression or human rights, deserves admiration,” Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu told Anadolu Agency on Friday. Continue reading Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu: “This ruling is pleasing in all its aspects”

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff responds to EU court’s ruling that speech insulting Muhammad is prohibited

Judgement from the European Court of Human Rights:

Infidels must not be allowed to “stir up prejudice and putting at risk religious peace.”

How can this stand in the year 2018?

Yesterday, Jihad Watch covered the troubling ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that “an Austrian woman’s criminal conviction and fine for her statements accusing the Prophet Muhammad of pedophilia did not breach her right to free speech.”

Insulting Muhammad is now forbidden, according to the ECHR, which has conceded to Sharia imperatives. This ruling is important not only for the “Austrian woman” who was not even named in the Daily Sabah article, but for all who support free speech. According to the ruling, Austrian courts had “carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected.”

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
Consider the impact of this ruling when weighed with what Pakistan’s President Imran Khan said: that he was “taking the matter [of blasphemy] to the United Nations, saying that few in the West understand the pain caused to Muslims by such activities.” Pakistan is well known for its cruel blasphemy laws.

The next step for the expansion of Sharia provisions in Europe will be the prohibition of all speech that is considered to be broadly offensive to Muhammad’s established religion — Islam — and offensive to the feelings of Muslims.

Robert Spencer wrote:

This is clearly the case of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who was fined and given a jail sentence for calling Muhammad a pedophile. He married a six-year-old and consummated the marriage when she was nine, but “the Austrian courts had held that ES was making value judgments partly based on untrue facts and without regard to the historical context.

Continue reading Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff responds to EU court’s ruling that speech insulting Muhammad is prohibited

In Europe, Free Speech Bows to Sharia

Andrew C. McCarthy

Members of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France,
Europeans are free to say only what the courts let them.

When he was 50, the prophet of Islam took as his wife Aisha, who was then six or seven. The marriage was consummated when Aisha was nine.

This is not a smear. It is an accurate account of authoritative Islamic scripture. (See, e.g., Sahih-Bukhari, Vol. 5, Book 58, Nos. 234–236.) Yet it can no longer safely be discussed in Europe, thanks to the extortionate threat of violence and intimidation — specifically, of jihadist terrorism and the Islamist grievance industry that slipstreams behind it. Under a ruling by the so-called European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), free speech has been supplanted by sharia blasphemy standards. Continue reading In Europe, Free Speech Bows to Sharia



Yes, this is true. I warned of it in the Washington Examiner in 2009 and in Newsmax.  The Euro-Med partnership.

It is planned for the U.S.A. as well. Think caravan.

Source Dreuz (translated)


And “nothing of the migratory traffic in the Mediterranean is ignored by the French authorities, military and civil”.

Lieutenant General Christophe Gomart, head of the DRM (Directorate of Military Intelligence), was responsible for gathering all the information likely to help France to make its military decisions.

At the opening of the symposium GEOINT (Geospatial Intelligence), held at the Geographical Society of Paris, on September 11 and 12, 2018, he explained how migratory traffic in the Middle East and the Mediterranean escaped intelligence. French.

The Military Intelligence Directorate, leader in France on satellite imagery intelligence (ROIM) provided by military spy satellites, inaugurated on January 19 a very discreet center of expertise, the Joint CRGI (Intelligence Center) geospatial).


Should it be illegal to call Mohammed a paedophile?

The ECHR have decided that truth is not a justification

October 27, 2018

Should you be allowed to say that the founder of one of the world’s largest religions was a paedophile? According to the European Court of Human Rights the answer is ‘no’. In a decision issued this week the Court in Strasbourg ruled that this statement is defamatory towards the prophet of Islam, ‘goes beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate’ and ‘could stir up prejudice and put at risk religious peace.’ Details of the long-running case can be read here.

