Can Muslim Terrorists Be “Deradicalized”?

Can Muslim Terrorists Be “Deradicalized”?

Certainly not by people who make their money going around calling Islamic terrorism “extremism”.  These people are fooling us, and above all they’re fooling themselves.

Tanning takes its toll

Coronavirus Commie Cheers China

John Pilger is still alive and he’s still on the wrong side of everything. Lately, the suntanned Australian socialist hails China’s “model” response to the coronavirus and condemns “racist” US travel restrictions.

HOW THE LEFT HATES: REZA ASLAN GLOATS THAT RUSH LIMBAUGH HAS CANCER

Ex CNN man Reza Aslan gloats over Rush Limbaugh’s cancer diagnosis: “Ask yourself this simple question: is the world a better place or a worse place with Rush Limbaugh in it?”  He shames himself and the Chicago Theological Seminary stupid enough to hire him. This same low life once gloated that an innocent Covington student had a “punchable” face.

Shit-eater Reza Aslan is a nasty piece of work.

Islamic extremistsDevout Muslims hack 36 to death with machetes, including Christian pastor in DRC
Met Police’s Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu admits: We can’t trail all terror suspects because there’s too many

Once you have more than 5 million Mohammedans in the country you know that the elites have sold you out.

Neil Basu’s comments are his first since armed police shot dead Sudesh Amman as he began stabbing passers-by in Streatham High Road.
Neil Basu’s comments are his first since armed police shot dead Sudesh Amman as he began stabbing passers-by in Streatham High Road.

Police cannot watch all the dangerous extremists on Britain’s streets because there are too many, the most senior counter-terrorism officer warned today.

  • Yard plea for public’s health as it fights potential threat from ‘3,000 on radar’

 “Popular”

From the Religion of Peace:

CAIR Leader Eulogizes Anti-Semitic ‘Fan of Hitler’…
Palestinian Attacks on Jews Recreated in Animation for Kids…
Uber Driver Planned to Drive Van into Pride Parade…
Ex-Muslim Trolled for Celebrating Freedom with Swimsuit Photo…
Islamic Terror Threatens to Displace 900,000 in Burkina Faso…
(France) Left-Wing Elites Called Out for Not Defending 16-Year-Old…
Mentally-Challenged Woman Acquitted of ‘Blasphemy’ over Dog
Islamic Scholar: Normalization with Israel is ‘Treason Against Allah’…
Video: Men Complain about Sassy Women Who “Show Themselves”…
Spokesman for Islamic Terror Group Found Living in France…
Prosecutors: Brother of Ariana Concert Bomber ‘Just as Guilty’…
Hispanic Maid Survives Stabbing Attempt…
Greenfield: Bernie Pushes Hard for Muslim Bloc…
PA Official Threatens: Anyone Who Supports Peace “Will Pay the Price”
Man Hurls Shoe at Indian Judge: “I Believe Only in the Quran”…
Pakistan May Allow Victim of Forced Conversion to Testify…
Reza Aslan Hails Limbaugh Cancer: ‘World Will Be Better Off’…

 

One thought on “Can Muslim Terrorists Be “Deradicalized”?”

  1. I think Islam started out for a VERY SHORT time with a not-bad idea, that, whenever you thought you were right, but were later proven wrong, you shouldn’t have to feel guilty about it, because back then that’s the way God wanted you to think and feel; just learn from your mistakes, and move on (no “Original Sin!” to obsess over, no infinitely regressive incarnations going back to the beginning of time, which in the end only amounts to the same thing, to need to explain why bad things happen to good people). BUT then, Moe “reasoned,” why limit it to only past mistakes? If and when you feel like you shouldn’t have to learn from your past mistakes, but insist that, since you were right to feel right back then, then why shouldn’t you still feel entitled to feel like you should still be right, even if and when stupid “facts” try to interfere and prove you wrong? Why should you have to learn from mistakes at all? If God wanted you to feel right in the past, then you’re still entitled to feel right now – after all, the past present and future all belong to God! So if you choose to not have to learn from your past mistakes, and refuse to accept new facts, then God must have wanted you to act like a hypocrite, too! So you’re always right!

    Then he said (as any hypocrite would) that all other hypocrites had to be killed, and everyone had to do as he said, not as he did! Might makes right! Whee!

    All hypocrites presume and project that they are God and everyone else is dirt. For islam to work as advertised, one would be supposed to simply “Submit” to whatever God/The Universe threw at one, and so have to greet each an every hypocrite one encountered every day, AS the “God” they pretended to be. While Jains and Buddhists are like that, Muslims are most definitely NOT. Why? Because to them, despite Moe being the Perfect Example of Humanity for All Mankind, he also (being an arch-hypocrite) reserved that sort of behavior for him self alone, because (like all the other hypocrites) while he obviously claimed to speak for God, and literally called everyone who didn’t go along with this lie, to get along with such an obviously dangerous liar, “dirt” (al-kufr means the dirt) he also had to know what real, objective standards were, in order to be able to so perfectly apply them to everyone else, while reserving the double standards of selfish subjectivity for him self alone. So, even if and when Islam wins the global domination it so officially desires and prophesizes it will, that same ‘ihsan kamil’ idol of Muhammad must fall, for even if and when everyone is a Muslim, not everyone can be a Muhammad – and, in fact, for an Islamic society to survive at all, there can be no more Muhammads. There can be no division of “better” and “worse” Muslims, and Islam will end up having to embrace The Golden Rule of Law’s moral principle after all, and its Arabization will fade into the sands of history either way as Islam slinks back into its cave like the two-headed mutant snake that it always was.

    This is MY prophecy.

    😉

Comments are closed.