UK: University Suspends Student For Complaining about the ‘Islamisation’ of Britain

Once again we are seeing the collapse of the University, where fact-based reasoning no longer has status and only dogma is acceptable:

University suspends student, 19, who sparked outrage by saying the NHS should not be free to immigrants and complained about the ‘Islamisation’ of Britain during class discussions

Free Speech? Student Suspended from University for Calling Halal Slaughter ‘Inhumane’

  • Sebastian Walsh, 19, was suspended from the University of Central Lancashire  
  • Social work student expressed controversial views on halal meat and Islam  
  • The Ukip member complained the suspension breeches his human rights 

A student who claimed the NHS should not be free to immigrants and lamented about the ‘Islamisation’ of Britain has been kicked out of his university.

Sebastian Walsh expressed his controversial opinions during class seminars and the University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) decided to suspend him after they received several complaints about his behaviour.

The 19-year-old student also branded halal meat ‘barbaric’ and ‘inhumane’ and vowed to friends he would never eat at Subway or KFC due to the way the animals are killed.

Sebastian Walsh (pictured with Ukip leader Gerard Batten) branded halal meat 'barbaric' 

Sebastian Walsh (pictured with Ukip leader Gerard Batten) branded halal meat ‘barbaric’

The self-proclaimed ‘free speech advocate’ complained being struck-off from university was a violation of his human rights.

In other news:

‘Moderate’ Muslim: Let ISIS Bride Back in or Extremists May Kill You

Son of Hate Preacher is Latest ISIS to Want Back into Britain…

Labour Calls for Stripping IDF Soldiers of Citizenship – One Day after Call to Let ISIS Bride Back In

Hamas-Linked Lawyer: American ISIS Will ‘Deradicalize’ Others…

He said: ‘All I did was voice my opinions during debates about immigration.

‘I am totally against halal meat because I think it’s cruel – it’s an inhumane and barbaric way of slaughtering animals.

‘In another seminar class, we had a discussion about the privatisation of the NHS and I simply said I don’t think free healthcare should be available to immigrants.

‘These are views held by many people in the public and I believe I should be able to express them freely.

‘I feel completely victimised by my university.’

The University of Central Lancashire told Mr Walsh he could return to his social work studies in September is he signed a good conduct agreement and undertake a diversity training course.

Mr Walsh is a member of Ukip and the Preston branch of the political organisation has written to the university to defend the student

Mr Walsh is a member of Ukip and the Preston branch of the political organisation has written to the university to defend the student

However the first-year student from Wigan, Lancashire, is refusing to bow down.

Mr Walsh, a Ukip member, said: ‘Freedom of speech is a human right and I am determined to stand by this.

‘I will be fighting the university’s decision on this to make sure others aren’t punished for their opinions in future.’

The Preston branch of Ukip has pledged their support to the student and has written to the university to voice their concerns about the decision.

Treasurer Neil Graham said: ‘What has concerned me and many other members of our party is that this young boy is being denied his education for simply expressing his opinion.

‘Whether Sebastian is right or wrong, he should be able to voice his views in a university classroom and we believe passionately in his right to do so.

‘To paraphrase John Stewart Mill, nobody has the right to silence somebody’s opinion.’

Mr Graham added the Government released a document this month to protect free speech in higher education bodies.

Universities minister Chris Skidmore labelled the legislature ‘a symbol of commitment from across the sector to protecting the freedom of speech.’

A UCLAN spokesman said: ‘UCLAN is proud to host a campus community comprised of many cultures, faiths, nationalities and beliefs.

The university has told Mr Walsh that he must enrol in a diversity training course

‘It values this rich diversity and takes seriously its responsibility to provide a safe and welcoming environment for all.

‘The University promotes lawful, open debate, the discussion of varying views and academic freedom and has in place robust procedures to ensure this can take place.

‘In this case, a number of official complaints were made by students regarding a series of offensive and inappropriate comments made by Sebastian Walsh during lectures and seminars.

‘We cannot divulge the actual comments made by Sebastian as they formed part of a confidential investigation.

‘However, they clearly breached a number of the University’s conduct regulations, including those relating to harassment and bringing the University into disrepute.

‘In line with our official procedures, an investigation ensued, and a disciplinary hearing took place.

‘The student has been temporarily suspended for the remainder of the academic year and is aware that on the successful completion of a diversity training course, he will be able to resume his studies.’

UCLAN temporarily suspended Walsh for his remarks, which received complaints from other students 

UCLAN temporarily suspended Walsh for his remarks, which received complaints from other students

3 thoughts on “UK: University Suspends Student For Complaining about the ‘Islamisation’ of Britain”

  1. Re: “‘In this case, a number of official complaints were made by students regarding a series of offensive and inappropriate comments made by Sebastian Walsh during lectures and seminars.

    ‘We cannot divulge the actual comments made by Sebastian as they formed part of a confidential investigation.

    ‘However, they clearly breached a number of the University’s conduct regulations, including those relating to harassment and bringing the University into disrepute.

    ‘In line with our official procedures, an investigation ensued, and a disciplinary hearing took place.

    ‘The student has been temporarily suspended for the remainder of the academic year and is aware that on the successful completion of a diversity training course, he will be able to resume his studies.’”

    Doesn’t he know that, in holding muslims to account, he’s going against their policies of official racism?! You know, where all members of the swarthy “People Of Colour’s” global crime and murder gang are to never be held to account or asked to take any self-reliant responsibility for their own criminal choices, simply because, as mentally inferior animal-people, they are naturally held hostage by their animal instincts, and so it’s perfectly natural for them to be prone to violence if and when ever “oppressed” (confused) by the mentally-superior whites?!

    😉

  2. Liberal racists routinely refuse to condemn crimes committed by “swarthy” criminals and defend islam simply because it’s a crime gang of non-Whites.