I will come to the civilisational problems with this in a moment. But first allow me to point out what a difficult position this puts my book collection in. For beside me as I write I have a huge four-volume collection of the hadith (sayings) of Mohammed picked up on my travels in North Africa some years ago. They are the Bukhari hadith – that is the collection of hadith that scholars of Islam recognise to be the most authentic and reputable collection of Mohammed’s sayings. Whenever I open them I find out many interesting things about the founder of Islam.

For example, in ‘The Book of Ablution’ I can read what Mohammed thought about urination and the stances one might adopt during that act. I can also find advice about what to do with faeces and traces of blood coming from those same regions of the body. Crucially I can also learn what the prophet of Islam thought you should do with traces of ejaculate. I read, for instance about what those close to the prophet used to do with traces of semen found on his clothes. Sulaiman Ibn Yasar recounts what Mohammed’s last wife, Aisha, told him regarding this delicate subject:

‘I used to wash the traces of semen from the clothes of The Prophet “Allah’s blessing and peace be upon him” and he used to go for prayers while water spots were still visible on it.’ [230]

It may still be legal where I am sitting in Europe to quote this passage. But the next volumes could now get me into real trouble.

For example, here is a portion of the hadith known as ‘The Merits of The Ansar’:

‘Hesham narrated from his father: Khadija died three years before The Prophet “Allah’s blessing and peace be upon him” emigrated to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married A’isha when she was a girl of six years. He consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.’ [3896]

Tricky. Let me jump another volume forward in my collection of Hadith. This is from ‘The Book of Marriage’:

‘Urwa narrated: The Messenger of Allah “Allah’s blessing and peace be upon him” married A’isha when she was six years old, and consummated his marriage with her when she was nine. She remained with him nine years (till he died).’ [5158]

Which I think we can all agree is very awkward. All religious traditions have oddities. Some Christians and Jews recently expressed aggravation when Joe Rogan and I laughed at a portion of a text from their religious tradition regarding blasphemy, bears and baldies. But what can you do? Pretend that the legend of Elisha and the two bears isn’t in the Bible? Isn’t odd or funny? Burn all copies of the text?

Unwittingly, perhaps, the ECHR has brought us to something of an impasse in this ruling. For the hadith are – next to the Qur’an – the most important foundational texts of Islam. And they state, repeatedly and without caveat, that the founder of Islam had sex with a girl of nine, who he had married when she was six. Mohammed was 53 at this time.

Continue reading Should it be illegal to call Mohammed a paedophile?


European elite changes its tune – to enable surrender.

One week back in 2007, I was paid a not inconsiderable sum of money to fly first class from Oslo to Washington, D.C., on the Tuesday and to fly back on the Thursday, so that I could give a hour-long lunchtime talk on the Wednesday to an audience of American and international diplomats. Given that I had been compensated so well and given, as it was explained to me, that I had been accorded the star spot, the sole solo turn, in the middle of a day-long conference consisting otherwise of panel discussions about Western Europe, I foolishly expected a friendly reception.

My first doubts in this respect began to arise only moments after the event kicked off. Sitting through the morning’s panels, I heard one highly credentialed individual after another – professors, politicians, and retired and active diplomats from various countries – join in predicting a glowing future for Western Europe. Socially and economically, they all agreed, prospects looked a lot brighter for Western Europe than for America. Not a single one of the dozen or so panelists diverged from this consensus.

After three or four hours of sunny prophesizing, everybody lined up for the buffet. When they were all back in their seats, I was introduced and, from a lectern up front, proceeded to serve up a condensed version of the argument of my 2006 book While Europe Slept. I described the rise of Islam in Western Europe, the failure of Muslims to integrate, and the consequent increase in gang crime, welfare dependency, forced marriage, sharia-run enclaves, and numerous other ills – the usual litany. Western Europe, I maintained, was undergoing a radical metamorphosis that, unless drastic action were taken, would ultimately bring its liberal democracies crashing down.


