A Top West London art gallery covered up two paintings last week at the request of the artist after Muslim visitors complained they were “blasphemous,” according to The Times.
Usama Hasan, head of Islamic studies at the think tank Quilliam, said the paintings were not only offensive but blasphemous and sacrilegious. “They are really dangerous,” he said. “It’s The Satanic Verses all over again.” –The Times
‘Dangerous’ for whom? Usama Hasan from Quilliam should be asked
One of the paintings by pseudonymous artist SKU features Arabic script from the “shahada” one of the pillars of Islam contained in the Quran – overlaid on Ingress’s Grande Odalisque, with stars of David completing a mock American flag. It is meant to represent the conflict between Islamic extremists and America, according to the Times.
@Saatchi_Gallery submits to blackmail: places a Burka over an artwork after complaints from Mohammedans.
The gallery has previously put works such as ‘Piss Christ’ — a crucifix submerged in urine — on proud display, flatly rejecting objections from Christians.
First, we feign outrage, then berate them to bow, then force them to kneel, then to grovel. Pity we can’t break them for they’re made of mush masquerading as men.
Saatchi Gallery covers up two artworks after complaints from Muslim visitors
The two pieces are part of a new exhibition by the artist SKU, which explores how ‘we absorb such influences in our minds and our bodies’
The Saatchi Gallery has covered two paintings after complaints from Muslim visitors that the works are “blasphemous”.
The two pieces are part of a new exhibition by the artist SKU, featuring classical-style nudes overlaid with Arabic script, in a way that appears to imitate the American flag – intended to represent the conflict between the US and Islamic extremists.
However, according to The Times, the inclusion of the shahada, an Islamic creed and one of the Five Pillars of Islam, prompted a backlash, with Muslim visitors asking for them to be removed from the London gallery.
The head of Islamic studies at the think tank Quilliam, Usama Hasan, said the works were ”really dangerous”, adding: “It’s The Satanic Verses all over again.”
SKU’s exhibition was advertised as exploring “how we, as individuals, are subject to wider culture, economic, moral, and political forces in society”. It also examines how ”we absorb such influences in our minds and our bodies”, as well as the “promotion of values in symbols and propaganda”. The exhibition ends with a call to “reboot the world”.
The gallery rejected demands to remove the paintings entirely, arguing that visitors should be able to see the works and draw their own conclusions. The artist instead requested they were covered.
“It seemed a respectful solution that enables a debate about freedom of expression versus the perceived right not to be offended,” he said.
While the gallery said it “fully supported” freedom of expression as a fundamental right, it added: “the gallery also recognises the sincerity of the complaints made against these works and supported the artist’s decision to cover them until the end of the exhibition.”