    And colleges and Universities all make such a simple, basic mistake that they have totally disqualified themselves from being “institutes of higher learning!”

    Here’s both how and why this latest debacle has developed in our world (and will probably only get worse):

    Most people only go to college to pay people who claim to be smart, to tell them that they are smart, too, and make it all “official.”

    Then the stupidity sets in:

    Snowflakes are being taught to act like perpetual victims, not realizing that in their long march to replace freedom with security, they will all end up being euthanized in gulags! They are literally being taught by “intellectuals” to Act Dumb – to act as helpless victims without any free-will responsibility!

    They pretend they have no choice but to extort others (who, as “oppressors,” obviously did have choices)!

    All liberal social science/humanities “teach” about (abuse students with) islam (“Submission” to Authority) these days – because they all really only describe victimology, where there is no morality because they insist there is no free-will choice.

    As in islam itself, one must SUBMIT to GOING ALONG (with the criminals’ main lie, that they are really only “fellow victims” – of society/mere products of their environments, and proudly helpless slaves of unknown and unknowable allah) TO GET ALONG (with all the other scary lying criminals)! It’s might-makes-right extortion!

    And perpetual extortion is also known as “slavery!” This is why governments still fund 50% of “higher education!”

    Because both corporations and governments WANT people to be hypocritical psychopaths – people who are always instinctively willing to compromise and Submit to Authority, who can be guaranteed to always want to go along to get along, and who will never, ever, challenge the status quo by attempting to actually solve any real problems, or accuse any real criminals of their crimes, that’s why!

    “Teaching” (abusing helpless and naive kids with) victimology is the ONLY thing these delusively blind so-called and only self-described institutes of higher education do these days! Which really means extortive criminal victimality, since no true “victimology” can really ever exist at all anyway!

    And their “Diversity” ALWAYS really only ever means:
    “We Want Fewer White People!”

    And yet whites are THE global MINORITY.

    And, as such (“racism” really only meaning preference for one’s own breed, also known as a right to free association) Whites are technically the least racist breed in the world, with Asians being the most racist, and Dravidians (“Hindus”) being the second-most racist, etc.

    So making plans and “laws” seeking to dilute and destroy (aka genocide) the global minority in their own lands by importing more and more of the global majorities, is not only incredibly stupid, but it should also be (and, technically, actually is) illegal.

    All so-called “Indigenous Minorities” are actually global majorities, too: the “natives” in the North, Central and South Americas, are all no more than displaced backwoods hillbilly ASIANS, while the Australian Aborigines are nothing more or less than displaced Dravidians from India – as even most Dravidians still in India will openly and proudly admit to.

  3. Here’s how the so-called “soft” sciences aka “humanities” (anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even Law or criminology) really work: They all started off by examining the various symptoms and EFFECTS of human behavior, thinking, group-thinking behavior, and of criminal free-will CHOICES, respectively, but then self-invalidated by looking for hidden mysterious predestined and predetermined inevitable force “CAUSES” of it all, which degraded them all into only one criminal, excuse-making alibi topic:

    “VICTIMOLOGY!”

    So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

    Law-abiding Conservatives: “Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!”

    Criminal libertines: “But what CAUSED that choice? There’s always a cause!”

    Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we’re all “victims.”

    In short: they went from studying HOW people CHOOSE to act, to focusing on WHY (ruling out free will choice entirely)!

    And that “why” PRESUMES a fear of pain will ALWAYS trump rationality! “So” we are all really ever only helpless victims! Asking “why” people (‘always’) give in to the fear of pain, presumes that: “SINCE anything CAN go wrong, SO it WILL always go wrong, SO we MUST forgive everyone for their mistakes, as being helpless victims!”

    But in reality, the only reason WHY people commit crimes, is that they still think they can have rights without responsibilities, and so they weigh all the risks and rewards in different situational circumstances first!

    And they only try to do so in each and every separate circumstantial situation, because they haven’t learned that rights ALWAYS only come with responsibilities, causes with effects, and effects with causes, and so they either remain ignorant of, or choose to ignore, the simple Golden Rule of Law moral Principle:
    “Do Not Attack First.”

    BOTTOM LINE:

    These days, uselessly PITYING the victims (and the criminals AS “fellow victims,”) is held up as the highest moral virtue, while being usefully ANGRY at, (or “hateful” towards) criminals and crime is deemed to be the most vile sin.

    But what is more useful in solving problems and remedying crime: being angry at criminals for their predatory choices, or encouraging them to commit more crimes, by pitying them as helpless victims too?

    The answer is obvious.

    Hope is NOT a Plan.

    But (beyond keeping the masses controlled by shaming them into giving up their right to get angry at oppressors, by tricking them into substituting useless static pity for useful dynamic anger) the motto of all governments everywhere will always remain “There’s No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”

    So it’s high time to educate these higher-learning “educators” of their mistakes!

    In always asking “But WHY?” like perverse little children bedevilling their parents, they can always step back any given answer and exploit it into a whole new and lucrative “specialized” academic field of study!

    But the focus they pretend to thereby gain in minutae actually loses the focus on the big picture or “unified field” of science itself – by deliberately reducing everything they become absurd, or “reducio ad absurdum,” to the Latins.

    And, while the simple answer IS obvious to us, unfortunately so is their own criminally negligent desire to “fail upwards” by ignoring the simple easy and permanent solutions to any and all problems, in favor of exploiting and selling the almost infinite number of mere symptoms and effects of unsolved problems as causes in them selves, as eternal crises for which only temporary band-aid therapy reliefs can ever be applied.

    After all, the motto of all responsibility-averse and willfully delinquent libertine “liberal” criminals must be: “There’s No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”

    So their final message these days seems to be:
    “Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”

Comments are closed.