Murder or Suicide? The West is in a State of Very Advanced Decline

‘Submission’ Author Houellebecq Claims West in ‘Advanced Decline’, EU ‘Murdering’ Europe’s Nations

HouellebecqGetty Images

Bestselling French writer Michel Houellebecq, author of the dystopian novel Submission, has claimed the West is in an advanced state of decline, echoing the views of the late philosopher Oswald Spengler.

Mr Houellebecq, who’s novel Submission looked at a France in which a pro-Sharia Islamist becomes the country’s president, said he saw the West in an advanced state of decline due to the rise of Islam and demographic changes caused by mass migration and low birthrates, Le Point reports.

He made the comments at the ceremony for the Oswald Spengler Prize, named after the early 20th-century German philosopher famous for his work The Decline of the West. 

Related news:

I consider the state of the West from the point of view of the two criteria that my intellectual history led me to consider as fundamental: demography and religion,” Houellebecq explained.

Continue reading Murder or Suicide? The West is in a State of Very Advanced Decline

Synagogue Attacked in Pittsburgh

BREAKING NEWS FROM PITTSBURGH: Gunman opens fire at synagogue, during service, MANY casualties


The  shooter  walked into the building and screamed “All Jews must die,” before opening fire.

President Trump says ‘results would have been far better’ if Pittsburgh synagogue had armed guard

CNN fake news hounds are on the case:

Just 3 months ago, the rabbi of the Pittsburgh synagogue where a deadly shooting has occured lamented gun violence and failure of lawmakers to tackle it

Responding Officers Shot

pittsburgh shooting

At least seven people are dead and others are injured, including police officers, following a Saturday morning attack at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh.

PITTSBURGH: Synagogue shooter Robert Bowers is Jew-hater and Trump-hater: The shooter is apparently a man named Robert Bowers, who hates Jews and hates President Trump. 

Texas IMAM: Raed Saleh Al-Rousan Al-Rousan one of many IMAM’s caught on camera inciting harm against Jews in America -“Judgment day will not come until the Muslims FIGHT the Jews” -“The Muslims WILL KILL the Jews” -“There is a Jew hiding behind me, come & KILL him” Pittsburgh

Merkel’s Germany: Seven Syrians Arrested After 18-year-old Gang Raped

Muslim migrant mob GANG-RAPED 18-year-old girl in front of disco 

The teenager is thought to have been drugged with a drink spiked with so-called ‘knockout drops’ in a night club, before being led outside to a wooded area and raped by up to fifteen males for four hours, Bild reports.

The German tabloid has named the ringleader as ‘Majd H’ and published a picture of him holding what they describe as a “machine gun” somewhere in the Middle East.

“The brutalisation of our country by these scum can no longer be endured!” declared Alice Weidel, leader of the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in the German federal parliament, in response to the news.

In Islamised UK town, diversity has completely disappeared, as almost all inhabitants are Muslim 

Telling the truth about Mohammad and insulting Mohammad are one and the same thing. And Europe just outlawed insulting Mohammad AKA outlawed the truth about Mohammad.– Bosch Fawstin

Bill Warner PhD: Muslim Candidates

We are seeing many Muslims run for office at the local, state and Federal levels. The day will come when there will be a Muslim candidate on every ballot, both Democratic and Republican. To combat this means that political action will have to happen long before the elections. Last minute panic will not help.

The United Nations has called on Saudi Arabia to repeal laws that allow stoning, amputation, flogging and execution of children.

Responding to the committee’s findings, the Saudi Human Rights Commission told the body that Islamic Sharia law, was above all laws and treaties, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

In Muslim countries, it’s illegal to insult Mohammad. In Europe, it’s illegal to insult Mohammad. In America, I can say Fuck Mohammad.

Insulting Islam Now Illegal in Europe

On September 25, 2012, two weeks after the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Hussein Obama stood before the United Nations General Assembly and said the following:


“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” Continue reading Synagogue Attacked in Pittsburgh